Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:04AM EST
See Comments (8)
Think $4 for a Net movie rental is pricey? You could be paying a lot more if your ISP takes a liking to bandwidth caps.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
This might be one of the worst ideas ever. This is TW trying to be cheap. The future will be all done on the internet, and at the rate they are going TW wont be ready. If they are doing this instead of buy newer machines that can handle all the bandwidth then they wont have to do tis and will have much happier customers.
Perhaps the solution can be found on the upload side rather than the download side. P2P users use far more than the average upload bandwith. Comcast is being investigated for cutting such users off. I feel no sympathy for those who traffic in bootleg video or audio and it certainly seems fair to me that such users pay a higher rate for their internet service or be cut off when their upload limits are reached.
@lewinjon: Excellent idea re: uploading bandwidth. That should cover ISP concerns about P2P'ers. Unfortunately, this whole issue could be more a question of revenue rather than bandwidth.
I like the "good value" phrase, that's the one they use to keep CD prices high and we know how well that's worked. It's only generated methods of getting Cd's copied to get around the high prices for something that costs less than a couple of cents to make. How else can the CEO's have their multi-million dollar incomes. You want it, they've got it, your going to pay to the hilt for it.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by johnord on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:39PM EDT Report Abuse
The idea that Time Warner - or any high bandwidth ISP - currently has an "all you can eat" plan is a myth. It's been well documented that Verizon and other ISP's put a stranglehold on your bandwidth if you download more than a certain amount of data each month (it's been rumored to be about 4-5 GB's a month). The problem is, they were sued over this and now may be forced to change thier advertising to reflect that in reality, they are not offering "unlimited" internet access. Time Warner is looking to avoid this kind of litigation. A price structure is thier first solution. But as you've written here in this article...they really aren't providing much of a solution. Sure, grandma and grandpa will pay less if all they do is send e-mails and receive Jpeg images of the grandkids. But for the vast majority of us, we need access to more cheap bandwidth - not less. This type of pricing structure will only lead to angry customers and bad press. This is definatley a bad idea.