Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:12PM EST
See Comments (14)
Here's a scenario that "Survivor" fans know well: two equally matched voting blocks stuck in a stalemate, with a single, undecided player suddenly the key to the game. Both sides wine and dine the holdout, hoping to break the tie. The two tribes are Blu-ray and HD DVD. The holdout? Warner Brothers, the last major movie studio still making HD discs in both formats. And according to BusinessWeek, the wooing has reached a fever pitch.
The news magazine reports that representative from both camps are reaching out—way out—to Warner Brothers, with Toshiba HD DVD business lead Yoshihide Fujii making three trips to the United States in recent months, while Sony CEO and Blu-ray proponent Sir Howard Stringer has been personally making his case to top execs at Time Warner, the parent company of Warner Brothers.
The stakes are high for the warring HD camps. Blu-ray has exclusive deals with Disney, Sony (natch, given Sony's massive stake in Blu-ray), Fox, and MGM, while HD DVD has Universal, Paramount, and DreamWorks. The HD DVD group lured Paramount and DreamsWorks (which had previously supported both formats) earlier this year, and Sony clearly hopes to strike back by getting Warners to go Blu-ray-only.
The BusinessWeek story argues that Blu-ray may have the edge in the wooing, for a couple of reasons: It has a base of 2.7 million players (including Blu-ray-equipped PlayStation 3 consoles) in the United States, compared to 750,000 for HD DVD (including Xbox 360 add-on HD drives), and Blu-ray discs have been outselling HD DVD at a two-to-one ratio in recent weeks. All true...although cheaper HD DVD stand-alone players easily won the Black Friday sales way with a 62 percent market share, compared to just 37 percent for Blu-ray.
So, let's say Warners did jump to one camp or the other come next month, when the curtain rises on CES in Vegas. Would such a move be a knockout blow for the loser? I doubt it. Both camps have serious backing—Toshiba, Unversal, and Microsoft all have stakes in HD DVD, with Sony the big muscle on the Blu-ray side—and each side still has studio exclusives locked in (Paramount, which distributes hits like "Transformers," is signed with HD DVD until about 2009, and Disney, with franchises like "Pirates of the Caribbean," is cozy with Blu-ray). I think this war has a good 12 months (or more) to go, regardless of what Warners does.
That said, if Warner Brothers does go ahead and choose a side, it'll be a blow for those of us who already have HD players of one format for another (Warners has some big movies in its catalog...you've heard of "The Matrix" and "Batman," right?), although it'll make pricey but slowly-getting-cheaper dual-format HD decks that much more attractive.
What do you think? Will Warners choose a side? Would that matter to you if you're shopping for an HD disc player?
Related:
Next-Gen DVDs: Advantage, Sony [BusinessWeek, via High-Def Digest]
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
this war between Blueray and HD DVD would never end,in my opion if you want to watch High definition movie,make sure you buy the player that can play both format,regardless who would leading the market.
Still waiting on the sidelines. First, my HDTV (1080i)cannot even play the disks at full DEF (1080p). Second, I have a lot invested in current DVDs. Third, I am very happy with my upconvert DVD player - DVDs never looked so good. Last - way, way too much money for a player on either side. I have not paid over $150 for a DVD player, and my current upconvert Philips was $40 at Wal-Mart. Get a good dual player out there for less than $200, and I will think about it.
Dual format player is a must until the dust settles. This war is driven not only by the choice of movies, but of course the power behind the gaming industry. It's sad that consumers are largely left in the dark about the incompatibilities between the two formats. Granted, plenty of information is available online for research, but a large number of people are still is unaware of the caveat when purchasing their player. Take a listen to the people shopping for HD disc players at your local electronics store. You will be surprised how little people really know about this format war!!
ralph, you are 1000% (yes, 1000%) correct. People don't really know much about either format. They just buy into the marketing they hear about it. As everyone should know, unless you're a foot away from the screen that is over 50" or so, there is no difference between 720p, 1080i, and 1080p. Let me preface the rest of this by saying that I already have half a dozen or so movies in each format, so don't think I hate one and love the other. For people who fight for Blu-Ray like Sony is paying them - Is the Blu-Ray spec finalized yet? Is your player profile 1.0? 1.1? 2.0? Do you know the differences between them? The HD DVD spec was final before they sold any players. Over a year later, the BDA can't figure out when they want to stop changing the spec to get people ticked at them for haveing a movie that won't work 100% on their player. Or do you just see 1080p vs. 1080i and assume Blu-Ray is superior? HD DVD's are in 1080p and players also display them that way. If your TV is native 1080p, the TV de-interlaces the picture and you see it in 1080p anyway. Blu-Ray does have a higher bit rate, but did that help movies like The Fifth Element at all? We all remember that one, right? The original release was so bad they remastered it and let people trade it in for free. It's all in the compression. VC-1 that HD DVD uses is pretty efficient, and studios will only get better at it. Everyone says that Blu-Ray does have more studio support, but how many of those studios are owned by Sony? Did you even know that HD DVD actually has more studios behind it? Check out dvdempire.com, and click the HD DVD or Blu-Ray tabs. The side of the page has a quick listing of number of titles and studios. HD DVD has a smaller disc, ignoring the 51GB disc that may or may not work on all players. I'm guessing not otherwise Toshiba would be all over that in the news. I saw someone on a forum post saying that HD DVD "only" has room for 5 hours vs. Blu-Ray's 8 hours (or something close to that), both on dual-layer discs. How many 5 hour movies are out there? There's still plenty of room for extras, and there's always the option of a second disc for extras. On the HD DVD side, MS could have helped a lot by putting the player right on the 360 like Sony did with the PS3. Things might be a little more even sales-wise then. And I really think both sides should have spent more time coming up with one format so we wouldn't have to deal with this stupid format war. My $0.02 Let the bashing of my post begin in 3...2...1...
The Logitech Harmony 880 and 890 remotes actually do what they promise: they let you control all you ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by gregorylopez4881 on Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:21PM EST Report Abuse
I'm not sure which side they're going to choose but I'm going to wait for a clear-cut winner before I choose a format. Good article...