Mon Sep 1, 2008 11:52PM EDT
See Comments (27)
Who doesn't want another couple of seconds shaved off their startup or application load time, or an extra few frames per second in their favorite game?
Windows tweakers will go to outrageous tweaks to "tune up" their systems, but how many of those tweaks actually do any good? The truth: Just about none.
Lifehacker has one of the most comprehensive looks at the common performance tweak advice I've seen. It pretty much dismisses everything you might have heard as bunk. Among the highlights:
A couple of points on the post are a little more controversial.
Yes, turning off services can destabilize your system, but there is plenty of stuff in the average Windows services list that is total junk: Various quick-launchers, duplicate management utilities, and the like. The problem comes in knowing what you can disable and what you need to keep your machine stable. Lifehacker offers good advice in suggesting you show only non-Windows services before you start hacking away, but its suggestion that some people may actually want to hang on to the useless Windows Defender is silly. Contrary to Lifehacker's advice, disabling unneeded services will likely make your rig more stable, not less.
Finally there's the issue of registry cleaner utilities. Lifehacker says never to use them, but I've seen the proof in the pudding: Seriously slow systems can benefit from a registry cleaning, at least when it comes to startup time. Yes, your best advice is to upgrade the amount of RAM in your machine, but I disagree that Registry cleaners never work.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
These posts are good: here are the highlights to note: The idiot who talks about 16GB of ram for VISTA is a n00b. Most of us 32BITVista users cannot even exceed the 3GB maximum. Only 64BitVISTA will allow an expanded ram set. Even then you wouldnt need more than maybe 6 or 8GB tops! Its not that slow people sheesh. Also 64BIT Vista doesnt come with your system, you have to cough up the extra money for it. For the gentlemen asking about FRESH FORMATS... Yes they are wonderful! Its part of maintinence in my book. I do it at least once a year, just dont forget to backup. As the poster previously said: "Over the course of our computer usage, we INSTALL, we UNINSTALL, we play this or that" Problem is simply by using windows in a normal fashion leaves behind little pieces of erronerous information. Those little pieces of information add up, and that adds to slower boot times and decresed processing power during usage.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 Posted by shdwsng on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:18PM EDT Report Abuse
Vista 32 bit is able to read up to 4 gigabytes of RAM with Service Pack 1. If not that pack, then an update that is available now. To the Mac crowd-Yes, it's a good system. Solid, reliable, and with -maybe- a fourth of the programs available for it that the various Windows versions have. Linux? Same problem, except finding programs is even harder. Yes, there are more efficient alternatives out there, but they have their downsides as well. As a gamer, when I can load every game I've got on either Linux or a Mac, I'll consider quitting Windows. Until then, I'll use what supports the uses I have for my computer. Regardless, the point about locking down processes at startup with an iron fist is probably the best tip for increasing performance in here short of "More Memory Please".