Apple Delays "Leopard" Release, Blames iPhone

Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:21PM EDT

See Comments (2)

Disappointing news from Cupertino today, as Apple announced that it's pushing back the release of Leopard, the much-anticipated new version of Mac OS X, so that another big name product—the iPhone—could make it out the door on time.

Mac OS 10.5, a.k.a. Leopard, was slated to arrive in June with such new features as automated backups and an improved e-mail app. But Apple announced today that Leopard won't see the light of day until October, because it had to "borrow" engineers and quality-assurance workers from the OS group for the iPhone team, which is facing a June release date.

The news represents a rare slice of humble pie for Apple, which prides itself on hitting ship dates and regularly tweaks Microsoft for missing its own; indeed, there was talk last year that Leopard might actually beat Vista in stories, but clearly, that ain't happening now.

So, how bad is the news for us Macheads? Personally, I'm disappointed but somewhat shy of devastated. While I'm always eager to load up the latest iteration of the Mac OS, Leopard looks like more of an incremental release than Mac OS 10.4 "Tiger", which introduced us to Spotlight universal search, RSS feeds in Safari, the Automator for auto task repetition, and the Dashboard. While the promised Time Machine auto-backup utility certainly sounds cool, most of Leopold's new features are basically improvements on existing apps. All that said, October sure feels like a long ways away.

Related:
Apple delays launch of operating system [Yahoo! News]
Mac OS 10.5 Leopard page
 

Comments on Apple Delays "Leopard" Release, Blames iPhone

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by kinserfr on Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:41AM EST Report Abuse

    At least you are eager to install OS X updates instead of facing them with trepidation. Also, I buy Apple's excuse or at least it was plausible as opposed to M$ lame excuses.

  • 2 Posted by thetrueheadfoot on Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:24PM EST Report Abuse

    Go ahead and waste 129$ for a backup program you can buy for 30$ from a third party for XP. Its a great idea, I promise.

More Posts: First Prev 1 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.