Desktops are dying, slain by laptops

Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:03PM EST

See Comments (114)

In a recent blog post, I mentioned almost as an aside that "the desktop PC [was] well on its way to the grave," figuring this was common knowledge by now and nothing that would raise eyebrows. But I was surprised how this one little comment generated a ton of mail from curious readers looking for more details on the trend.

I'm happy to oblige.

What we have at work here is a trend that's been in the making for a solid decade. In the PC world, the market share owned by laptops has been rising dramatically and steadily, eating into the share owned by desktops. In the second half of 2008, those trend lines finally crossed, as laptops outsold desktops for the first time ever. In 2009, sales of laptops should comprise 55 percent of the PC market, and now many are beginning to wonder when the first major tech company will get out of the desktop market altogether, where profits are lower and equipment takes up much more space on the production floor.

The reasons for the shift are largely obvious. Earlier in the decade, you could rely on desktops to be more reliable, much easier to upgrade, far more powerful, and much, much cheaper than their laptop counterparts. But those advantages have vanished or shrunk dramatically in the last few years. Desktop PCs will probably always outperform laptops, but for general consumers outside the rarified air of high-end gaming PCs, laptop performance is good enough for just about any task, largely thanks to Intel developing low power versions of its CPUs and mobile graphics becoming more powerful, too. Laptop reliability has greatly improved, thanks to better construction quality and advances like accelerometers that automatically park hard drive heads when a fall is underway. And then there's price, where laptops have also found their way to competing against desktops, with capable models available for $500 to $800, about what you'd have to spend to get a decent desktop.

Really, desktop PCs should be in even worse shape than they are now, except the corporate market -- where the mobility of easily-stolen laptops is often a liability rather than a benefit -- has kept the business alive almost singlehandedly. But even that's likely to change in the near future. As Reuters reports, equipment manufacturers are now shifting production away from desktop-size components and towards parts for laptops and other gadgets. And you can't make a desktop PC without a case, a motherboard, and desktop-sized RAM.

Then again, I guess you could always make a desktop using laptop parts.

Lots more commentary in this Reuters story.

Comments on Desktops are dying, slain by laptops

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by claylof on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    Please tell us all we need to know about docking stations.

  • 7 Posted by crash_davis6 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    The only reason I even have a desktop now is to be the main server for my media center. That can be upgraded by indiviual parts. Outside of that, the laptop is plenty useful.

  • 8 Posted by coolkyle4@snet.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    Desktops FTW! You forgot to mention that laptops have a max of 120gb hard drive, unless u have an external hard drive. The speed of desktops, make me love them more than laptops. Mainly, I can say that majority of the time, I can use a laptop to do what I do on my desktop, but sometimes when it comes to the use of photo editing programs, laptops can't handle it. That, and if I ever get back into pc gaming once in a while, I wouldn't trust a laptop to perform as good, no matter what game it is.

  • 9 Posted by coolkyle4@snet.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    Desktops FTW! You forgot to mention that laptops have a max of 120gb hard drive, unless u have an external hard drive. The speed of desktops, make me love them more than laptops. Mainly, I can say that majority of the time, I can use a laptop to do what I do on my desktop, but sometimes when it comes to the use of photo editing programs, laptops can't handle it. That, and if I ever get back into pc gaming once in a while, I wouldn't trust a laptop to perform as good, no matter what game it is.

  • 10 Posted by coolkyle4@snet.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    Desktops FTW! You forgot to mention that laptops have a max of 120gb hard drive, unless u have an external hard drive. The speed of desktops, make me love them more than laptops. Mainly, I can say that majority of the time, I can use a laptop to do what I do on my desktop, but sometimes when it comes to the use of photo editing programs, laptops can't handle it. That, and if I ever get back into pc gaming once in a while, I wouldn't trust a laptop to perform as good, no matter what game it is.

  • 11 Posted by ovilacote00 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am on my 3rd laptop. I cannot sit at a desk top pc for more than 30 minutes due to a neck injury. I can use my laptop all day. The HP laptap that I have now weighs appox 6 pounds and is faster than any of my friends desktops. The coolest thing about is I can hook it up to my 47 inch flatscreen and watch a dvd or whatever I have downloaded from the internet. try doing that with your home pc.

  • 12 Posted by alan_r_cam on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    Don't call it a Desktop - call it a low end SERVER. My home desktop, for example, serves out video & audio with an XBox360 as a client (sigh- wi----- could handle DivX).

  • 13 Posted by nolo_8 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    What the heck are you talking about coolkyle4@snet.net? I just bought a laptop 2 months ago (with a 160 GB HD) and had the option to customize it with 320 GB. So yeah...120GB is not the max limit on laptops, wow, talk about misinformed.

  • 15 Posted by oceanairimagery on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    Awww, laptops are so cute. Ideal for most travelers and oh so convenient. Now lets get serious for just a minute... Try grinding out any type of photo or video processing on a laptop with a web browser open, with your word document and Outlook up, and see how long it takes you to pull your hair out. It's like running on a 1995 dial-up modem. Now, lets try it on my desktop with 4G of Ram (I could easily use 8G but not necessary), a terabyte hard drive and 22 inch widescreen. Getting twice the work done in a tenth the time. I think anyone using computers for serious applications would agree....I'd rather unplug the desktop, pack it up and take it with me than use my laptop for the heavy stuff.

  • 16 Posted by neegajae12 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    You can take laptops everywhere and do work wherever u want. BUT, the fact still remains that desktops are cheaper for the same specs. I prefer using my desktop over my laptop because it's faster, supports dual screens, and is much easier for gaming. 17" laptops should not be considered laptops at all.. it's not even portable...

  • 17 Posted by jedimaster_gary on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is a ridiculous article. A.) the laptops being sold for less money are using AMD processors(Intel laptops still average 100 dollars more) B.) laptops don't have enough air space to get cooled off using a quad core and large quantities of RAM. let alone the graphics required for gaming. I dont see to many businesses that want to switch to computers any employee could walk off with. for your 800 dollar laptop I could get a very nice PC (I added totals at new egg quad core AMD 4 gigs 1066 RAM a nice video card i think it was Nvidia 9000 series with 512 RAM a 17 inch LCD and Vista 64 bit. Total price $615 w/ shipping) so for the average run laptop I could own a fairly high end gaming system and upgrade the 17 inch to a nice 19 or 21 inch.

  • 18 Posted by zachnorik on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    To #5. YEAH! Screw laptops. I don't even like them anyway. Horrible for gaming. They're all business, you know?

  • 19 Posted by welchgrape on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    @coolkyle4, my refurb HP has a 160 gb HD and it is over a year old.

  • 20 Posted by bostonfan150 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    I do agree, but I don't understand why the desktops stopped being such better deals than laptops. You used to be able to get twice the capability in a desktop then you could in a laptop for half the price. What happened?

  • 21 Posted by rexfutbol on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    It always depends on how do you work. If you're a travelling worker than laptop is your ultimate weapon. On the other hand, a non-travelling worker will need a desktop. So, in my opinion, the debat on desktop vs laptop isn't important because you can't compare them with a lot of criteria to be considered. Just enjoy them like I do since I'm using both.

  • 22 Posted by gnarass on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    #4 I agree!! thats a great way to look at it. I like the feeling and comfort of of a desktop. think of a laptop as a mobile lab and the desktop as the base lab with all the heavy equipment...

  • 23 Posted by herb90027 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    You would be hard pressed to find a laptop that can handle a serious game like Crysis, Farcry 2, etc...for that you need a desktop, along with photo/video editing. For the regular joe blow, laptops are just fine. I have a laptop, 2 gaming desktops and a 'regular" desktop. I can see where laptops would be preferred by most, but as long as they keep making parts for my gaming desktop, I'm a happy camper....I expect eventually they will have the technology down where you can do anything on a laptop, but until then, long live my desktop.....

  • 24 Posted by bottlecounter@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    I can't see myself ever using a laptop. Too slow & underpowered. Plus I have yet to see one that had a decent sized keyboard!

  • 25 Posted by pbdavey on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm really surprised that no one mentions (and this goes for All-In-Ones also) that there are pieces that get thrown out as a result of obsolete hardware. The monitor I'm staring at will last longer than the box it's hooked up to, as will the keyboard and mouse. Considering that most computers have mercury (among other toxic elements) in them, disposal isn't trivial. Now if they were to make notebook components pluggable, where you are really buying a chassis, screen, keyboard, and pointing device...then I think notebooks would be more reasonable, but then you'd probably never find a chassis that was "just right". It's also interesting to read people touting high-end applications (games, etc) as proof by contradiction when an exclusion was mentioned in the blog.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.