It ain't easy to speed up a country this big

Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:13PM EDT

See Comments (14)

Once again, the gadflies are hovering around the issue that broadband penetration in the U.S. has slowed way down, and dredging up the old news that U.S. broadband speed is comparatively dog slow compared to the rest of the world.

Is it really that bad? Sure, I'd love to have the 60-plus megabits per second that the average Japanese broadband subscriber has access to, but the logistics of offering such a service on a national scale in a country as large as the U.S. are nightmarish. The U.S. is 25 times larger in area than Japan, and 96 times larger than South Korea, the other big broadband high-flyer.

I took a look at the 20 countries where broadband penetration is the highest (they're ranked from top to bottom in the chart above), and compared the average broadband speed (per the recent Explaining International Broadband Leadership study, page 6 [PDF]) to the geographical area of each country. I then multiplied the two numbers together to give a sense of how many Mbps are available per thousand square kilometers of sheer land that has to be covered. (Higher numbers indicate faster coverage over more land.)

 

The exercise is simplistic but the results are interesting, if expected: Smaller countries generally have faster broadband. The bigger nations, including the U.S., Australia, and Canada, lag far behind. (Canada is considerably better off than the U.S. is, with a 7.6Mbps average vs. our 4.9Mbps average, but consider how much of the country is unpopulated. And yes, I know we have Alaska, too, but still...)

What's surprising about the chart isn't really how fast a few select countries are but how slow a few very small ones are. Look at Denmark, Switzerland, and Luxembourg: All are very well-off, industrialized countries, and all are very small (Luxembourg has just 3,000 square km to manage, about the same size as Rhode Island). All of them have slower broadband service on average than we do in the U.S.

Do we have room for improvement? Absolutely, and I believe higher-speed broadband is on the way. Regardless, the numbers aren't so grim that would should hang our heads in shame.

Comments on 4th of July fireworks photography tips

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by pb_enial on Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    Thanks for the tip. Just bought a Canon A480.

  • 2 Posted by alexgannis on Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    You're 100% correct thanks, I made some great shot last year on my Canon 40D ISO 100 bulb setting. bulb is not a fla----- s a setting in pro camera manuel mode.

  • 3 Posted by lubbcraig on Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:17AM EDT Report Abuse

    i guess this is a yearly post for you eh? XD

  • 4 Posted by rogueist on Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:20AM EDT Report Abuse

    You forgot the most important tip - dont stand over the fireworks expecting to catch a firecracker (or M80) exploding on the ground, or a bottle rocket or roman candle as they launch.

  • 5 Posted by gullwingdoors on Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:13AM EDT Report Abuse

    Good article. I think I'll try some of this stuff with my A590IS. Another tip for those whose camera does not have those settings, if it is a Cannon, try the CHDK firmware. http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK It adds a ton of extra features including the ones mentioned in this article (rapid fire, long exposures, etc).

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.