Mon Dec 15, 2008 3:42PM EST
See Comments (99)
Lists like this are awfully subjective, but always fun to work on. As Christmas approaches, it's time to reminisce about the products that really floated my boat in 2008... and a few of the ones that made me run away screaming.
Without further ado, here are my -- completely personal -- picks for some of the best products to come from the world of technology from 2008.
The Best
Gateway MC7803u laptop - It has modest specs and average-to-good performance, but $1,000 flat gets you a gorgeous, 16-inch screen and a distinctive, classy chassis, complete with leather trim. It's altogether an excellent value and has all the features that virtually every user needs in a portable.
Rock Band 2 - Arguably the best game of the year -- I find it humbling that I listen to more music while playing Rock Band than I do on my iPod. The ongoing addition of new -- and good -- music to the game makes it an ongoing favorite at Null HQ.
Lenovo IdeaPad S10 - If you must buy a netbook, try Lenovo's outstanding mini, which is exceptionally powerful for its feature set and size and priced to move.
Intel Core i7 CPU - This new CPU is the fastest and most capable microchip on the block, hands down, and it won't melt your computer along the way. Can't wait for the mobile version to arrive in 2009.
Hulu - This web TV service really came into its own in 2008 after a slow and rocky start. YouTube gets all the press (and about 100 times the traffic), but Hulu has the full-length, high-quality commercial shows and snippets that people actually want to watch. And the player is snappier in response than anything else on the market.
Fabrik [re]drive - Environmentalism in the tech world doesn't have to mean just a good take-back program. The [re]drive is made of bamboo and recyclable aluminum, making it not just more eco-conscious than any other hard drive on the market, but better looking too.
Sony Xperia X1 - If it weren't for the $800 price tag, you'd see X1 handsets in the hands of all the digerati instead of the iPhone. (Yeah, I like the iPhone 3G, too, but the atrocious battery life is cause enough to keep it off this year's "best" list.)
Herman-Miller Embody - Can a man fall in love with a chair? Yes, yes he can.
The Worst
Blu-ray - I'm happy to see that Blu-ray players have come down in price... but the media has not, and there's no way I'm paying $25 to watch Step Brothers. Plus the technology is still, bafflingly, dog-slow to respond. There's a very loud and vocal minority that insists that Blu-ray will be a huge success. The market would seem to indicate otherwise. (And no, I am not a disgruntled HD DVD player owner; never owned one.)
Mint.com - Lots of writers hail Mint.com's finance tracking system as the best thing since Coca-Cola Classic, but after weeks with the service I've never gotten it to work right. It still can't grab all my account information from one of the biggest banks in the world... and every month I am (wrongly) chastised for spending over $5,000 on groceries, the category into which all my spending is invariably dumped.
DRM in All Its Forms - Why does DRM still exist? It's so aggravating and generates so many lawsuits that promising products like RealDVD get sued off the planet within days of launching. Three months after launch, RealDVD is still "temporarily" off the market as the company deals with a Hollywood lawsuit.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I love it whenever someone blogs, writes or discusses the downside of Blu Ray, advocates rouse up and bring up tired old arguments about HD-DVD inferiority, belittle old plebian DVD and ignore Blu Ray's price gouging. We can't even get good DVD editions of current movies yet and already we're being strong armed into Blu Ray. It's like no one see how ridiculous buying the same movie over and over and over is! Sure, Blu Ray is great quality but that's ALL it has to offer in comparison to standard. As for the BluZealots on the web: If you want your money stolen can't you send me some!
I would gladly pay $25 to see any movie in Blu Ray. You pay half that much to see in in the movie theater, not counting popcorn.
ill have to agree with most of the folks posting comments on this article, it is biased. im not certain as to the ulterior motive of the author but most of what he says in this piece is lopsided at best. he comes very close to lying and misleading people into buying items that are not the best and forgoing those that are worth while and better than the author portrays. as for the Sony Xperia X1, yes it is a very sexy phone just way out of my price range.
Lowest tech mark of the year go to your glasses. They need serious adjustment to be in alignment for the times. Your pick of the laptops are quite possibly, in this techs experience, with years behind my data, the 2 worst. Gateway and Acer (being the marriage from heck are the 2 lowest rungs of the ladder followed by slipshod Lenovo after taking over the fine Thinkpad/centre line. Onkyo Home Theater 7.1 is the hardest to set up initially. I do, however, agree with the blu-ray slowness to load.
The future of movies is on demand. I have a fairly large collection of DVD's, and bought most of them on the cheap. I will not invest in these films on Blue-Ray, when viewing them on DVD is adequate. Besides, most older movies are offered free, on cable demand. How many times are you going to watch the same film over and over (Or actually have the time), for it to be worth the 20-25 bucks a pop for blue ray. And the deluxe versions of new films are 35 bucks! The only person I know who has Blue Ray collection is a single friend, who has money to burn. Pretty much everyone else had DVD.
I don't get why people who like Blu Ray are flipping out on the person that reviewed it. It's one persons opinion and it's not like they are stopping you from buying Blu Ray if that is what you choose to get.
In response to post 21 [roku]: Probably because no one's heard of it. I haven't, at least.
pgman2123 in 1999: "How many times are you going to watch the same film over and over (Or actually have the time), for it to be worth the 20-25 bucks a pop for blue ray. And the deluxe versions of new films are 35 bucks! The only person I know who has DVD collection is a single friend, who has money to burn. Pretty much everyone else had VHS."
No one is forcing anyone to buy a Blu ray - player or DVD - but to label a vastly superior and affortable technology as one of the worst of the year is dumb. Last time I read one of this morons reviews.
@jnbseiden Have you even compared the video quality of HD downloads versus Bluray? With lower resolutions and high compression to get file sizes down on the downloads, most if not all the time Bluray has better video hands down. Not to mention that most people don't have near the bandwidth to download their movies in HD in a reasonable amount of time and don't have a way to watch it on their TV, which is where they want it. Not to mention the people who have old computers with only enough memory to store maybe 1 or 2 HD movies. HD downloads will serve a computer enthusiast niche but it isn't ready for prime time yet.
I must be crazy because I thought Rock Band 2 was the biggest disappointment of the year. The track list was absolutely horrible and the game overall lost the feel of the first. I agree that Blu Ray is pretty expensive. The PS3 is well worth it though.
saab_9_3 seems to have an unnatural love for Blu Ray but worst technology? I hope that's a joke? Slow? Slow is a relative term. What are you comparing it to? Its light speed faster than DVDs. My PS3 handles Blu Rays without a hitch and they are fast as anything. NetFlix service is the best way to get Blu Rays in my opnion. I personally think collecting movies is silly but DVDs still cost $20. why wouldn't you pay $5 more for noticeably better picture? Blu Ray on this list just doesn't make any sense and you do a terrible job explaining why you put it on the list. You might want to try again at explaining why Blu Ray is on this list or take it off.
I have to agree with the blue ray statement. I bought a blue ray player and I honestly dont see what the big deal is... spending 200-300 more to watch a movie was crazy to do. And yes, the movies are more expensive.. it wasnt worth it. I also have to say about the iphone.. I HATED mine at first and was going to take it back... but now its something I use all the time and would gladly buy another one if this one ever stopped working. I can't see NOT having it.
Why's everyone so bent on what was written in this article? Obviously it's one mans opinion; like it, don't like it - no big deal. He even went out of his way to make sure everyone understood (assuming people actually read the first paragraph - bad to assume for sure) that what he wrote was strictly his own opinion. |quote=Christopher Null|"Lists like this are awfully subjective...(snip)...products that really floated my boat in 2008... and a few of the ones that made me run away screaming. ...(snip)...here are my -- completely personal -- picks..."|end quote|
As soon as he said he listens to more music while playing Rock Band 2 rather than his ipod...lost me..
People sure are defensive when it comes to blu ray. It's just a dumb media format. Get over it, children.
Do I really want to pay $29.99 for a blu-ray copy of 'Wall-e'($14.99 dvd) or 'Horton hears a who' for my Kids...No. Am I worried about not being able to hear the nuances between 5.1 and 7.1 surround...No(by the way how many blu-ray discs have 7.1 surround?). Can I play that disc in a portable player...No(can I even buy a portable blu-ray player...No). Am I interested in all the fluff they put on the disc...No. Although I appreciate the video quality of blu-ray, it offers little value to me, considering it costs nearly 100% more.
look people, what this debate comes down to is if you want to own a cadillac than you're going to pay cadillac prices. If you don't want to pay cadillac prices than buy a kia. point is if you want the superior tech than you're going to have to pay for it, otherwise just shut up and enjoy your standard dvd's at a budget price.
About Hulu: yeah, sure it's great... but only if you happen to live in the USA. For everyone else in the entire world it's useless :-( Hulu has to keep working on going global or it will always be far behind Youtube... or even Megavideo.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 Posted by t.agerjr on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:53PM EDT Report Abuse
This article is rather funny. Picking a game like Rock Band 2 as an "arguable" game of the year is a joke (I can name at least 10 that would easily come before and quite honestly there are a few more), as is saying Blu-Ray is one of the worst products. And as for the cost of Blu-Rays you do not need EVERY movie in Blu-Ray. Like all those older movies you don't need. The only thing I'd really suggest for Blu-Ray are the high special effect movies. And $25 isn't even really breaking the bank to own a movie, remember DVDs used to be more expensive too.