Windows 7 version lineup revealed: Prepare for disappointment

Wed Feb 4, 2009 5:31PM EST

See Comments (988)

Remember when Vista was announced, and Microsoft decided to release six different versions of the operating system, much to the confusion, disappointment, and ridicule of potential buyers? Well guess what? Microsoft is back with the Windows 7 strategy. What has it learned in the last three years? Pretty much nothing.

While Microsoft is touting the "two primary editions" of Windows 7 -- a Home Premium edition and a Professional (intended for business) edition -- the fact is it's sticking with the same six different versions (or SKUs, stock-keeping units) that it had for Vista.

The real difference is that Windows 7 Home Basic -- the much-reviled stripped-down version of Vista that was designed for bare-bones PCs -- is now being shunted to emerging markets only, though it will still exist. But to confuse matters, a Windows 7 Starter edition, which will run only three applications simultaneously, will also be available.

Also a glimmer of hope: Home Premium will have most of the same features you're used to in Vista Home Premium, but the new Windows 7 Professional is a nice improvement over Vista Business Edition in that Windows 7 Pro will include all of the features from Home Premium (including Media Center and gaming capabilities), plus some other business-centric extras. If there's a bright spot in this news, it's that the Pro version finally looks enticing, unlike the neutered business version of Vista that was pawned off on workplaces two years ago.

But Microsoft blows it again with two more SKUs, again offering an Enterprise and Ultimate version of Windows 7, both containing features that ought to be included off the shelf in Windows 7 Professional. That means nickel-and-diming buyers once again in order to get the BitLocker encryption system.

Microsoft touts the new SKU structure as a "streamlining" of its product line, but I'm having trouble seeing how the Windows 7 lineup is much of an improvement. Things seemed to work pretty well with XP's two versions -- and the Mac folks get along fine with just one. But in an attempt to wring every last dollar out of every last customer, Microsoft again sticks us with a complicated version nightmare that no one's going to like. Is the honeymoon over already? Dang.

Engadget has a helpful comparison guide to the six versions here.

Update: Many people have written to emphasize that Windows 7 will only be available to consumers in three retail versions. While it's accurate that only three shrinkwrapped versions will be available, it's quite likely that your average user will have access to five different versions: Millions of users will use Enterprise at the office and millions more will encounter Starter on a netbook (the fastest-growing portion of the computer market). Faced then with Home Premium, Professional, and Ultimate editions on a standard PC, the options quickly become overwhelming when, really, two or even one version of the software would have sufficed. Also note that I am still enthusiastic about Windows 7 on its merits -- I simply think that the version proliferation should be rethought.

Comments on Windows 7 version lineup revealed: Prepare for disappointment

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by rogueist on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am dissapointed in Microsoft too. They only needed to make 2 versions - one for PCs and one for embedded systems.

  • 7 Posted by synyster_7x on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have to say, after all this... Apple is starting to look even better than ever before.

  • 8 Posted by phatboy3k on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    How is Mac OS X "so expensive"? It's discounted at $110 from Amazon, and every feature is included, no limitations. Windows Vista MSRP is $129 for the most basic version available (I guess that's the basic version. I'm a Mac-Exclusive user, so I have no idea what SP1 is, aside from that fact that you have to have it to run pretty much any program supported by Windows). Mac OS X MSRP is $129 for the only version available. Seems to me that they're both about the same price

  • 10 Posted by shadowman_26 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    XP doe shave DX10, but you need to hack in order for it to work. I run Vista everyday and never once had a problem with it. I have run 7 beta 32 and 64 bit versions. As long as M$ doesn't go adding alot of crap(like they did with Vista) it will be a very good OS. But I agree, they do need to limit OS choices. I can see 3 versions. Home, Professional, and Ultimate. I don't see the need for Starter or Basic versions. I am waiting word on the cost. My guess, is more than Vista, which will be a shame.

  • 11 Posted by xlilxkid24 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is just bs... come 6 versions? just home premium and ultimate would be good enough. Basic is just freaking useless...... its one of the most useless things out of the 6.....

  • 12 Posted by dmhoo29 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why doesn't Microsoft just make one OS with the option of purchasing the extra features like BitLocker and such. ooops. I forgot. It's Micro$oft. I'll keep Vista.

  • 13 Posted by johnohan on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    This decision proves that this company is run by morons. It also proves that Microsoft is a greedy and selfish company. I am not an Apple fan, but I salute them for having just one OS for the end user. I don't know when will stubborn Microsoft get the message and start acting as a smart and caring company. These latest decision shows that they haven't learned. I was hoping that after they fumbled Vista they will do better next time. There should be just one version: Ultimate. All I can say is this: SHAME ON YOU MICROSOFT.

  • 15 Posted by anson_lego on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    Three programs..."Starter". Microsoft hopes that "beginners" buy the starter version then upgrade for more money to a "Pro" version. Apple's OSX makes things easier all the features in one for one low cost.

  • 16 Posted by givmeapenny on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am impressed with them going from dos to now but I agree their are rakeing in the money and I relly dont get much more out of a pc than text, all the bells and wisles are just not needed. Mabey they feel obligated to be our everything.

  • 17 Posted by dakjak27 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    Perhaps, if this is so confusing for you, maybe you shouldn't own a computer... I can see if your used to a mac, how it would be easily confusing for you.... good luck! Oh and dont forget to breath in AND out....

  • 18 Posted by a2strains on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    "OSX is so expensive"? It's always around $120-130 at retail instead of $200 or more for Windows stuff.

  • 19 Posted by andrebesselaar on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am actually sick and tired of Microsoft's business tactics and want to get away from MS in every possible way. I have been an ardent fan since they started, but now it's the same old story all over again. I have migrated to open source office, great and don't miss MS office, now for an OS. I consult and a lot of my clients are going the same route. MS will have to change their way of doing things or they might have problems soon.

  • 20 Posted by j.simms@rogers.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is the perfect excuse I have been looking for to get a Mac. I bought Vista Ultimate in order to get all those "cool" things that were supposed to come with *only* ultimate... that was disappointing. I will stick with my vista, but put my money on a new mac. im done with microsoft, at least for now.

  • 21 Posted by cjmartinez on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm also staying with XP until something starts going up in smoke. Then, switching to Mac. Had enough of MS.

  • 22 Posted by al9226 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is the reason that I use Linux Kubuntu. It's fast, reliable and free. I keep one computer with win xp to run a couple of business applications that won't run on linux, but do everything else on Kubuntu ALG

  • 23 Posted by gemini_1940 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    What is the matter with the so-called "brains" at Microsoft? Why do they want put out something on the market that is not fully functional or fully tested before releasing to the unsuspecting public? There is enough frustration trying to get something accomplished on a daily basis. Secondly, after getting used to a great version of Windows they drop their support(i.e. Windows 98) to force you buy another version and your frustration starts all over.

  • 24 Posted by taficke on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    If you think OS X is expensive compared to Microsoft you are utterly incorrect. $149.99 for a full fledged OS or $500 for a full fledged OS. Os if you want to get even more into it. $149 full OS compared to $149 and 3 programs at a time.

  • 25 Posted by dgburns17 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    I suppose the counter to "wring every last dollar out of every last customer" would be DON'T CHARGE PEOPLE FOR WHAT THEY DON'T WANT! You know, not all of us WANT all the bloat with the higher priced versions!!!

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.