Mon Dec 1, 2008 12:07PM EST
See Comments (70)
You spent hundreds or thousands on a fancy new HDTV -- so you ought to be able to tell when you're watching a high-definition television program vs. one of those moldy old standard-def shows, right?
Alas, that's not quite the case. A full 18 percent of HDTV owners can't tell the difference between SD and HD, according to a survey from Leichtman Research Group, which polled over 1,300 U.S. households about what they were watching.
The confusion largely seems to lie with the issue that many HDTV buyers don't understand that their existing cable TV feeds come at standard-definition resolution and that a service upgrade has to be purchased in order to get high-def programming. To this day numerous consumers just don't get it that a high-def cable signal isn't included with the TV set itself, and that additional hardware is required in order to decode an HD signal. It also doesn't help matters that many cable and satellite providers offer low-grade transmissions that stretch the definition of HD, so compressed that you can't really be blamed for not being able to tell the difference vs. SD, even if you are watching the higher-end service.
This all bodes poorly for the rest of the high-def video world. If consumers can't tell the difference between a crummy, roughly VHS-quality broadcast and high-definition, what hope do they have when comparing, say, DVD vs. Blu-ray, which are closer in quality level?
Do you have HDTV programming for your HDTV? Are you sure?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I have a 50'' Plasma and I dropped the HD from directv. the $10 is not worth it. just use a s-cable and it looks just the same. a low priced upgrading dvd player with a cheap HDMI cable from amazon ($2.00) looks great too. why pay $250 for a blueray when you can do get the same pic quality for alot less?
I recently purchased a big screen 1080p TV hoping to get in on the HDTV craze. I was very disappointed with the results. I subscribe to a cable company with a bundle of internet, cable and phone. I should have done my research more on the subject. However, I recently found out that my cable company puts out DTV for free. I was able to scan for channels and discovered that I have more than 70 DTV channels available but hidden. I can access mine by inputting the DTV channels i.e. DTV channel 90-7. I am much happier now not only because the picture quality is 100% better but also the audio is much clearer.
Those of you who fail to see the difference are apparently having issues with your input somewhere. And the idea that Directv's $10 upgrade price is too much?? You've got to be kidding people. If you truly cannot see the difference, you should not be driving, because your poor vision is going to get you killed on the road.
cherrypieater is echoing the sentiments of so many people... the picture is pixelated... I hated that fact on my DLP with my old DVD player.. Comcast must have upgraded their service, since I'm not seeing it anymore... but truth be told.. most people are buying too big a television, for how close they sit. get a smaller TV, or sit further away, and you wont see the pixels.
I remember reading somewhere a while ago that 60% of PS3 owners have their system hooked up to an HDTV using composite (red white yellow) cables, which are capable of showing only a 480i image. This same percentage is not even aware that the PS3 has a built in Blu-Ray player.
I don't want to go on a rant about my issues with DirecTV, but trust me when I say that I have had numerous techs out here, and a number of adjustments, equipment swaps, etc. I think my HR20 receiver was notorious for issues. Anyway, I think the morale of my story is that there is a small percentage of us suffering from simple hardware/technology woes. But I definitely could tell the difference in HD and actually loved it when it was reliable. I miss it, but I'm just too darn stubborn and ticked off to renew the service.
My setup: Sony 46" 1080P 120HZ Z series LCD, 2 x Monster 1000 HDMI, Cox HD Cable, SONY PS3-Bluray. Result = Blu Ray pix is amazing, life like, breathtaking Picture, 3-D images. Cable is broadcasting 1080i/720P (Except for Discovery HD Theater-1080P)and with 120H Zlooks lifelike for sporting events-NFL/NBA. So much for going to live sporting events anymore.
Jeepmonster, your S cable has an even inferior connection to even HD Component cables. Your blind if you think your S Video connection looks the same a BluRay! That is the stupidiest coment I have read on here. Either that or TV is garbage and cant suport HD signals.
Gnomishmachinegun, I remember reading somewhere that over half of 1st and 2nd generation XBox 360 got the Ring of Death! PS3 won the HD wars. Go back to asking your parents for $8 a month for your xbox live subscription.
OTA - ( Over the Air) HD broadcast are - 1) FREE 2) BETTER - than HD Satellite, HD cable. I will use a provider to receive a wider range of material, but the OTA signals are incredible when watching newly produced shows. I have heard that OTA broadcast were primarily going to be 720 but in the Nashville market i have at least two major players pushing 1080i OTA. The pictures AND sound are stunning. search for "Homemade HD Antenna" and save even more! By the way an HD antenna is the same antenna as regular ol' television antenna's since we are using the same overall frequency band's.
ok no offense to those of you out there but think about this: Your sight and hearing start to go downhill in your mid to late 20's. Who buys/can afford these pricey tv's? Most people that purchase them are people who have careers with their feet financially on the ground (30-45). Get where I'm going? Of course you cannot tell the difference you have half the sight you once had! I'm 21 and I can easily say that watching blurays and playing Gears of War 2 on my 40" samsung is definitely not the same as my old Magnavox tv (which now resides in my garage).
If you want HD for gaming only, I suggest a CPU Monitor. 1080i is actually a low resolution to most newer screens. So the screen can take the gaming setting well. Also these new screens have a gaming color setting to them that will help prevent burnout. We get a few channels that get really good HD. THe discovery channel in HD looks the best by far.
please to explain. I upgraded from standard tv tube to a 55 in. HD television with built in tuner. I get 1080 signal. 2 weeks later my cable carrier gave me a hard time.
If HDTV is supposed to be the new STANDARD for TV transmission, how can cable companies demand a surcharge to provide HDTV service? Shouldn't that be illegal (if not now, then certainly after Feb. 2009)?
A sample size of 1300, if truly random, is far more than needed for the results to be statistically significant at a high confidence level.
I notice this at home with my wife and step daughter. They constantly are watching standard definition programming when it is offered in HD. For me it is quite apparent, when I enter the room and look at the screen,but for them it is not. I've had both Cablevision and FIOS and there was not any perceptable difference in picture quality. The sound on FIOS is better quality and it doe not pixelate as often.
Digital TV is the new broadcast standard, but there is no requirement for all digital to be HD. SD can and will broadcasr in digital form.
TWC of NE Ohio in Akron has a brilliant picture with the component cables they provide. Even the cable connected to the TV without the DVR give a very nice picture on HD. I fail to understand all the duress. It is simple, HDTV is only broadcast in 720p and the TV upverts it to better resolution. Analog programming doesn't look very nice, sort of like a very worn video cassette recording. Still I purchased a 1080p television. Maybe the complainers don't realize that HDTV channels are a different channel number, ie, channel 3 would be 3.1 for HD. I suspect that the complainers still have 12:00 flashing on their VCRs!
Actually, if you buy an HDTV from Vizio, you get an HDMI cable in the box with it.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
46 Posted by davidwrisley on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:38PM EDT Report Abuse
Sounds like these are the people that also believe in U.F.O.'s. Or the 40% that have an IQ under 100. HD feed + HD channel + HD equipment = unmistakable difference.