Fri Feb 6, 2009 11:41AM EST
See Comments (955)
I don't watch much broadcast TV, and when I do I skip as many commercials as possible, but even I have seen the incessant televised advertisements for a company called Cash4Gold, and I'm sure most of you have, too (they even had a Super Bowl ad). The company is being heavily promoted online as well.
The sell sounds great on the surface: You pack up all your old jewelry that you'll never wear again into an envelope and send it, insured, to Cash4Gold. They melt it down and cut you a check for the value of the gold. End of process. It sounds better than going to a pawn shop -- the process is simple and requires no personal interaction with an appraiser -- so what could go wrong?
A little online sleuthing finds that I'm not the only one who figures that if Cash4Gold has this much money to spend on TV ads, someone's getting the short end of the stick, and it's probably the people sending in their family heirlooms to be melted into ingots. The folks at Cockeyed.com put Cash4Gold to the test, rounding up a bunch of old rings, necklaces, and earrings, and taking them to a regular pawn shop to be appraised. The offer: $198 for the lot. They then sent the items to Cash4Gold and waited for a check in the mail. It arrived within a few days as promised... in the amount of 60 bucks. (You don't have to accept the check; the deal isn't done until you cash it.)
That price alone is practically criminal, but that's where the truly slimy part of the operation begins. First, if you call Cash4Gold and ask for your stuff back, you abruptly get a better offer: In the case of the above experiment, the offer was a whopping $178. That's a better deal, but still not market rate, though the caller was told that Cash4Gold could "manipulate the numbers on their end" to make it appear that more product was sent than was in reality. Bizarre, but it's really the only way Cash4Gold can cover its behind to convince you the original offer wasn't a wholesale ripoff.
As bad as that is, it's far worse if you opted for the company's "Fast Cash" option. Here, that original offer ($60) is wired into your bank account within 24 hours of them receiving the booty. It sure is fast, but it's not much cash -- and you don't have the option of declining the offer at all. You're stuck with a pittance for your valuable gold items. (It's also worth noting that a publicist working for Cash4Gold later offered Cockeyed cash (allegedly without Cash4Gold's involvement) for removing its expose from the web...)
Update: More test results on Cash4Gold and other online gold buyers here from Channel 10 San Diego.
Update 2: Cash4Gold's PR agency has requested the removal of this post, calling it defamatory. I have amended certain language in this post to clarify the source of some of the content within.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Hey kmarak, this country also has in the constitution as the first amendment, freedom of speech. And unless he is committing slander or libel he is free to say what he wants, which includes exposing the very bad deal that cash4gold is. Nothing about exposing criminals, scumbags, and the like is what anybody in their right mind would consider socialist.
Anyone that sends their gold off to someone else to "appraise" is in a questionable mental state anyway. Isn't it like saying, "Here, you can rip me off!" I wonder if any of those people send their bank account information to the Nigerian General Namdbi (or whoever the current holder of the $50,000,000.00 is) so that they can reveive thier half for letting them use their bank account!!!
Does anyone else wish that Update 2 said "Cash4Gold's PR agency has requested the removal of this post, calling it defamatory. I called it freedom of the press?"
Dear sir we can supplier you a gold dust you can use to product gold jewelry meanwhile in good arrangement our agent can deliver the goods in your country. i waiting for your advice. timyawu@gmail.com Thank
I think everyone is missing the point. All businesses are into making a profit. but there is still a difference between making a profit and gouging people. Say you have $200 GOLD VALUE(NOT WHAT YOU PAID RETAIL) and i pay you at least half. You may say fine, you gotta deal. If you have $200 worth of gold and I try and pay you 35 bucks. thats a ripoff. were talking about GOLD here. not some collectible. They will probably take the good pieces and try to get some retail value back out of them, you never know. making a profit is one thing. ripping people off is called GREED.
If I had known what a real and true ripoff this would be I would have never thought twice and held on to all my things. Heck a pawn shop gives you better and they are sceamers.
I got ripped of buy them!!! BIG TIME!!!
BEWARE!!! I sent £410 worth of gold to SGUK or scrap gold UK. They made me pay to post a special delivery pack to them and then said they never received it. The packet was signed for so one of three things has happened.......... 1. They stole it and didnt pay me. 2. The postman stole it. 3. The postman delivered it to the wrong address and someone else stole it. Because royal mail has a signature they are saying that it was delivered correctly and wont pay my loss claim. SPECIAL DELIVERY is not the cast iron guarantee you think it will be and at the end of the day you are relying on the honesty of the postman and the person receiving the packet. I now wish I had never bothered and will never use special delivery again.
Has anyone seen the videos?
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
946 Posted by glenn_p@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:10PM EDT Report Abuse
Take a look at the bottom of the page below the comments. When I read this article there were 3 "Sponsored" links for sites eagerly awaiting your gold items in the mail to pay you cash for them. That's pretty hypocritical to denounce these type of businesses in the editorial commentary and then take their money for "sponsoring" the link. Way to go Yahoo!