Netbooks just a flash in the pan?

Tue Dec 2, 2008 2:36PM EST

See Comments (22)

If it seems that every computer company in the world (except Apple, of course) has an inexpensive netbook on the market, that's because they do. These cheap, low-power laptops have been all the rage for a year and counting.

Now Intel, whose Atom chip powers the bulk of today's netbooks, is rethinking the category. While originally envisioned as way to extend technology to emerging markets, children, and other price-sensitive environments, actual sales of the devices show a somewhat different picture. Most netbooks aren't being sold to these users at all, but rather to upscale customers in North America and Europe, where they're being used as a "grab and go" laptop by users who already have a primary use machine.

As such, Intel is calling the netbook "mostly incremental" to their market, implying that sales will not be sustainable since they are coming from existing buyers and not new overseas markets, as had been hoped.

Overall the company seems largely bearish on the device that has, in many minds, saved the computing category from being devastated by the economic recession, complaining (as many have) that their low power and small size makes them bearable for an hour at a time, and that's about it. AMD isn't making a netbook-focused chip, either, instead choosing to focus on thin and light laptops -- which command far higher prices. The company is on record as saying that it is completely "ignoring the netbook phenomenon."

For now, at least, netbooks are still selling incredibly strongly. Yesterday's Cyber Monday tally showed netbooks dominating the tech category at Amazon.com, with the top six computer products sold being mini-notebooks. How long can these pint-sized 'puters keep this up? And what will happen if they suddenly stop their mad domination of the market?

Comments on Netbooks just a flash in the pan?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by pcofmind1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    I guess I "kind of" understand the netbook thing, but I'd think that one would be better served by simply carrying around a couple more pounds and a bit bulkier to have a fully-loaded, screaming fast lappy that would run circles around these netbooks -- See Apple Macbook Air (paper thin, light as a feather) and the HP line of TX mobile touch-screen tablet PCs (12.1" and a 180-degree adjustable screen -- I want one!). Impressive and light & portable. If, however, you just must downsize further, drop down to an iPhone or Crackberry. I see the netbook as the modern-day equivalent of glorified Smith-Corona typewriter. Sufficient for limited purposes.

  • 2 Posted by dakotazgirl101 on Tue Dec 2, 2008 8:13PM EST Report Abuse

    i heard that they suck. which they probably do. btw pcofmind, HPs suck. just a little information.

  • 3 Posted by shutrbug@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    I bought an Acer Aspire One a month or so ago. It's far superior to the Nokia 770 that I have, which is really only useful for truly rudimentary tasks. The Acer replaced my aging Toshiba. Granted, I still have a C2D-powered desktop for my heavyweight computing, but the netbook is a perfect adjunct to a more powerful and more costly machine (e.g., MBA). If Intel and AMD don't want to serve this market, they're leaving themselves wide open to be disrupted from below by a company like Via if they can get their price/performance in balance with the demonstrated minimum requirements of the Atom.

  • 4 Posted by blourenoster on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    Netbooks are too expensive for the emerging African markets and 3rd world countries... $500 just wont cut it, anything above $200 will be hard to sell in the 3rd world (except for a very few people and organizations who also want it for a grab and go machine)

  • 5 Posted by starcatcher_wh on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    dakotazgirl101, how is that 'information?' That's just your uninformed opinion, judging by your 'they probably do' comment. If you're going to criticize something, you might want to either try it, or get a bit more 'information' than 'i [sic] heard they suck'.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.