First Looks at Next-Gen Windows 7

Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:33PM EDT

See Comments (6)

Though we're not yet a year out from Vista, developers and academics are starting to get sneak peeks at the next version of Windows, known as Windows 7 for the time being. Last week Microsoft's Eric Traut demonstrated the super-early-alpha version Windows 7 as part of a presentation on virtualization technology. While you should draw no conclusions about how Windows 7 might actually run or what it will look like when it arrives in 2010 or so, this does make for an interesting few minutes of video to get you inside the mindset of Microsoft developers in the post-Vista age... plus you get to see a little peek of Microsoft Bob.

The 8-minute, embedded video on this page takes you on a little tour of the past (all the way back to Windows 1.0) before launching into the future with an early peek at Windows 7. How early are we talking? It takes up 25MB of storage space and has no graphics system (don't miss the ASCII art Windows flag at boot), but it does include a rudimentary web server on its streamlined core. Boot time for the OS is just about 20 seconds. Traut talks at length about streamlining and bloat. His comments are a clear response to the criticisms that Microsoft has faced in recent years over its overly large products, and a possible indication that with the next version of Windows, simplicity and speed might be a real goal.

Alas, the version of Windows 7 (called MinWin) you'll see in the video will likely not be part of the shipping version of whatever Windows ultimately becomes. It will, however, show up in locations where a super-streamlined version of the OS is required, such as set-top boxes or other embedded devices.

The video is just an excerpt of a longer presentation on virtualization, which you can see in full here (WMV link).

More info: Core of "Windows 7" taking shape

Comments on First Looks at Next-Gen Windows 7

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by miller6994 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why bother? Go Linux! What ever version you like.Lots to choose from. Easy, fast, no product keys to jerk around with and exploding support on their forums. 2 or 3 PCs in your house, the cost is the same $0.

  • 2 Posted by miller6994 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wonder how much it will cost per PC? Vista was so cheap - I can't wait!

  • 3 Posted by robmaresca on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    Have we not learned yet? Windows 95 to 98 was not bad, then Millennium came out and it was a disaster. Wait, XP arrives, and finally things were looking up (when service pack 2 came out), and then.....drum roll please....Vista (which has been a pain in the booty) since I upgraded. It took vista for me to switch to Mac, and all my headaches went away. Windows 7, 21, 55, etc just seems like another disaster waiting to happen.

  • 5 Posted by bruns.seth on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree! Mac's are way better than any PC will ever be. Switch to Apple it's worth the money. But about the Vista situation, it is a good thing they are replacing it finnaly. If you asked me; when they started having all these probelms i would have just stopped producing it and converted back to XP until they release version 7. But thats Microsoft's fault. I really don't know why buisnesses stay with PC's. Our world would be so much advanced if all corps and working places converted to Mac.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.