Criticism grows over IRS cell phone rules

Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:39AM EDT

See Comments (17)

Bet you didn't even know: If you use a cell phone for work (one provided by your company), you're supposed to keep a detailed log of every call you make on that phone, recording whether each call is for work or for personal use. If you don't, and even if 100 percent of the calls are for work purposes, your employer, by law, can't consider your phone a business expense. Instead, it has to consider the phone a perk provided by the company, which means its value has to be treated as taxable income to you.

If this sounds crazy it's because virtually no one follows the letter of the law on this issue. (If anyone out there has a work-provided cell phone and has the value of its service tacked on to their W-2 at the end of the year, let me know.) But it is the law, and it's basically remained unchanged since cell phone service began as an outrageous luxury for the rich in 1989.

While most employers have simply been ignoring the law—the same way that no one itemizes and pays taxes on out-of-state purchases—the IRS has of late been cracking down on the issue. According to the L.A. Times, UCLA got slapped with a $239,000 bill for back taxes because employees hadn't been keeping the aforementioned logs. UC San Diego received a similar, $186,000 bill. The University of California system provides some 13,000 workers with University-issued cell phones, so its potential liability is huge. Nationally, 5.5 million people have phones provided by their employers, which must have IRS agents' eyes lighting up with giant dollar signs like Scrooge McDuck.

The good news? Our Congressmen are trying to ride to the rescue to change the law that requires the absurd recordkeeping. Both the House and Senate have pending legislation to take cell phones off the list of taxable fringe benefits, and even the IRS' Advisory Committee now considers the rules to be overly "burdensome for any employer" and recommended relaxing the requirements.

See more details from the Times at the link below, including this gem of a quote from Texas Representative Sam Johnson: "In 1989 when cellphones were huge and when it cost a lot of money to make a phone call. Nowadays they're a dime a dozen and the cost is way down. If you don't log all your telephone calls, you're going to have some IRS weenie after you. That's why we're trying to get the law changed—because it just doesn't make any sense anymore."

LINK: IRS cellphone rule called outmoded

Comments on Criticism grows over IRS cell phone rules

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 7 Posted by samkel43085 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    And if I had a nickel for every time my employer called me on my own personal cell phone...........

  • 8 Posted by blake49504 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    Lets figure this out, they tax your employer for making money to pay for the phone, they tax your wages you make using the phone, they tax your phone bill, they tax you for use of the phone, and now they want you to pay another tax for the "gift" your company gave you to make more taxable money, hmmmm, time to dust off the ol' indian suits and make some tea in Boston harbor.

  • 9 Posted by monteverde2 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    I work for a local goverment agency as the Telecom Manger and this happens to be one of my duties. Every month we have to make sure that everyone with one of the 408 cell phones turns in their phone bills marked with if the calls were personal or business related plus they have reimburse the Agency for the personal calls. Granted this is so that they aren't making personal calls on the taxpayers dollars but it isn't that hard in all honesty. Takes each person maybe five minutes out of their day.

  • 11 Posted by jrusso2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    Here's the thing: the bigger you folks let your government grow, the more money they need and the more industrious and creative they will get! Less government = less intrusion

  • 13 Posted by danman9262 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    A compromise solution was developed by our state university system ... we indicated our percentage of use that we estimated was personal (20%) and that was added to our taxable income ... we were ok with that

  • 14 Posted by bummerbabe on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    it isn't a matter of going through your bills to show what each call was for, it is if you were keeping a log at the time you made each of those calls from the day you started using the phone. Who knew........

  • 15 Posted by tcn822@ymail.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    10% flat tax on all income regardless of expense, even for corporations....who has time to keep track of all this BS. Hard enough to keep the darn mileage log and all other expenses in line, now this!

  • 16 Posted by teewarren on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    There you go....some doof that works for the government actually HAS the time to look at mobile logs. That is a VERY WISE use of our resources, and I hope that when we pass the FAIR TAX that this guy is the first to go.

  • 17 Posted by teewarren on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    Oh, and I forgot to add, 408 cell phones, x 5 minutes a day, times 50 weeks equals 8,500 man hours. At inflated federal wages, that's about a quarter of a million dollars lost to productivity. But then again, when you have a blank checkbook....

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.