Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:01PM EST
See Comments (37)
The next big casualty in our current recessionary era is the good old state budget. Many states (including my own California) have been fiscally reckless for years, overspending ruthlessly and then trying to figure out how to make up the budget shortfalls after the fact -- and generally failing at it -- just like the federal government. Now, with sales, property, and income taxes rapidly shrinking, things are looking extremely dire as state coffers are quickly emptying out.
Case in point: The state of New York, which now faces a $15.4 billion shortfall between revenues and proposed spending -- the collapse of Wall Street (and the loss of the taxes it once generated) has hit New York especially hard. The result? Lots of budget cuts, and tons of new fees and taxes, including a new tax on the sale of digitally downloaded music and movies, per a budget proposal from Governor David Paterson.
Pundits have already dubbed it the "iPod tax" (though, oddly, it does not actually create new taxes on iPod hardware or other gadgets -- perhaps "iTunes tax" would be a better moniker). According to the proposal, new taxes would also be levied on everything from movie tickets to taxi rides to massage services.
New York has been anxious to get its tax hooks into the Internet for some time now. This summer it finally enacted a law that forces out-of-state companies to collect taxes on Internet sales to New York residents. Amazon promptly sued. That case is still pending.
Paterson's budget proposal now goes to lawmakers for approval. Any New Yorkers out there care to weigh in on the issue? No one likes new taxes, I know, but are things getting truly dire to the point where drastic measures are required?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Here in Northern Kentucky, I'm charged an extra 4 or 5 cents per track I download from itunes as "Kentucky Tax". I'm surprised NY hasn't been doing this all along.
It's called sales tax genius. i do agree that it is outrageous though. Who wants roads, bridges, police officers, firemen, schools/teachers, etc (ST sales tax does not fund wars). That stuff is useless, an IPod loaded with my favorite songs is all I need.
So I'm not the only person who thinks that this getting approved would push some people back towards file sharing as a way to get the music they want..Can't say which way Id go till it's enacted.
Tax, tax and more tax. Here's my question ~ when do the powers that be realize it's enough already?
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by hossainakbar89 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:20PM EDT Report Abuse
this is outrageous. why should the people have to pay taxes for digitally downloading audio and video files imposed by the darn when they're already spending their hard earned on itunes amazon zune etc this is the government's fault we're in this recession and most of our money was spent in the middle east fund the war and the abomination to god's green earth israel and it's history for violation of human rights we didn't ask for this we were contradicted by the government who was supposed to take care of its country and its residents the government should be dismantled