Tue Sep 2, 2008 4:56PM EDT
See Comments (39)
Years ago, rumors made the rounds that Google was working on a web browser of its own. But then Firefox came out and Google seems to love the 'Fox folks (and in fact last week extended an agreement giving them cash and engineering help through 2011), so most figured the GBrowser had fallen off the table.
Imagine the industry's surprise then when Google Chrome was formally announced yesterday, abruptly introducing a fourth major browser (don't forget Safari!) to the rapidly fragmenting stew of web surfing apps.
The first public beta of Chrome became available for download just a few hours ago. I've been using it all day (and am actually composing this post using Chrome), and wanted to provide some (admittedly early) thoughts about the browser for those who want to crawl on the bleeding edge.
Chrome's big selling point will be of only minimal interest to the bulk of web users out there: a new architecture that, in a nutshell, compartmentalizes each tab along with its own process. The upshot is that if one tab crashes, it won't take down your whole browser, but will only crash that tab. Anyone who's had a dozen tabs or windows open at once and seen the whole browser go poof will likely appreciate this feature. (Security should be greatly improved as well.)
Design-wise, Chrome is familiar yet new. Tabs now appear along the very top of the window, above the address bar, and there is no text menu bar available at all. You can access a few simple options through an options icon, but otherwise, there are no traditional functions to be found. By default there's not even a home icon! (If you want to save a page, for example, you'll have to right-click it instead of going to the File menu.) It will take most users a while to adapt to it, but any web user should have minimal trouble doing so.
Easily the best feature of Chrome is its blazing speed. It's ridiculously fast, seriously. I almost couldn't believe it, but test after test showed that pages loaded about twice as fast with Chrome as they do with both Firefox and the beta of Internet Explorer 8. (Other tests have shown different results, however; so your mileage may vary.) Also good: I've had only one rendering issue with Chrome so far (the "insert link" feature with Yahoo's internal publishing engine; I had to finish this post with Firefox). Other than that one problem, pages look exactly how they're supposed to, making it comparable to Firefox in compatibility and light-years ahead of IE8's laughable, intentionally incompatible rendering engine. Still, I won't be able to use Chrome in day-to-day use, at least for now.
Chrome's default home page is unique, too. Check it out in the image above: Nine screenshots, dynamically chosen from the pages you visit the most. Not sure if it's a gimmick or really useful yet, but it's different. The history view is also impressive, better than any of the alternatives.
The real downside of Chrome is its immaturity. Some of Chrome's attempts at uniqueness just don't work: There's a weird URL auto-fill system that suggests search results (above history results) as you type. For example, as I type "CHR" to try go to "chrisnull.com," Chrome unhelpfully suggests "calgaryhealthregion.ca." I have never once found this feature useful and would prefer Chrome re-split search and the URL bar instead of combining them haphazardly like this.
Of course, features we now take for granted in many browsers are wholly absent here for now. There are no additional toolbars or plug-ins available yet: I can't really live without the Google toolbar's Autofill feature, and the lack of AdBlock and some of Firefox's other major plug-ins is soul crushing. Worst of all, there's no spell check feature, so if there are any typos in this post, I blame Google. (See update below.) Some of this may change with time, but Chrome is intentionally designed, like Google itself, with minimalism in mind.
There's lots more in Chrome that I'm sure I'll discover, but you might want to give it a spin yourself if only to get a look at what's to come. Download it for free (for Windows only, sorry) at this link.
UPDATE: Turns out there is a spell check tool, it just doesn't work on all sites/pages right now, which is why I missed it originally.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Heh - I tried to get it to run, but it doesnt run on my machine at all - it pops up a window for a fraction of a second and that's it. I am not impressed yet... Fastest app to FAIL..
Uh oh - I went back to try to get it again - the first install installed a browser plug in without my knowledge into Firefox. The second install seems to be downloading and installing Chrome itself. I dont like that a new browser plugin got installed behind my back.
It acts like a virus! It only pops up a window briefly then vanishes, installs a browser plugin without saying so, and cannot be un-installed! The uninstaller only beeps at you! Needless to say, this Chrome gets a big fat ZERO from me, and now I am going to have to squeegee my system and find out what it installed and where and remove it all manually to get rid of it from my system.
Wow, absolutely BLAZING fast! I am a web designer and have been a Firefox user for years -- there is really no alternative, as I.E. (insert version here) is and has been a joke on just about any level among I.T. professionals here in the Silicon Valley/Bay Area. I've only used Chrome for a half-day, and realize there is still significant work to be done (it is, after all, still in beta), but leave it to Google to develop a (potential) world-changer. If my company had a half a percent of Google's engineering talent, we'd be making some kind of major impact and perhaps swimming in money. Thank you, Google. Can I please have a job in your cafeteria?
i'm puzzled... i installed Chrome on an XP machine and it was great-- pages loaded quickly and it was stable. now i installed Chrome on a Vista box and it runs slowly, it has already crashed once and is having lots of trouble loading flash. pages are flickering too, weirdly. on Vista, Chrome prompted me to disable flash because flash had locked up, but then the option disappeared moments later. also Vista asked me if i wanted to run Chrome with admin privileges after Chrome crashed. i did so and the experience was no better. very confusing.
update: i just installed Chrome on a 2nd Vista machine and it runs perfectly. now i don't know what to think...
I still think Safari is the best (Well the Mac version that is, I didn't really like the Windows release). I'm still trying to figure out whether Firefox or Chrome takes second place though.
Easy to open the web that we opened it before just click the picture,how about if we have a lot of website opened before, the picture will be small or what ?
Its fast and easy on the eyes.
3 major browsers would have been more right; Safari doesn't count. First impressions is that it's actually pretty good. The multiple processes things is Godsent. And he's not lying when says it's fast. It's significantly faster than FireFox, and scorches IE7. The Incognito Browsing mode (I didn't see it mentioned in article.) is cool, I guess for the perverted husband or 15 year old teen male on family computer. It lets you browse without any files being saved (history, cache, cookies). So far, this could become a browser of choice. I do have a couple issues with flash playing at certain sites (but not youtube)
Why would anyone want a browser that has that cute little clause in the terms that says that google can use ANYTHING you upload for their own purposes? As a web designer that guarantees I will never use it, my creations are my property, they want to pay me they can use it, otherwise, that's a lawsuit waiting to happen. READ THE FINE PRINT FOLKS.
Good to hear your a windows user. Is safari faster than Chrome?
I am with hyphenite read the EULA and then run it is d**m near spyware.
try to figure out how to install a java plug-in. Takes Fellini to figure that out. I uninstalled it dueto its lack of ability to work with gaming sites that require java. Then when you try to install it you cannot find the chrome file to install it to.
Sorry Chris. Only you are to blame for your spelling mistakes. Not Google. It's called personal responsibility. Look into it. :)
I agree, looks like Opera, which is already out in a stable version for the Mac! If you take things away from the menu bar, blind people will not be able to use your product.
Aside from the stated advantage of having each tab in its own process (protecting you from a single tab crash), it is also useful if you have several tabs open when the LegitimateSoundingBlog.com automatically forwards you to MalwareRus.com. In Firefox/IE you would have to open Task Manager, kill the browser, not reopen your lost tabs and hope you can find the other pages again. With Chrome, just open the Chrome Task Manager and kill the bad tab.
I managed to remove Chrome from my system. I found it also did a secret install of Google Gears on my machine as well, and it installed the application in a non-standard location too, and put some dubious stuff into the registry. I highly doubt anyone in the security field will use this browser beyond attempting to try it once for curiosity.
I see a home icon in the screenshot. What's he talking about?
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by miggy_san45 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:19PM EDT Report Abuse
chris, you mean fifth major browser, right? never forget opera.