Wed Sep 5, 2007 10:58PM EDT
See Comments (3)
This Saturday marks the fourth anniversary of the RIAA's first lawsuits against consumers, alleging that they were violating copyright by sharing songs on peer-to-peer networks. More than 20,000 (and probably about 30,000) people have been targeted since, and the RIAA shows no signs of slowing down. And yet, P2P networks continue to grow in popularity. Are the lawsuits having any effect?
The EFF takes us on a candid and interesting history lesson [PDF link] in this report, walking us through the RIAA's initial attempts to sue the technology companies out of existence, then, when that failed, to issue "DMCA subpoenas by the thousands," which eventually led to the first wave of settlements: One of the first to settle was a 12-year-old girl living in NYC public housing, forced to publicly apologize for her actions and pay a $2,000 settlement. But the RIAA started on the wrong foot, as well, withdrawing lawsuits against the obviously innocent, like a grandma accused of downloading hardcore rap using Windows software... though she had a Mac.
By 2004 the RIAA began suing "John Doe" defendants, basically filing lawsuits against IP addresses without bothering to subpoena the ISPs for a name attached to the IP address. Meanwhile, suits against the poor, disabled, and the dead piled up. The tales of those sued wrongly are legion and, in many cases, quite frightening.
Are the lawsuits working? Doesn't look that way: Globally, the number of P2P users has risen from 3.8 million in August 2003 to 8.9 million by June 2005.
What does the EFF propose to get the RIAA back to sanity? A reasonably-priced, DRM-free, all-you-can-eat P2P system in exchange for, say, $5 a month. While I'm sure the RIAA would never go such a deal (it might jump on a $150 a month plan), I'm hard-pressed to come up with anything better. Anyone got any good ideas on curtailing piracy while keeping artists fairly paid? How about getting rid of the RIAA altogether and sharing the cost of running the organization?
This PDF is a lengthy essay (8 of the 25 pages are footnotes), but if you're at all interested in how the music industry has ended up in the messy state it's in, it's a history lesson definitely worth the read, and the remembrance.
Thanks, Ars Technica!
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
How we can allow a group of money hungry lawyers to sue people off the hip is beyond me. Though I agree artists/production companies of their work need to be fairly rewarded, I find it so unbelievable that the RIAA could just start slamming scare tactics at the people who DO ACTUALLY BUY MUSIC/MOVIES. Give me a break RIAA...these are your customers! How about lowering the prices on the hundreds of cd's and dvd's that are less than desirable. I have to agree with Mr. Null on this one..get rid of the RIAA altogether. It's all about money and I think the world will survive without them.
I think there is a place for RIAA in the world, protecting the legal rights of musicians, but what they are doing now is akin to financial terrorism. The music industry needs to focus on its next business model. The old days of selling hard media are over. Also, I would like to see more music being distributed without corporations, through online communities. As long as musicians are good performers, they will have little trouble earning a living through live performances. I really don't care if their recorded music earns them (or corporations like Sony) any money at all. Music companies have for decades now existed like leaches on the backs of musicians. It's time for the leaches to get their due.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by rogueist on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse
Now its time for the RIAA to be sued by the people - they began an illegal blind witchhunt and now its time for them to face their rewards in court. More class action lawsuits need to be filed against the RIAA, and hopefully some artists will file their own lawsuits against the RIAA for infringements upon them too. The court system wields the scythe both ways, and its time for the RIAA to face their own demise.