Windows 7 version lineup revealed: Prepare for disappointment

Wed Feb 4, 2009 5:31PM EST

See Comments (988)

Remember when Vista was announced, and Microsoft decided to release six different versions of the operating system, much to the confusion, disappointment, and ridicule of potential buyers? Well guess what? Microsoft is back with the Windows 7 strategy. What has it learned in the last three years? Pretty much nothing.

While Microsoft is touting the "two primary editions" of Windows 7 -- a Home Premium edition and a Professional (intended for business) edition -- the fact is it's sticking with the same six different versions (or SKUs, stock-keeping units) that it had for Vista.

The real difference is that Windows 7 Home Basic -- the much-reviled stripped-down version of Vista that was designed for bare-bones PCs -- is now being shunted to emerging markets only, though it will still exist. But to confuse matters, a Windows 7 Starter edition, which will run only three applications simultaneously, will also be available.

Also a glimmer of hope: Home Premium will have most of the same features you're used to in Vista Home Premium, but the new Windows 7 Professional is a nice improvement over Vista Business Edition in that Windows 7 Pro will include all of the features from Home Premium (including Media Center and gaming capabilities), plus some other business-centric extras. If there's a bright spot in this news, it's that the Pro version finally looks enticing, unlike the neutered business version of Vista that was pawned off on workplaces two years ago.

But Microsoft blows it again with two more SKUs, again offering an Enterprise and Ultimate version of Windows 7, both containing features that ought to be included off the shelf in Windows 7 Professional. That means nickel-and-diming buyers once again in order to get the BitLocker encryption system.

Microsoft touts the new SKU structure as a "streamlining" of its product line, but I'm having trouble seeing how the Windows 7 lineup is much of an improvement. Things seemed to work pretty well with XP's two versions -- and the Mac folks get along fine with just one. But in an attempt to wring every last dollar out of every last customer, Microsoft again sticks us with a complicated version nightmare that no one's going to like. Is the honeymoon over already? Dang.

Engadget has a helpful comparison guide to the six versions here.

Update: Many people have written to emphasize that Windows 7 will only be available to consumers in three retail versions. While it's accurate that only three shrinkwrapped versions will be available, it's quite likely that your average user will have access to five different versions: Millions of users will use Enterprise at the office and millions more will encounter Starter on a netbook (the fastest-growing portion of the computer market). Faced then with Home Premium, Professional, and Ultimate editions on a standard PC, the options quickly become overwhelming when, really, two or even one version of the software would have sufficed. Also note that I am still enthusiastic about Windows 7 on its merits -- I simply think that the version proliferation should be rethought.

Comments on Windows 7 version lineup revealed: Prepare for disappointment

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 46 Posted by blackstone_gal on Sat Feb 7, 2009 1:47PM EST Report Abuse

    Ha Ha Ha!! I knew this would happen. Microsoft in general are a bunch of crooks! This is why I use Linux. It never disappoints me. I tried Vista when it first came out. What a joke!! Now Windows 7 looks like it has blown it. Good luck all you gung ho Windows users!!

  • 47 Posted by nazgullo on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am sticking with the XP untill something better comes along.MS affectionately known as the "Beast" havent learned a thing..

  • 49 Posted by jayson_60120 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    I will never sell my computer running XP. Period.

  • 50 Posted by cioky7 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    that s what happens when all those ceo's have so much money. they dont care, and they act like idiots. the main tasks of a new opperating system should be applications compatibility, speed improvements and security. wtf? are they on drugs or what?

  • 51 Posted by alex_stevens on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    And Microsoft can't figure out why so many people are bailing for Macs (and I don't own a Mac)

  • 52 Posted by jeffreybateman1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    Until Microsoft pulls ilts haed out of its butt im sticking with XP PRo

  • 53 Posted by carsrock503 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    @ "sorbjornstad": WHOA WHOA WHOA. You are so wrong. OSX upgrades are $129. That's it. Anndd... how much does an upgrade of Windows start at? And how much is it for an ACTUALLY good upgrade? Yeah... more than $129.

  • 54 Posted by nickdc1960 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am perfectly happy runnint Windows Vista Premium. Lots of folks complain about the "bugs" in it, but those that complain have never used it! But, I give Christopher Null credit. He's actually described the REAL REASON that people never made the migration to Windows Vista...if you give people too many choices, they won't know which to pick! Congratulations! Microsoft needs to hire Mr. Null as their VP of Marketing. http://www.creditmanagementworld.com

  • 55 Posted by lucasblond on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    Just one more example of how much Microsoft sucks. That's why I am a Mac user. Macs run MS programs better than Microsoft.

  • 56 Posted by vol_jadzia on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'll just stick to my WIN VISTA for now. Perhaps I'll even take advantage of the education discount through my university and buy a laptop while I can still get VISA.

  • 57 Posted by crispeblac on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    Vista and now 7 these OS are jokes, Instead of coming up with quarky applications I wish Microsoft would just go back and continue to build on the XP OS. I use XP still and have no desire to change unless I can no longer get support.

  • 58 Posted by armychic102000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am feeling the same as great deal of other windows customers....I will be sticking with XP until it is no longer supported by windows. Windows 98 and ME were no longer supported in 2005, so it should be a while until XP is no longer supported. I like XP and I don't understand why Vista was even created since it is like a messed up version of XP. Why is microsoft going backwards instead of forward? Its very disappointing!

  • 59 Posted by ajpierson1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    I will be running Windows XP for the rest of my life, if Microsoft keeps this up... Microsoft has forgotten what an operating system is supposed to do. Rather than continuously improving an already good set of OS's that they previously had, they have simply decided to continue taking the same junk, and throwing tons of useless gadgetry at it, along with pointless features. And if 7 is going to be as uptight about "security" as Vista was, then I dont know what the world will come to...

  • 60 Posted by anthony_ferlito on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is so absurd. I just got used to vista, and now their gonna go release a new freakin o.s. Most people are still running XP anyway.

  • 61 Posted by dhruma90 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    XP will always be the best but VISTA has a nice look to it and i don't even want to bother with 7

  • 62 Posted by pselcke on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have an eMac purchased seven years which is still running strong on OSX and a new iMac that runs like a dream. Why is anyone still buying Microsoft products? You might save a little money, but in the long run, you're losing time and patience when downloading patches, anti-virus ware, anti-spy ware, etc.

  • 63 Posted by longboarder870 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    I find microsofts plans to be shallow and pedantic hahahha

  • 64 Posted by wehigha on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    It would be nice if they could just come up with an operating system that did not crash over and over and over!

  • 65 Posted by thieljr on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    i've had vista since it came out. i'm still waiting to have my first problem with it.

More Posts: First Prev 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.