Mon Feb 2, 2009 1:44PM EST
See Comments (7)
Unless you're a digital artist or professional photographer, you probably don't give color accuracy much consideration. But if you've ever wondered why little Johnny looks a bit green when you're flipping through digital photos on your laptop, maybe you should. While the color accuracy of your LCD remains a topic largely of interest to the pros, digital photo expert Rob Galbraith found that even inexpensive laptops can have great color... and some of the sacred cows of the business may not be as sophisticated as you'd think.
Galbraith took four laptops -- two ThinkPads, including the new ultra-pricey W700, which includes an integrated color calibration system, a recent 15-inch Apple MacBook Pro, and a cheap Dell Insipiron Mini 9 -- and used a range of professional-grade color sampling and correction tools to measure how accurately colors were being displayed on the laptop screen. Galbraith also measured how well colors held up when the viewer wasn't front and center before the laptop, looking head-on at the display.
The results: As expected, the ThinkPad W700, with the integrated color management system, was the winner on both counts. But a surprise was in store regarding the placement of the Apple MacBook in Galbraith's tests: Dead last, finishing up behind even the Dell netbook, which by all expectations shouldn't even come close in this kind of testing.
That's shocking, especially considering Apple's reputation in the digital art and design community, an industry where it enjoys a virtual monopoly.
The picture was a little different if looking at viewing angle as a prime consideration: The two ThinkPads swapped places, and the MacBook earned third in Galbraith's testing.
As a side note, Galbraith notes that even the best laptop screens won't hold a candle to a good external monitor, so anyone making serious design decisions should hook up an external display whenever color representation is important. All other laptop users -- unless you have a W700, the only machine Galbraith rated as "above acceptable" -- should expect color accuracy to be iffy at best and plan accordingly.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
That was interesting about where the Apple fell into place. I have to find a good calibration program to try out. I tried Apple's built in stuff, but the more I tried to work with it, the worse the display got.
i may be a buyer of this kind of product what technicaly it is a powerful device. what i want to give a suggesion that technilly sofisticated things are so expensive please if you are intersted to become atechnically large company keep low prize of tecnologies,......
That's all interesting. However, in order for this story to be complete, we need the technical specs of the screens that were tested here. Does the W700 feature a TN, an IPS or PVA panel. What type of backlighting is used. And all the rest ...
still, good old CRT is the best choice.. LCD technology is just defective, i hope it will be replaced by something superior.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by nerd160 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:36PM EDT Report Abuse
I am not suprised about the Mini 9. I have one and it is one of the best screens, on a laptop, I have seen.