Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:30AM EDT
See Comments (279)
Many states (including California,
New York, Washington, the District of Columbia, and Connecticut) have imposed laws requiring
drivers to use hands-free devices to make phone calls. New Jersey even made
violation of its law a first offense. But several studies over the years have
found that talking on a hands-free device is not much safer than talking on a
hand-held device.
A study by the American Psychological Association of over 500 drivers found that talking on a cell phone cut activity in areas of the brain used for driving by half. Drivers focusing on a phone conversation had slower reaction times, were less likely to recall objects on the road, and had a hard time noticing traffic around them. Researchers also noted that hands-free devices in the car posed the same hazards as hand-held devices.
A different study by the University of Utah tested drivers' use of hands-free cell phones on the road, and found (to no one's surprise) that chatty drivers were the main cause of traffic problems. Apparently, drivers talking on a cell phone were less likely to change lanes, and spent more time following slow-moving vehicles.
The latest research by Carnegie Mellon University questions hands-free laws, and whether their existence only gives drivers a false sense of safety. To test this theory, neuroscientist Marcel Just studied 29 volunteers who used a driving simulator inside an MRI brain scanner. The volunteers were tasked with driving a car along a virtual winding road, with and without distractions.
Researchers found that drivers would hit the guardrail and veer out of the center of the lane more often when they tried to answer true or false questions. Brain scans of the distracted drivers showed brain activity decreased in areas that process visual and spatial information, functions that are crucial for navigation. Once again, this proved that participating in a conversation is all it took to reduce a driver's focus on the road.
As reported in This is London, Just concluded:
So while there may be laws out there that ban the use of hand-held phones behind the wheel, the truth is the road will remain a dangerous place as long as drivers continue to carry phone conversations on hands-free devices - so be careful out there.
Link: Driving study deals blow to hands-free phones
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
All of that may be true. If so, What about conversations with OTHER PASSENGERS IN THE CAR. Are we going to disallow passsengers from riding in the car because they distract us from driving? I believe passengers are distracting when conversing with the driver. It's the reason why some bus companies do not allow talking to the driver. Some common sense must be used here. The driver needs to understand that his attention is needwed on the road and perhps he should discourage conversation if he can't converse and drive at the same time.
Personally, I use an earpiece when I am driving, one of the kind that has a small button hanging over my chest. That way, I leave my phone open so I can see who it is quickly and then either ignore the call or hit the button not far from my hand anyway. I like to think that I have been ok so far. When I am talking while driving, I make sure the person I am talking to understands that I might have to hang up quickly. I use my own judgement as to if I answer the call. If there is light traffic, I am more likely to answer than if there is moderate traffic (again, using my own judgement). If there is heavy, then I wont answer. Period.
Hmm... Distracted driving... like having kids in the car? or pets? Or having conversations with passengers? Should we make it illegal to let our spouses ride in the car with us? Someone needs to hurry up and invent teleporters....
There are a lot of distractions while driving. I think it is more dangerous to try and find and change a cd while driving than talking on a cell phone for a few minutes. So I gave up on the cd thing and keep the cell phone use to a minimum. Usually while stopped in traffic.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by alpyne2 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:51PM EDT Report Abuse
OK - distracted driving can be dangerous. The reality is that 90% of the time driving is boring - mind numbing even. Good drivers learn to notice patterns, and when those patterns change, they tune in and do what is needed to avoid delays & accidents. People who expect all drivers to be focused on just driving 100% of the time need to drink another flavor of KoolAid. The reality is that humans beings drive cars while experiencing various states of distraction - which is why we strive to improve roads, improve the safety of vehicles, and improve the response time of emergency services. Parties involved in accidents should be penalized in proportion to the damage they cause. Egregious & repeat offenders might need to lose their driving privileges. Bans such as these constitute punishment before the fact for accidents you might cause (or might not). If we're going to ban talking on phones, then we need to ban talking to passengers, ban singing along with the radio, and make yelling at other motorists a capital crime.