Samsung's New Combo HD Player: Way Too Pricey

Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:40AM EDT

See Comments (28)

Samsung has been teasing us for months about its upcoming dual-format HD player; first, there were only rumors, then word came in April that the Blu-ray/HD DVD player was, indeed, actually coming, but Samsung didn't reveal much beyond that. Today, however, we're getting the main specs, some pictures, a release date (before year's end) and a price: $1,049. Ouch.

The first pictures of the BD-UP5000 are pretty much what you'd expect—a big black box with a your standard digital readout and some blue glowing buttons. Under the hood, however, is the good stuff, including full compatibility with the HDi- and BD-Java-powered interactive extras on both Blu-ray and HD DVD discs, neatly fixing a problem that plagued LG's spotty combo HD player, the BH100. You'll also get full 1080p output for Blu-ray and HD DVD (including 24 frame-per-second playback on Blu-ray discs, making for smoother, more film-like picture), the latest in high-def audio formats (Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD), and an HDMI 1.3 port (which can send both video and Dolby TrueHD/DTS-HD sound to your receiver).

The BD-UP5000 could be a silver bullet for your Blu-ray/HD DVD compatibility woes if money's no object; for the rest of us, however, the $1,049 price tag is simply too high. Why? Because for a total of $800, you can pick up a 60GB PlayStation 3 with a built-in Blu-ray drive ($500) and a cheap Toshiba HD DVD player ($300). Yes, that's two boxes compared to a single BD-UP5000 player, but you'll be getting a next-gen gaming console in the bargain. A Samsung rep admitted to me that the company may lower the BD-UP5000's sky-high price tag depending on market prices in the next few months; let's hope Samsung follows through on that.

Would you cough up $1,000-plus for Samsung's new combo player? 

Comments on Samsung's New Combo HD Player: Way Too Pricey

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by dterresiii on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    No I wouldn't pay a thousand or even 500. How much did they realy spend on development, and how fast do they want to recoup the cost? I can wait 'till they are two to three hundred.

  • 2 Posted by matt_archbold2002 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    That is way over priced. I bet there will be dual players in 6 months with a 800 dollar pricetag or lower. Last year the cheapest bluray player was 1000.00, now you can get a ps3 or a standalone bluray player for 500. I personally wouldnt bother. Why pay 1050.00 when you can get a PS3, and Toshiba HDDVD player, 10 free DVD's, and another 150-200 on whatever your tech-heart desired for the same price? Ben, you got it right. Samsung... Nice try (same goes for LG's multi format player).

  • 3 Posted by coletanco on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    LGs issue with their dual format player was they had yet to secure the proper rights for the HD-DVD format and rushed the unit to market. There by leaving out the extra features of HD-DVD out. I've heard through many people at LG that a new player is in development/ready for market with full capabilities for both formats. Hopefully it'll beat the pants off the $1000+ price tag of the Samsung unit. But considering the price of the inept BH100 is about right there, I wouldn't count on it.

  • 4 Posted by h2mtylasilla on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    well i would not end i mind not pay $1100 dollars 4 that way pay that amount when all u have 2 do is wait a couple of months and more then likely you'll get it for half the price

  • 5 Posted by commorancy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    I do not buy anything Samsung. This brand has proven time and time again to be of inferior quality. My boss bought 3 LCD Samsung monitors and within 1 year, each of the monitors had black streaky messes all over the edges. Each of these displays is now worthless. The screens simply look horrible. I've had friends who have bought Samsung phones that have lasted less than 6 months before they died. I just don't trust any products released by this company. There are far too many companies producing higher quality electronics products than Samsung. This company is certainly trying to be a Sony or a Panasonic, but they simply aren't. If you're going to pay top dollar for an item, choose a respected and well established brand... not Samsung.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.