EFF Looks Back at Four Years of RIAA Lawsuits

Wed Sep 5, 2007 10:58PM EDT

See Comments (3)

This Saturday marks the fourth anniversary of the RIAA's first lawsuits against consumers, alleging that they were violating copyright by sharing songs on peer-to-peer networks. More than 20,000 (and probably about 30,000) people have been targeted since, and the RIAA shows no signs of slowing down. And yet, P2P networks continue to grow in popularity. Are the lawsuits having any effect?

The EFF takes us on a candid and interesting history lesson [PDF link] in this report, walking us through the RIAA's initial attempts to sue the technology companies out of existence, then, when that failed, to issue "DMCA subpoenas by the thousands," which eventually led to the first wave of settlements: One of the first to settle was a 12-year-old girl living in NYC public housing, forced to publicly apologize for her actions and pay a $2,000 settlement. But the RIAA started on the wrong foot, as well, withdrawing lawsuits against the obviously innocent, like a grandma accused of downloading hardcore rap using Windows software... though she had a Mac.

By 2004 the RIAA began suing "John Doe" defendants, basically filing lawsuits against IP addresses without bothering to subpoena the ISPs for a name attached to the IP address. Meanwhile, suits against the poor, disabled, and the dead piled up. The tales of those sued wrongly are legion and, in many cases, quite frightening.

Are the lawsuits working? Doesn't look that way: Globally, the number of P2P users has risen from 3.8 million in August 2003 to 8.9 million by June 2005.

What does the EFF propose to get the RIAA back to sanity? A reasonably-priced, DRM-free, all-you-can-eat P2P system in exchange for, say, $5 a month. While I'm sure the RIAA would never go such a deal (it might jump on a $150 a month plan), I'm hard-pressed to come up with anything better. Anyone got any good ideas on curtailing piracy while keeping artists fairly paid? How about getting rid of the RIAA altogether and sharing the cost of running the organization?

This PDF is a lengthy essay (8 of the 25 pages are footnotes), but if you're at all interested in how the music industry has ended up in the messy state it's in, it's a history lesson definitely worth the read, and the remembrance.

Thanks, Ars Technica

Comments on EFF Looks Back at Four Years of RIAA Lawsuits

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by rogueist on Wed Sep 5, 2007 11:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    Now its time for the RIAA to be sued by the people - they began an illegal blind witchhunt and now its time for them to face their rewards in court. More class action lawsuits need to be filed against the RIAA, and hopefully some artists will file their own lawsuits against the RIAA for infringements upon them too. The court system wields the scythe both ways, and its time for the RIAA to face their own demise.

  • 2 Posted by millerz1972 on Thu Sep 6, 2007 12:38AM EDT Report Abuse

    How we can allow a group of money hungry lawyers to sue people off the hip is beyond me. Though I agree artists/production companies of their work need to be fairly rewarded, I find it so unbelievable that the RIAA could just start slamming scare tactics at the people who DO ACTUALLY BUY MUSIC/MOVIES. Give me a break RIAA...these are your customers! How about lowering the prices on the hundreds of cd's and dvd's that are less than desirable. I have to agree with Mr. Null on this one..get rid of the RIAA altogether. It's all about money and I think the world will survive without them.

  • 3 Posted by mcmillen66 on Thu Sep 6, 2007 10:00AM EDT Report Abuse

    I think there is a place for RIAA in the world, protecting the legal rights of musicians, but what they are doing now is akin to financial terrorism. The music industry needs to focus on its next business model. The old days of selling hard media are over. Also, I would like to see more music being distributed without corporations, through online communities. As long as musicians are good performers, they will have little trouble earning a living through live performances. I really don't care if their recorded music earns them (or corporations like Sony) any money at all. Music companies have for decades now existed like leaches on the backs of musicians. It's time for the leaches to get their due.

More Posts: First Prev 1 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.