Sun Jun 17, 2007 1:18PM EDT
See Comments (18)
Reader Renda Edmunds writes: I wrote you a few days ago about my daughter's computer for UT-Southwestern Med School and you recommended we get a Mac. It turns out we can't really select Apple because it will only run about 85% of the software they use. They do not recommend any specific brand of PC but the on-site repair service from Dell suggests Dell may be the easy answer. I have a quote from Dell on a laptop that runs Vista. But UT does not support Vista, so XP is required. Dell told me they could not put the next-generation Wireless N into a computer with XP. Also the same for Sound Blaster. Would that be true for other brands as well?
Renda is facing some hard choices in what ought to be a relatively simple search for a laptop for her daughter. A Mac won't run all the software she needs, the school doesn't support Vista, and the latest laptops won't run XP properly. It's a catch-22 in triplicate.
What to do? Fortunately, some solutions readily present themselves. In fact, you can amicably get out of this situation with any one of the above three options. Here's how:
Does Dell offer a lower-end sound option on XP machines? You probably won't notice any difference in audio quality. That said, a better option is probably simply to shop around for a different machine that does have all the driver support you need under XP. And yes, this issue will impact all vendors. A final option would be to purchase a slightly older machine running XP, if you can find one. If you really want a Dell, check out a refurbished unit.
Alas, I fear your decision is still a tough one. If I had my druthers and price is no object, I'd recommend the Mac. She'll be happier with it in the long run and Parallels works great.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Thanks Christopher. Dell does have a lower end sound option with XP, just not Soundblaster. Renda Edmunds
I have a Mac using both Mac and XP (I purchased the XP from someone on eBay, you just have to make sure it's SP2 to work with Boot Camp) on Boot Camp and love it. My daughter plays World of Warcraft on the PC side, and there is NO difference between a Windows machine and Boot Camp.
Dell might have said that they can't put 802.11n into computers with XP, but I did it about seven months ago with my computers. Its more likely that they just WON'T do it, since Vista is supposed to optimize wireless connections (I still haven't seen proof of this). I would have to agree with Christopher though, the Mac would be the way to go. I've also heard Parallels is the way to go if your going to run windows applications, since you don't have to reboot into windows.
If a person wishes to work with Boot Camp and have Windows on the side, doesn't that mean that one would have to purchase a retail copy of Windows XP? That isn't exactly cheap either. Do I have this right? I have considered doing a dual boot myself.
The Creative Zen Aurvana earphones are like "nirvana for audio." Well the audio does sound good, but ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by thekclyon on Sun Jun 17, 2007 10:43PM EDT Report Abuse
Kudos. I agree, and she'll have that Mac for YEARS.