Thu Oct 9, 2008 1:38PM EDT
See Comments (7)
50GB ain't enough for you? Good news. Sanyo says it's created a more powerful version of the laser diode used in Blu-ray hardware that will effectively double the capacity of Blu-ray discs while also speeding them up.
Current Blu-ray tech is limited to two disc layers of 25GB each. Sanyo's new diode has twice the power of existing diodes, which would up the layer capacity to four while also letting discs spin faster, at speeds up to 12x (vs. today's typical 6x). The upshot is that 100GB could, theoretically, be burned to a disc in just 10 minutes.
Unfortunately, the technology is still in the lab and, considering the relatively slow uptake of Blu-ray technology, there's no mad rush to push either capacity and speed up. (Instead, vendors seem focused -- wisely -- on getting prices to come down.) Macworld is reporting that the tech is at least a year or two away from implementation in the field, and there's no telling what it might do to prices.
Question for readers who still haven't bought into BD: Does double capacity sway you? Would faster speeds make you consider Blu-ray as a backup solution on your computer? And what price are you prepared to pay in order to get either a high-capacity set-top player or writeable BD burner for your PC?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
When it comes to data backup, your options are - extra hard drive, tape, or disks. External drives are just as prone to mechanical failure, tape drives are too expensive. Many people use disks... and don't backup so often, because the process is such a pain. 100GB per disk should ease that pain. The question then becomes - how long does a DVD last? Is it susceptible to "DVD rot"? UV? Scratching? Will a disk created today still be readable in 50 years - assuming there's still a compatible reader around ?
I was thinking the same alan_r_cam. Since the data is so much smaller and being burned to more and more layers, I'm betting the data is actually more prone to data corruption from those problems. Not a viable option, in my opinion, if the data isn't good for at least 10 years, which many DVDs burned at home seem to fail before then.
I kind of find the double capacity attractive. It's just that I prefer lower prices first.
When it's cheaper than a hard drive that is when it is going to catch on
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by somebodys_here on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:32PM EDT Report Abuse
An internal BD burner now is about $235... Not a great deal of cash, but a lot more than most want to pay. I'd go for it if they brought the price of media down a bit- DL DVDs still cost $2 a piece in most places==== How much would a 4L BD-r cost? A rewritable BD-RW? This could be a great idea for those who have PS3s and complain about game speed, otherwise it's just a luxury that isn't really needed (Though it still may be called for in about 3 years).