Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:36AM EST
See Comments (3)
Music labels are trying to get creative to derail the steady flow of pirated music on college campuses. The latest initiative comes from Ruckus Networks, which now makes music downloads available free to college students.
All you need is an email address ending in .edu, but Ruckus will ask faculty members and alumni to pay $8.95 a month for the service. Four major music labels and several independents are licensing their music to Ruckus at lower rates because they know college students are sharing music illegally rather than paying the typical $15 a month for some online music services.
In its first incarnation, Ruckus made the service available on college campuses where schools paid for the service, but only 20 schools signed up, the New York Times reports. So the company switched to an advertising-supported model, so kids have to listen to a few ads in exchange for free downloads.
From the there's-no-such-thing-as-a-free-lunch file, however, the catch is the music is only free if it stays on students' computers. Ruckus uses Microsoft's Windows media technology, so for $4.99 a month, songs can be transferred to portable music players that support only Microsoft's format, including SanDisk and Creative players---but not on the Zune! And forget playing them on iPods, period.
Despite student protests, Ruckus reports that 60 percent of students on campuses which offer the Ruckus service are registering for it. At the very least, they can listen to music on their computers and decide if they want to procure songs they like another way for their MP3 players.
Related links:
Why College Kids are Turning Down Free (Legal) Music
A Survey of U.S. Universities Peer-to-Peer Policies
P2P Primer for Parents
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
So, I would have to keep track of which songs came from napster and remember to delete them when I graduate in a year and a half? sounds like a hassle, IMHO. If I wanted loaned music, I can switch on the radio, or borrow a CD from a friend. I'd much rather sheck out the few bucks to actually download a real song and be able to keep it, or just stick to the radio which is just as free as ever.
I think that it's just a big hoopla. If the radio is free we can get an old tape, put in in the tape player, and press "record" and walk around with this "recorded" music on our tape in our old walkmans and put in our cars that still have tape players in them; don't you think that its the same method as getting on your computer, going on your downloading program, picking out that song that you wanted, hitting the downloading button, and having it stored on your computer or then putting it on your mpg player or cd? If the recording industry is yapping over sharing music then they have to yap at kids back in the late 90's getting their tapes out and dubbing music from their friends. Oh..and for the bootleggers dubbing music from artist who put their albums on tapes.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by connieluayon on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse
Makes me want to go back to college ;o)