Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:39PM EST
See Comments (11)
You've digested my must-know Blu-ray facts; now it's time to go shopping.
Before we begin (and if you haven't read the first part of my buyer's guide, click here to check it out), bear in mind that I'm focusing on a few of the most popular (and relatively inexpensive) players, and prices are sure to fluctuate in the coming weeks. If you want to go high-end and spend $600 or more on a top-of-the-line Blu-ray player, be my guest—but I'm not covering them here.
Panasonic DMP-BD30: $450 and up
Released in the fall, the BD30 was the first Blu-ray player to arrive armed with profile 1.1—good for picture-in-picture "Bonus View" commentaries. The Panny deck also supports Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio, a pair of cutting-edge "lossless" audio formats, although you'll need a Dolby TrueHD- or DTS-HD-equipped receiver to take advantage of them. Pretty nice, but expect to pay handsomely for it: looking online, I couldn't find the BD30 for anything less than about $450. Ouch.
Samsung BD-P1400: $238 and up
One of the cheapest Blu-ray decks now on the market, the BD-P1400 comes with support for the lossless Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio, and it also boasts an Ethernet port for downloading firmware upgrades. However, the player is saddled with the old 1.0 Blu-ray profile, so you won't be able to watch any picture-in-picture video commentaries. Also, many BD-P1400 owners have complained that some Blu-ray discs won't play properly on the player (specifically, "Ratatouille," "Spider-Man 3," "Live Free or Die Hard," "Blade Runner," and the third "Pirates of the Caribbean"). Samsung has since released a firmware update to fix the bug; that said, who knows if more compatibility problems will crop up.
Sony BDP-S300: $338 and up
Like many of Sony's products, this deck isn't cheap considering what you get—then again, Sony has a great reputation for quality (indeed, I've never had any serious problems with my Sony gadgets), so the S300 might make a good choice for those who don't want to risk spotty performance or deal with firmware updates. Anyway, the S300 is just a Profile 1.0 player, meaning you won't be able to watch picture-in-picture video commentaries on "Bonus View" discs. The deck also lacks the latest in lossless audio formats, so no Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD. Also missing: an Ethernet port for firmware upgrades. That said, standard Dolby Digital and DTS soundtrack support are present and accounted for (and most of us don't have Dolby TrueHD- or DTS-HD-equipped receivers anyway).
40GB Sony PlayStation 3: $399
Yes, it's a gaming console, but the PS3 is considered by many to be the best Blu-ray player bargain on the market. Reviewers have been impressed by the PS3's Blu-ray playback performance, and Blu-ray movies tend to start up faster than on stand-alone decks (it can often take a minute or more for a standard Blu-ray player to fire up). Also, the PlayStation 3's Blu-ray player is the only future-proof deck on the market—that is, you'll be able to upgrade it to the upcoming Profile 2.0 (due this fall). Finally, the PS3 comes with a nice bonus: full-on, next-generation gaming. The downsides? No support for DTS-HD Master Audio (although Dolby TrueHD is supported); also, the PS3 won't work with IR universal remotes like the Harmony 880. Ugh.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Sony sells a Bluetooth remote controller for Blu-Ray playback on the Playstation 3 for about $25. It works fine, so no big deal there. It's true though that the PS3 won't work with typical universal remote controls since the PS3 doesn't use the typical IR or RF control interfaces. The PS3 is ridiculously feature-packed for $399 (built in networking, 40GB hard drive, HD-quality gaming, and oh-yeah.. a future-proof Blu-Ray player from the company that invented the technology). Without question, it has the best feature/price ratio of all the current crop of Blu-Ray players... by a mile.
I love my PS3! Greatest investment ive ever made so far. Especially with the downfall of HDDVD!
Looking to the future of this technology who will DVD recording pay into all of this? My DVD recorder just died and I'm in the market for a new; we use it to record TV shows we don't want to miss so I don't need anything fancy but with everything thats happened with Blu-Ray where does that leave recording?
y_92404 - I obviously can't speak for Ben, but here's why I initially picked up a HD-DVD add-on for my XBox 360. I based my decision on the features that were available with the player at the time along with the cost of the player and media. HD-DVD offered web-downloadable content, no region coding (huge for me as I enjoy a number of shows/movies from other regions), and it was much more affordable for me. I'm confused on your comments about the online features comment. HD DVDs allowed for you to pull live content into your player as you went, but that's not to say that they put all bonus stuff online. Also, you know that Blu-Ray is going to profile 2.0 this fall to achieve the online bonus features (BDLive), right? Anyway, it was those few things, along with the fact that at the time I bought my player, most of the movies I was interested in were HD-DVD titles. Granted, the disk capacity was higher on Blu-Ray, but I didn't see that as a deal-breaker. The capacity on the HD-DVD disks was enough to encode the movies properly for HD viewing along with Dolby TrueHD audio and room for extras. Obviously I picked wrong, since Blu-Ray ended up winning. But I guess I'm just missing something when people always talk about what a "slam-dunk" Blu-Ray was.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by jirojas on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse
I've been using a PS3 for Bluray. I'm satisfied with the picture quality and upscaling of normal DVD's. I don't mind using the wireless controller as remote.