Wed May 16, 2007 4:27AM EDT
See Comments (7)
According to the article, sending an "offensive, embarrassing or downright rude" message is better known as flaming, and is a problem that continues to plague virtual communications. This "online disinhibition effect" happens when people show less restraint in cyberspace, than if they were face to face. John Suler, a psychologist at Rider University, says there are some factors that lead to online disinhibition:
Comments on blog have gotten so out of control, Tim O'Reilly even called for a "Blogger's Code of Conduct" after a technology blogger received death threats from an anonymous commenter on her blog. One of his suggestions is taking responsibility for your own words and the comments you allow on your blog. While I wholeheartedly agree that bloggers and commenters shouldn't ever be censored, I do believe in setting up guidelines that protect both the blogger and its audience. Forums and other websites have always been moderated in order to keep a level of civility within the community. And this was happening way before blogs ever came into existence.
Speaking from experience, I recommend you stay away from sending or writing anything you might regret later. We're living in a time when people will save, forward, or publish your email on their blogs just to draw a crowd and hurt you publicly. The next time you feel like sending a flaming email or you receive one, do the following instead:
Anyone want to offer any other advice or experience they've had online? Let me know in the comments below.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
oh, im sure a lot of viewers appreciate the content of the article. Well i dont know, but i dont seem to be some one that would vent out her angerish online. But i do like this advice very well, even though i've only done this once in my life
Good article for newbies, in fact it should be 'required reading'. Myself, spending FAR more time on Usenet than I'd care to admit,(back in the early/mid 90's, before it became a total spam repository), frequenting such groups as alt.flame, alt.fan.Karl-Malden.nose, alt.usenet.kooks, alt.alien-vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk.....etc etc. Jeez, it's been so long, the exact names elude me, a dash here, or a dot there, nevertheless, hanging out in the "alt" hierarchy, on Usenet in those groups, "flaming" was considered an art form, like performance art. As was "trolling"(i.e.fishing for a reaction). For example; I recall a particular thread that was "cross posted" into alt.animals.dolphins, called "Dolphins are FISH!!!!", which brings us 'round to 'Kooks' and 'trolling',a title like that, and a fake argument cross posted into a dolphin lovers group was a blatantly obvious "Troll", but inevitably some kook from a.a.d, would respond thereby setting off a "flame war". The thread was cross posted to more groups, bringing MORE people into the fray! In most serious groups, like that one, the more "sane" members would warn the kook "DON'T FEED THE TROLLS", in other words, by engaging, you're giving them the sport they want, which was ultimately to throw the group into chaos. Okay, I'm rambling here but my point is (I actually HAD a point);o) it's just as true now as it was then, DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS! (or wrestle with a pig) lol.I know a lot of people haven't a clue what Usenet is [or was] ,or what a newsreader is,(they use NNTP as opposed to HTTP) and how Usenet functions (it's NOT the internet), it's similar to net forums, except that, the 'thread' keeps growing, so rather than having post/re: post/re:, ALL of the previous posts are included in the new post, making it MUCH easier to understand who is replying to who, if that makes sense, each new post is written underneath the last, which is marked by a or for the post before that, the one before *that* and so on. Then at the top of your news reader, you could add whatever groups you'd like, and your post would go to 4,5,6,7, however many groups you want it "cross posted" to. I know it sounds kind of complicated(Go to "Google/Groups" for the FAQ), but I thought a little back story was needed. So to sum up (finally) if you've read this far ;o), because of starting my net usage there, it's very easy for me to spot the trolls. Also to NOT respond until I can do so eloquently, and not come off looking like a hot headed fool. I'll shut up now, hope this helped, and didn't confuse, that was NOT my intention.I can't believe I just wrote a 2600 character comment LOL!
oops, my bad. I guess the rss/xml parser sees greater than, and less than signs as HTML, and so, deletes them making my previous comment rather difficult to understand right here; (BEGIN QUOTED TEXT) ...how Usenet functions (it's NOT the internet), it's similar to net forums, except that, the 'thread' keeps growing, so rather than having; ( post | post | post, separately), ALL of the previous posts are included in the new post,(not unlike an email "conversation") making it MUCH easier to understand who is replying to who, if that makes sense, the only appreciable difference being that, each new post is written *underneath* the last, which is marked by a (less than sign) or (two Less than signs)for the post before that,(three )for the one before *that* and so on. (END QUOTED TEXT) That way the entire thread reads as if it were one long conversation (hence, adding your reply at the BOTTOM of the post, rather than the TOP) "Top posting" would usually wind up getting you 'flamed' as a "clueless newbie" LOL. In THOSE groups, it was always best to "lurk" for a bit, to give you an idea of what kind of posts got flamed, and what was deemed acceptable by the group.
I do not see where mosy of your note has ANY validity whatsoever, excepting the death threat part. Why do you differentiate an e-mail with a regular letter? After all folks, that is what an e-mail actually is...........a letter. Since the advent of the computer age, the written word via regular mail, ie:~ Canada Post, U.S. Mail, etcetera, has all but disappeared from the horizon. If a person wishes to blast off at another person with words perhaps too hot to handle, what's the big deal? You seem to think you have the right to chastise those who use the internet to voice their opinions, albiet perhaps not to your liking. Good luck with that, "bon chance" too. Personally, if I want to use the internet to blast off at whoever, please don't interfere with my right to express myself in whatever manner I so choose. Thtanks for listening to me blasting off at you through the medium of the internet. Have a great weekend. Rae
The Samsung Blast from T-Mobile is a good phone, relatively cheap, and easy to use. How's that possi ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by billionarious@sbcglobal.net on Wed May 16, 2007 5:19PM EDT Report Abuse
What? Twelve hours since posting and still no comment? Hmmm. Cold feet. I once sent an email that was the equivalent of a raging rant, and then had no fun at all extricating my foot from my mouth later on. Yes, it's much better to THINK before you act on strong feelings! Thank you for sharing.