Wed Oct 8, 2008 1:32PM EDT
See Comments (8)
Bowing to pressure from flight attendants and, reportedly, customers, American Airlines has said it will soon be blocking access to pornographic websites on its new Aircell in-flight Internet access service. Delta announced a similar plan earlier this month.
American says it will work with the provider to set up the filter. No timeline for implimenting the filtering technology has been announced. One has to imagine it won't take long.
Naturally, privacy and civil rights advocates are already criticizing the move. Filters always tend to cast a very wide net, taking with them plenty of non-pornographic content while missing sites that many will find offensive. It's the gray areas -- YouTube, personal blogs, medical information sites -- where things get really tricky. And of course, there's invariably the question of whether filtering will extend to violence, "hate speech," and other frequently-censored content.
Well, if nothing else, American has probably inadvertantly launched a new diversion for bored fliers traveling across the country: "Beat the Filter," where buddies try to see who can slip some adult content past the censor first. Loser buys the next round of drinks!
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
If the airlines aren't making you pay for the internet service they should be able to filter it however they please. But if I am paying for it then I should be able to view, surf whatever websites I please. Now if I have some young kids sitting around me that shouldn't be viewing this kind of stuff then its should fall back on whats right and whats wrong to do. In this day and age accountability for your actions is pretty high and I would not like to be on the receiving end of the consequences if I was to get arrested for someones kid seeing porn on my computer while in flight. Pervs in jail aren't treated very nice so I think these kind of filters might be the best thing out there if you just can't seem to keep from looking at this kind of thing for a few hours.
1. There is not right of privacy in a public place 2. You don't have many rights in someones place of business. They can set rules for your behavior. I don't understand why people have such a problem with this. I bet these privacy nuts would be fired for looking at porn in their own offices (unless they personally own the business and then its their choice).
who would dare do such a thing on a plane anyways? God, I can actually imagine some...
It's kind of interesting that this only comes up when they begin offering browsing service in the air. You never (or at least I never have) heard a similar controversy that people were watching porn DVDs on their portable DVD players on flights, or watching saved movies on their laptops, etc.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by david_lmt on Wed Oct 8, 2008 2:04PM EDT Report Abuse
First, I wouldn't even dare to look at porn in public in the first place. Second, are there that many people out there watching porn on flights that they have to enforce this? Why don't they just give people watching it in the first place warnings instead of blocking websites?