Thu Oct 16, 2008 11:36AM EDT
See Comments (15)
Despite the public shame of driving around with a cell phone jammed against your face and the growing number of laws against it, people just can't stop dialing and driving, it seems. Could the next step be technology that actually disables your cell phone while you're on the road?
A Canadian outfit called Aegis Mobility proffers this new system, called DriveAssist (not "DriveAssistT," a typo which is widely being re-reported), which stops calls while your car is in motion. It doesn't block calls through any sort of electromagnetic shielding or jamming system, it's actually considerably simpler: When your car is moving, the system simply tells your wireless carrier to hold incoming calls and texts and blocks outgoing messages as well. When you stop, the calls come through normally. The advantage to such a system vs. a crude jammer is that your caller receives a notice that you're on the road and unable to receive calls, rather than just going to voice mail automatically. Reportedly they can also bypass the restriction by pressing a button to go into "emergency mode" (which I'm sure would never, ever, be abused). The software will work with Windows Mobile and Symbian phones, at least to start.
In the wake of news that cell phones cause seven percent of crashes or near-crashes, and the devastating train accident last month that killed 25 people due to the driver's text messaging, interest in technologies that can prevent people from using gadgets while behind the wheel is at a fever pitch. But as CNN notes, no matter how risky we all know it is it's a difficult habit to break: Even David Teater, the father of a child who was killed in a car accident by a driver on his cell phone, says he can't bring himself not to answer when the phone rings. DriveAssist is his innovation.
I'm torn on the technology: I worry that important or emergency calls could be missed even with the "bypass" feature, but I tend to agree that the benefits of avoiding accidents outweigh the inconvenience and risk of missed calls. One idea, though, really sells it for me: At least one insurance company says it will offer discounts of up to 10 percent for customers who use the program. Save money and maybe save lies, too? I'm sold.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Hey that is what we need, is a way to stop people from driving and talking or texting, if they want to talk or text let them pull over and do it.
Of course we need a program to use with the phone. Didn't you know it's asking to much for people to be responsible and use common sense. God help us...we sure can't do it on our own!
What a shame we are not smart enough to know when to answer the phone or when and where to ride our bikes.Think people think, or lose more freedom.
Why on earth would anybody pay for this technology? I have the same thing in my car, it's called DON'T CALL OR ANSWER THE PHONE WHILE YOUR DRIVING. Stay off the friggin cellphone, I guarantee that you are not that important that you can't miss a phone call or two while your driving.
What about the passenger in the car? As part of a mobile crisis team, we rely on receiving pages, text messages, etc. We are also required to "10-4" that we got the call to go out. We receive these texts 24/7. Not having cell service, at least for the passenger, would cripple our response. I get it, for the driver, but this seriously infringes on the rights of the passenger.
I think the hand's free system would be the best...That way if an emergency call comes in, it could be answered and the driver would not be distracted by trying to hold a cell phone to his ear...Cell phones not only cause deaths, they are annoying as well...Have you ever tried to get your grocery shopping done while waiting for someone on a cell phone to get out of your way???
This is a wonderful idea. We all love our cell phones, but saving lives and preventing accidents is alot more important. Saving on the cost of auto insurance is a plus as well. Thumbs up!
This idea sounds awesome, it can prevent lots of accidents and save life, but what if it's an emergency phone call that a family member is trying to reach out? What if it's a life and death situation and someone needs you? Who would be responsible for such occurrence?
So if you are just a passenger in a car you are unable to use your cell phone as well. The phone doesnt know if you are the one driving the car or not.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by officerclicheapd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:43PM EDT Report Abuse
rogueist, If you had read the article you would have realized it states "Reportedly they can also bypass the restriction by pressing a button to go into "emergency mode" (which I'm sure would never, ever, be abused)" Before complaining read the article.