Hands-on review: Sony Xperia X1

Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:28PM EST

See Comments (83)

It's not an iPhone, and for many that's half the appeal: Sony's $800 (unlocked) Xperia X1 is the most expensive mainstream cell phone on the market, but it's one of the sexiest handsets around that doesn't start with an "i" and end in "phone."

The main X1 interface is unlike any other handset you've tried, and you'll notice the difference immediately as you punch into the XPanel home screen, a custom dashboard that lets you quickly -- and stylishly -- jump from one application to another, usually with just a single touch. You get nine panes to work with. By default they include an FM radio, calendar, clock, photo viewer, and the Opera web browser (a much appreciated improvement over the IE browser included with Windows Mobile, atop which all of this is built). Some Xperia-specific apps, including a bizarre system that uses colored fish as alerts, are also on tap to baffle you for months. Dig into the settings and you can mix and match the apps you want to appear and download new apps from Sony's website.

The phone is a horizontal slider, and when closed the front of the phone features a three-inch touchscreen (with a whopping 800 x 480 pixel resolution) with a small collection of buttons beneath it. Of special note is the center action button, which also works as a tiny touchpad in many applications while you drag your fingertip around on it.

Flip the phone on its side and slide the screen up and you get a full QWERTY keyboard, a real blessing for those of us cursed with the inability to type on touchscreens. The buttons on the keyboard are a bit too flush for my taste -- typing with two thumbs didn't work well for me -- but it beats tapping on the screen with a stylus. The design is very sturdy (and not too heavy at 5.6 ounces), and the phone, on the whole, feels like it will be able to handle multiple drops to the floor.

Other features include a nice 3.2 megapixel camera (though it's dog slow to focus) and a microSD slot (no Memory Stick for this bad boy), which is located under the battery panel cover. The phone supports 3G, but only if you use an AT&T SIM card, but it also has Wi-Fi built in to pick up the slack no matter what network you're on. GPS (and Google Maps) are also in the box. I haven't done a full battery drain test on the handset, but Sony rates it for six hours. Judging by experience and the size of the battery, that seems like a fair guess.

In addition to notes above, I have a few smallish complaints with the phone. The biggest problem is that Windows Mobile underlies the innovative XPanel, and I found I had to scurry back into WM more often than I'd like in order to get certain things done. I wish Sony would have enhanced the OS it uses on its Walkman handsets instead of building on Windows... though I do understand the benefits that Windows Mobile gets you, including email and application viewers. But still, do we really need both Opera and IE on one handset?

The X1 also has some general performance problems: Apps load so slowly that I often found myself clicking a button twice, which would then inadvertently undo what I was trying to do while I waited for the phone to catch up. Everything is kind of pokey, even the web browser. Whether it's a slow CPU or all those layers of OS that slows the Xperia down I don't know, but it's bothersome to the point of frustration.

Lastly there's that little matter of price tag. Who will pay $800 for a cell phone? No matter how excited I am about the mini-touchpad and the XPanel system, I can't justify spending nearly a grand on this handset. Subsidize it to $200 with a contract and I'm on board.

Comments on Hands-on review: Sony Xperia X1

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by ahhyo2006 on Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:27PM EST Report Abuse

    This is not the most expensive cell phone in its class out their, check out Motorola Aura, it's $1,299.99USD and it doesn't even have a keyboard.

  • 7 Posted by zero_xavier_2007 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 11:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    If you have $800.00 to waste on a cell phone, you either have too much money or too little of brains.

  • 8 Posted by nirpal@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have seen this phone and it does NOT compare to the iPhone..this writer is a Windows person and hates APPlE..don't listen to him..Sony losts it's appeal a decade ago...this guy needs to move on...it's no longer 1998 but 2008..Sony is no longer king of anything..look at the PSP and the PS3...not to mention their very late arrival to the flat screen tv market, everyone was selling flat screens and Sony was selling flat tube TVs...This phone is a HUGE rip off worth $199...I have seen it trust me...

  • 9 Posted by saikasha712 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Phones...are not sexy. They are devices used to keep in touch with others, and are one of the dirtiest accessories you could possibly have on you at any time. They truly cannot be sexy, the only way people have begun to consider them this way is due to heavy media advertising that just really, really needs you to buy this new phone or else the economy apparently will die.

  • 10 Posted by valerwheexd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    I rather have the SamSung Haptic or the LG Viewty.

  • 11 Posted by samus5164 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    Lol, $800 for a nice looking phone. It moves slowly and the camera takes forever to focus, so there isn't much good in this phone. Might as well get two iPhones for that price.

  • 13 Posted by greeneyes4l on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'll buy it when I get my DVM...and pay off my 100,000+ loan...I guess I'll just stick with my blackberry :)

  • 14 Posted by aznjasonskillz on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    subsidize this to $200? youre dreaming! yes it is a bit pricey but well worth it. this is a serious phone for the real tech geeks. ask yourself this: have any of the top of the line SE phones been cheap? Nothing beats the Sony Style.

  • 15 Posted by iseekoreangirls on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    Didn't read the article, just saw the picture. ..Looks bulky. Charging an outrageous amount worked with the first iPhone because people were willing to pay anything for the cool technology. Now that all these new phones use touch, along with iPhones selling cheaper, manufacturers will have to lower the price, perhaps under $200 in order to compete. Design & simplicity is what made iPhone so successful. The "iphone killer" should have a combination of super thin frame + simple interface. (priced less than $800, for sure) Seems right now, the only true contender would be a super-thin Blackberry. ..Just not sure how user-friendly Blackberries are, and how well they handle mp3's/movies.

  • 16 Posted by visioneerdesigns on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    THINK OUTSIDE of The "BOX" people. New Age phone here. This phone as a better key pad than the iphony "lol" Anywayz this phone doe it all just a minature laptop. Great Apps for a phone. Spend the money and enjoy. Great for past-time fun.

  • 17 Posted by harrisbrittany@ymail.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    The way this is going, cell phones will soon be in the thousands, its almost like buying a darn car.

  • 18 Posted by tweetanne on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think $300 is too much money for a phone. $800 I can pay part of my tuition with that. And an education never goes out of style and it can never be taken away from you.

  • 19 Posted by jaimevga on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well I had it today in my hands and WOW, it is amazing.. Trust me no competition. I have a blackberry Storm, Blackberry Bold and an iphone 16G. This is 100 times better than the 3 combined. Its worth the money!

  • 20 Posted by jamiesteph4026 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    it looks nice people,but come on the economy people trying to hold on to their houses and your thinking,what they are going to run out and buy this NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 21 Posted by philliphoward13@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have recently purchased the new Samsung I900 Omnia, which also runs on windows mobile and has both Opera 9 & IE, and I LOVE it. The Omnia is also $800, but it is so lovely, 5 megapixel camera, Windows Mobile 6.1, the list goes on. I hope the X1 can compare, but if it has the problems this article says it has I'd go with Samsung, as the Omnia is super fast.

  • 22 Posted by ducky690 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    Um... no. Most expensive mainstream cell phone is the nokia E90, priced (new) around $1400. Its got all the features of the X1, and its almost 3 years old now. The Aura is a luxury phone, like Vertu, Tag, etc.

  • 23 Posted by evilmonkey305 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    This Is a new sleek design it looks great. Thre is a lot of competing against the Iphone. But i know 1 thing Iphone is alot cheaper than this. This is 800$ also probably 60$ a month. This is why Iphone always Wins because it's Cheaper!!!!!!

  • 24 Posted by landroversd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    T-Mobile has the G!, which is an awesome phone. Easy to use, attractively styled, great reception and 3G speed. This Sony reminds me of a more expensive version.

  • 25 Posted by kmeyer444 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    no thanks rather buy a laptop,ps3or a flat screen tv for that price.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.