Mon Dec 1, 2008 12:07PM EST
See Comments (70)
You spent hundreds or thousands on a fancy new HDTV -- so you ought to be able to tell when you're watching a high-definition television program vs. one of those moldy old standard-def shows, right?
Alas, that's not quite the case. A full 18 percent of HDTV owners can't tell the difference between SD and HD, according to a survey from Leichtman Research Group, which polled over 1,300 U.S. households about what they were watching.
The confusion largely seems to lie with the issue that many HDTV buyers don't understand that their existing cable TV feeds come at standard-definition resolution and that a service upgrade has to be purchased in order to get high-def programming. To this day numerous consumers just don't get it that a high-def cable signal isn't included with the TV set itself, and that additional hardware is required in order to decode an HD signal. It also doesn't help matters that many cable and satellite providers offer low-grade transmissions that stretch the definition of HD, so compressed that you can't really be blamed for not being able to tell the difference vs. SD, even if you are watching the higher-end service.
This all bodes poorly for the rest of the high-def video world. If consumers can't tell the difference between a crummy, roughly VHS-quality broadcast and high-definition, what hope do they have when comparing, say, DVD vs. Blu-ray, which are closer in quality level?
Do you have HDTV programming for your HDTV? Are you sure?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
"No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people."
I’m glad I read up on HD TV and did some research before laying down the coin on a High Def set. I have a hard time understanding how such a large purchase wouldn’t be credited a little research to gain some understanding. No, I don’t have an HD subscription for my HD TV. I only use it for Blu-Ray and HD Gaming on my PS3. In fact, I still have my Tube TV plugged in. If we are not watching a DVD/Blu-Ray DVD or Gaming on the PS3, we are watching TV on the tube. At least until the price of a HD subscription comes down and more and more channels offer HD. A lot of the content is still just not broadcast in HD to be worth the money they are asking per month for HD programming.
**READ THIS** A co-worker of mine mentioned you can get free HD channels over the air with a standard attenna. I thought he was BS-ing me, but it's true. Connect a standard indoor attenna to your fancy new HD TV and get the standard: ABC, NBC, FOX, CBS, and PBS (maybe WB) for free in HD! Tell everyone you know. I pay $36 to Time Warner a month for my other tube TV cable and wireless Internet (basic service)
I think you are being a little over dramatic. It's 18%. 18% of 1300 households polled. "If consumers can't tell the difference between a crummy, roughly VHS-quality broadcast and high-definition" 82% CAN tell the difference. 18% isn't very high for it to be declared that consumers can't tell the difference. Escpecially with a sample size of only 1300 households.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by maclingman on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:02PM EDT Report Abuse
We have crummy time warner HD service right now in the college apt (get what you pay for "free HD"), but I can't wait to get direct TV's HD. My parents on the other hand who got their HD tv a couple of years ago have yet to upgrade to an HD service or even purchase a dvd upverter and I doubt they ever will see the value in doing so