It ain't easy to speed up a country this big

Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:13PM EDT

See Comments (14)

Once again, the gadflies are hovering around the issue that broadband penetration in the U.S. has slowed way down, and dredging up the old news that U.S. broadband speed is comparatively dog slow compared to the rest of the world.

Is it really that bad? Sure, I'd love to have the 60-plus megabits per second that the average Japanese broadband subscriber has access to, but the logistics of offering such a service on a national scale in a country as large as the U.S. are nightmarish. The U.S. is 25 times larger in area than Japan, and 96 times larger than South Korea, the other big broadband high-flyer.

I took a look at the 20 countries where broadband penetration is the highest (they're ranked from top to bottom in the chart above), and compared the average broadband speed (per the recent Explaining International Broadband Leadership study, page 6 [PDF]) to the geographical area of each country. I then multiplied the two numbers together to give a sense of how many Mbps are available per thousand square kilometers of sheer land that has to be covered. (Higher numbers indicate faster coverage over more land.)

 

The exercise is simplistic but the results are interesting, if expected: Smaller countries generally have faster broadband. The bigger nations, including the U.S., Australia, and Canada, lag far behind. (Canada is considerably better off than the U.S. is, with a 7.6Mbps average vs. our 4.9Mbps average, but consider how much of the country is unpopulated. And yes, I know we have Alaska, too, but still...)

What's surprising about the chart isn't really how fast a few select countries are but how slow a few very small ones are. Look at Denmark, Switzerland, and Luxembourg: All are very well-off, industrialized countries, and all are very small (Luxembourg has just 3,000 square km to manage, about the same size as Rhode Island). All of them have slower broadband service on average than we do in the U.S.

Do we have room for improvement? Absolutely, and I believe higher-speed broadband is on the way. Regardless, the numbers aren't so grim that would should hang our heads in shame.

Comments on It ain't easy to speed up a country this big

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by kupriaa1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    $200? Yeah right..for the first three months..and you sign a 20 year agreement agreeing to pay $500 a month. And no upgrades to service and you will only get three channels. Thats how they roll.

  • 7 Posted by cnull on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    kupriaa1 - You're right, there are additional factors at work, but sheer size is, in my mind, an unquestionably big hurdle to get over. Upgrading the backbone is even, in part, an issue of geography...

  • 8 Posted by agustin2489 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think we're well off regardless. I just want better switches from point to point so that I can get a faster speed. The backbone isn't largely what needs upgrading; it's the switches that process where which data goes.

  • 9 Posted by anson_lego on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    Since we're bigger, we'll need better wires and tech. The longer the wire and length, the less power that travels through so it will be more expensive.

  • 10 Posted by cyrusthevirus81@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm just happy to have gone from 6-768kbs to 10-1.5. That said I wish I were in a Verizon area.

  • 11 Posted by mlee2448@flash.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have internet at 3kbs which is slower than what I get on my Blackjack 2. So why don't the internet companies spend some money to get high speed internet to people on dailup. By the way I 2 miles from the Interstate.

  • 12 Posted by henryvalz on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    Given the devaluation of the US dollar, and the fact that within a few years the US will be a $10 Trillion dollars of debt, it is likely that US communication companies will get bought up by foreign corporations within the next few years. It will be interesting to see what German or French telecomms are able to do, or if they will even bother with the backbone of our infrastructure.

  • 13 Posted by richaull on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    There aint going to be no frogs or krauts buying anyone out. Just because the dollar is down and the nation has incurred debt does not mean telcomms are going to sell their baby. Sheesh.

  • 14 Posted by shaftbmf21 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is an important issue! this will enhances efforts like: http://www.digitalcribs.net/DisplayVideo.aspx?id=971429333

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.