AMD aims to build middle ground between netbook and laptop

Tue Jan 6, 2009 12:01AM EST

See Comments (13)

Disappointed with the tiny keyboard and minimal power of netbooks... but still don't want to shell out the big bucks for a full-fledged laptop?

AMD has a new(ish) idea for you, which they call the "ultrathin notebook."

The idea is to create a laptop in a form factor that's larger than the netbook/mini-notebook, with an 11- to 13-inch screen, but with only a moderately higher price. In AMD's view, ultrathins would cost between $499 and $1,499, considerably less than the stratospherically priced ultraportables of today that run about the same size. At the same time, the larger size would allow for higher-end components and, more importantly, a full-sized keyboard for your typing pleasure.

While today's netbooks are useless for much beyond web browsing and the occasional email, ultrathins could work as general computing devices and even casual gaming. And yet they'd still weigh less than four pounds and measure under an inch thick, so they'd be nearly as portable.

What's AMD's contribution to all of this? A new CPU called Athlon Neo coupled with a 3000 series ATI Radeon GPU (or a lower end chip for machines targeting a cheaper price point). AMD's benchmarks (to be taken lightly until independent test results arrive, of course) show a 1.6GHz Neo vastly outperforming the Intel Atom while showing the Core 2 Duo as still being 30 to 50 percent faster at the same clock speed. Of course, the Core 2 Duo costs over twice as much, too, so the trade-off might be a worthwhile one.

HP will be the first vendor with a Neo-based ultrathin machine, the Pavilion dv2 Entertainment Notebook (seen above, full specs and pricing were not immediately available), which should be announced today alongside the Neo news. Hoping to see it in the flesh at CES later this week.

Comments on AMD aims to build middle ground between netbook and laptop

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by roamerw1972 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well, I use my notebook (that has an AMD processor) for my every-day work (my job is not a hacker:-)) I like it and it is pretty reliable so far. I agree that ultra thin laptops/notebooks are really just a waste of money as it really does not matter if a laptop is a pound lighter or heavier when the difference in price is hundreds or even thousands of dollars. I look at portable devices whether they are useful or not. Usability was always more important for me than a status symbol...

  • 7 Posted by tgmgale on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    Personally I think all laptops have bad keyboards, to short battery life and skimpy graphics. Why manufacturers do not try to put a full function keyboard (excluding numeric keypad) in a laptop is crazy. Look how successful the old Tandy 100/200 series was all because of the keyboard.

  • 8 Posted by rockfordgrandma on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    I wouldnt trade my Aspire One for anything. I use it for taking powerpoints to talks, oral histories are recorded onto it and then transcribed, its a perfect sub for lugging my 17in HP Pav everywhere. I surf the net on it as well with no trouble.

  • 9 Posted by damontheogre on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    i recently bought an acer aspire one because i wanted to do research for my college course and i didn't want to carry round a noticably laptop shaped bag. I LOVE IT yes the keyboard is a bit small but you can live with it if, like me you type with two fingers. the only purpose for this new slant of AMD is to create a new niche for the vain posers who want nothing more than the latest gadgets to show off and leave in the cupboard when the next latest turns up

  • 10 Posted by vasplieon on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    Net books do not have the processing capacity that is needed today to effectively defend against viruses/malware and not be noticeably slower. Just try and run full blown Norton on the netbook, god forbid you initiate a system scan because you'll be down for awhile. Alternative, go without, surf the net without this software for very long and you will most likely find Smitfraud.C or Vondo eviscerating your new netbook, effectively reducing it into a 9"x8" coaster (which bodes well for me because I have been fixing many of the little things for customers). I hope that the new AMD offering can deal with this idea because current Intel Atom based netbooks are not up to snuff and probably never will be. If you cannot run antivirus AND antispy/malware programs whatever you purchased is worthless (or will be soon).

  • 11 Posted by pjtrader2001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    While today's netbooks are useless for much beyond web browsing and the occasional email, ultrathins could work as general computing devices and even casual gaming.

  • 12 Posted by pjtrader2001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    "While today's netbooks are useless for much beyond web browsing and the occasional email, ultrathins could work as general computing devices and even casual gaming." Most netbook owners will disagree with this - my HP 2133 works as hard as my Fujitsu T4020. The screen size is the major reason I head for a larger computer. In the end, it's size and weight that matters to most consumers. Frankly, I'm not fond of lugging a 15" or larger notebook around, no matter whether it weighs 3 pounds or 8 lbs.

  • 13 Posted by northgun09 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    AMD for the win! I just wish the would push those 3.0 GHz quad cores out faster!

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.