Another report frets that MP3 players are deafening listeners

Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:08PM EDT

See Comments (26)

Every couple of months researchers sound the alarm that listening to your MP3 player with headphones at high volumes is going to strike you stone cold deaf. The problem is serious enough that Apple even added volume-limiting technology to its iPod line in 2006, so nervous parents can keep the maximum volume their kids can experience to a less dangerous level.

Now a new study appears to offer more cause for concern than ever, saying that listening to an MP3 player at high volume for only five hours a week -- or an hour each workday -- can do permanent damage to your hearing.

The study comes from Europe's Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, which estimates that up to 10 million European of MP3 player listeners are at risk of permanent hearing loss due to high listening levels. As portable music players continue to be popular and inexpensive gift items, this is a risk that is only going to increase over the next few years. In fact, the risks are likely to increase as audio quality from mobile music players keeps getting better, since better audio may encourage people to listen longer.

The (arguably) good news: While the damage is cumulative and gets worse over time, it doesn't reach critical levels until you've kept up the five-hours-a-week listening for a full five years.

In Europe, music players are currently limited legally to a maximum volume of 100 decibels, but the study notes that 89 decibels is the cutoff point above which damage could occur. To my knowledge, there are no similar rules in place in the U.S. EU activists are now working to lower that maximum.

Comments on Another report frets that MP3 players are deafening listeners

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by nikodemus2008 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    Funny..i wonder what Corp paid for this 'research'..considering anything w/ headphones or earplugs that has the capability to play anything loud would do the same thing, not just MP3s. Heck for that matter..don't live in any major city near a main troad either..honks,police/fire/rescue vehicles might hurt your ears too if 5 hrs a week is all it takes and they alot louder then 100 db.

  • 7 Posted by chevyx68 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    This 'New' study makes me laugh a little. It kind of sounds exactly like the study that was done in the early 1980s with the Sony Walkman. Newsflash... All persistant loud noise damages hearing.

  • 9 Posted by sporty982000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well i recall the walkman, back then a cassetter player walkman, then to cd walkman, and now mp3 & mp4 players. It is certainly true, my hearing is bad, I listened too loud for along time. I think a adult limit of how loud it can be is the way to go.

  • 10 Posted by nurmox on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    i've been listening to my mp3 since i was 12. now im 23..more than 10years u see..and i like to hear it to the max volume! but im still ok..thank god..but i dun think it is a good habit. so, let urself decide what is the best for u. there is no need to limit ur life!

  • 11 Posted by seb_fisher on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    "In fact, the risks are likely to increase as audio quality from mobile music players keeps getting better, since better audio may encourage people to listen longer." What a ridiculous thing to say, lower quality music has much more compression which is more likely to cause deafness. These guys need to get their facts straight before writing some balony about good quality music more likely to cause deafness.

  • 12 Posted by soycap on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm 36, and I can tell you that listening to anything too loud will do damage over time. I have been going to hardcore shows since I was 16 and I didn't start wearing ear plugs until I was 25 or 26, because I didn't start to notice hearing loss until then. I know I wouldn't have (and didn't) listened to anyone who told me to turn it down when I was a kid, but I can assure you from experience that loud is bad.

  • 13 Posted by bill_grabbe on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is an unintended consequence of universal healthcare. When government chokes on the expense, they will cut costs by eliminating or taxing everything we do that is remotely dangerous or unhealthy. Hello, more sin taxes (alcohol, tobacco, etc.). Goodbye guns, motorcycles, fast food, contact sports, loud music, parachuting, private aviation and anything else that could hurt us or make us sick. I wouldn't be surprised if suntanning gets rationed because of skin cancer risks. Laugh now - it won't be funny when it happens.

  • 14 Posted by annejmacaco on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm 23 years old and I have hearing loss. I've been listening to walkmans since I was 8, then cd players now mp3 players. I went to a doctor and I have hearing loss in both ears and they said it was probably because of the headphones (the kind you put in your ear, not over) are more damaging. A sign of hearing loss is a high pitch ringing in your hears, either it comes and goes or it's always there. listening to music loudly isn't worth it, I hate having hearing loss and I never understand what people are trying to tell me. don't think your immune to hearing loss because it just hasn't happened yet, it happens slowly.

  • 15 Posted by moocher83 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    The government regulates all kinds of things that could potential cause you harm, from the amount of lead in drinking water to letting you know that inhaling carcinogens may cause cancer. That's part of the government's job. If listening to headphones causes permanent hearing damage, I think every consumer purchasing headphones has a right to at least know about the potential risks.

  • 16 Posted by ptp_casper on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    i can't even get my cell phone mp3 player volume low enough. the lowest setting before it goes mute is too loud for me unless i'm outside.

  • 17 Posted by jasonmcintosh on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hearing damage is cumulative and is irreversible. I don’t believe in mandating hearing protection/limits (or seatbelts) for adults, but kids are another matter. Hearing damage is mostly a quality of life matter. I’m 44 and can’t hear some of the birds that my kids are talking about when we take a walk in the woods. I can never get that hearing back, but I sure wish I would have limited my sound exposure, but at least I can protect what I have left. A device to help consumers make better informed decisions about how loud the music is they’re listening to is a great idea.

  • 18 Posted by jesa_hotchic on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    got ni iPod...heheh,,,better give me one so that i can test!

  • 19 Posted by skiskout on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    The only problem is that if the government doesn't set limits on harmful products taxpayers like me will have to fit your bill through health care, paying for your stupid hearing aids!

  • 20 Posted by jdmonte_119 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    i am not an expert but it seems the our ear has like a "counter action" towards high decibel sounds. and we tend to notice that after hearing a high pitch sound its followed by the pinging of the ear(i believe is the "counter-action")..the reason we are 'deaf-like" after listening a loud music(including one on the headphones), is , i believe because of the"counter-action"..but then again,am not an expert.

  • 21 Posted by shiftycsce on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    My new hearing aids cost $2,000 each. Big coost compared to other health costs

  • 22 Posted by boodrowbayou on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am 54 and wear hearing aids. I got them about 2 years ago. The doctor said it was from listening to music really loud when I was a kid. So I guess it has effects even years later. I didn't get an ipod until I was already deaf so I can't blame it. But I can enjoy my music so much better with the ipod than listening with hearing aids. I have no high frequency hearing much but with the ipod I can hear it well.

  • 23 Posted by superfresh65 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    i have noise cancelling headphones so i can always put the volume on the lowest setting and still be able to hear music really good. (i listen to music for 5+ hours a day}

  • 24 Posted by wawafet on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well, one can never really predict if they're gonna be sick or not, same as you can never tell if you're gonna be deaf just by listening to loud music. But since these studies are coming out, why not take precautions? For sure this group of people wouldn't release these findings if they don't have a basis. Right? I think its still better to be safe than sorry.

  • 25 Posted by cstrdl on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    i think lawmakers should spend their time wisely. regulate other things better rather than limiting the volume of ipod. it such a petty matter.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.