Chipmaker AMD splitting into two companies

Tue Oct 7, 2008 10:50AM EDT

See Comments (5)

Beleaguered Advanced Micro Devices, which has languished behind Intel as a technology innovator for two years now, is preparing to split itself into two pieces, which some see as a last ditch effort to keep a presence in the CPU market.

The move has been rumored for months but the details are nonetheless decidedly unusual: Two Abu Dhabi investment firms will pour $6 billion (or more) into the two companies, the temporarily-named Foundry Company (which will manufacture chips) and the Advanced Technology Investment Company (which will own the rest of AMD's assets, including the company that ultimately designs chips). The bulk of the $6 billion will go toward building new fabs and upgrading existing ones: The first new manufacturing facility will be built near Albany, New York

The big change with this new setup is that AMD's design arm will be able to do design work for other companies while Foundry will be able to produce other people's chips as a contractor. I'm not entirely clear why the company couldn't do this under its old structure, but the hefty monetary investment at least allows AMD to compete a little better in this cutthroat market. For those who don't know the history, Intel fell asleep at the wheel in the early 2000s, pumping out faster, hotter, and buggier Pentium chips while AMD went 64-bit with the Athlon and Opteron, immediately vaulting past Intel in performance. Intel finally got its act together and struck back in 2006 with the streamlined Core line of CPUs and immediately retook the lead. Try as it might, AMD has basically offered nothing that's been able to compete with Core ever since.

Will it work? In today's economic climate, anything seems worth a shot. One aspect of the new deal is that AMD could now actually start producing chips for Intel: In fact it already has a license to do so. But the interactions between the two AMD spinoff companies are bound to be complex and likely problematic to some degree. Anyone who remembers all the headaches that Palm went through when it spun off its hardware and software divisions into separate entities and tried to get them to operate independently will know what a mess this could end up being. If you need more evidence, just look where Palm is now.

Here's to wishing good luck for AMD during and after the transition.

Comments on 4th of July fireworks photography tips

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by pb_enial on Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    Thanks for the tip. Just bought a Canon A480.

  • 2 Posted by alexgannis on Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    You're 100% correct thanks, I made some great shot last year on my Canon 40D ISO 100 bulb setting. bulb is not a fla----- s a setting in pro camera manuel mode.

  • 3 Posted by lubbcraig on Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:17AM EDT Report Abuse

    i guess this is a yearly post for you eh? XD

  • 4 Posted by rogueist on Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:20AM EDT Report Abuse

    You forgot the most important tip - dont stand over the fireworks expecting to catch a firecracker (or M80) exploding on the ground, or a bottle rocket or roman candle as they launch.

  • 5 Posted by gullwingdoors on Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:13AM EDT Report Abuse

    Good article. I think I'll try some of this stuff with my A590IS. Another tip for those whose camera does not have those settings, if it is a Cannon, try the CHDK firmware. http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK It adds a ton of extra features including the ones mentioned in this article (rapid fire, long exposures, etc).

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.