Tue May 20, 2008 5:57AM EDT
See Comments (6)
I'm still not entirely sure what makes a company gay-friendly, but a recent
survey by Planet Out and Prime Access found that more than two-thirds of
gays and lesbians are more likely to purchase from gay-friendly companies. According
to the survey, companies perceived to be the most gay-friendly include Apple,
Bravo, Levi's, Absolut, Starbucks, and American Express, while Samsung, Cracker
Barrel, Exxon Mobil, and Wal-Mart were the least gay-friendly.
Confused about what makes a company gay-friendly? You're not alone. Sixty-four percent of the respondents didn't know how to determine if a company were gay-friendly either, but those who managed to discern the gay-friendly vibe said they did so from the company's advertising, the media, and their friends' input.
I can see how Bravo, American Express, and Apple can be perceived as gay-friendly, but American Airlines, Target and Saturn also ranked high on the list which adds to the confusion. Kevyn Aiken, Vice President of Marketing at PlanetOut, says gays and lesbians are powerful consumers, more so than straight consumers, so it would be in a company's best interest to be perceived as gay-friendly, but how do they do that?
One thing's for sure, the companies that ranked high do have sexier advertising campaigns and products than say Cracker Barrel, Dunkin' Donuts, or Exxon Mobil, so maybe that's the secret of their success among the gay community. What do you think?
Do you think it's fair to say one company is more gay-friendly than another based on marketing alone?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Not sure why the last half of my post got cut off, but here it is. There is one point in Gina%
Almost like staynput, Wouldn't it be great if companies were more human aware? This sounds as much of a 'bandwagon' marketing concept as the green thing.
Im a lesbain and find this annoying. The only people that care are the activist. They should just get some starbucks and let the ----- go.
As I said, I know there are reasons. And I did not intend to compare the two organizations. One went about effecting change peacefully, while the other used violence. So no, they're not close to the same. It was a bad comparison. My point was that I think it's wrong that one group of people have an organization that promotes their members and is generally accepted by society, while the other does not. I wouldn't support an organization that promotes and tries to gain advantage for white people any more than I support the NAACP. I do not support any organization that trys to promote a particular segment of society. Organizations that support a specific cause, yes. But not those promoting specific segments of the population. Again, I think all people should be treated with respect and dignity.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by kola10002000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:53PM EDT Report Abuse
Why waste money advertising to such a small market turning off the very large market?