Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:57PM EST
See Comments (5)
Warning: Heavy nerd language lies ahead!
Today Intel announced a huge investment -- $7 billion to be spent in 2009 alone -- to push its CPU production process into the 32nm arena. For those of you who don't understand what that means, "nm" or "nanometer" refers to the size of certain microchip components, and every couple of years the microchip community shrink those down. This is essential for a number of reasons: Smaller chip components means you can fit more of them on a single CPU (or die), and since the components can be put closer together, a CPU using the smaller technology will use less power and generate less heat than one that uses larger components. The upshot: Faster, cooler, more efficient CPUs.
Intel's current top-of-the-line chips -- including the Core line -- use a 45nm process. Code-named Westmere, the new 32nm chips will essentially use the same chip design as the Core i7 (part of the Nahelem architecture), just shrunken down. An upcoming chip, code-named Sandy Bridge, will take the 32nm process and apply it to a new design. (As a side effect of the 32nm investment, some of the 45nm chips on Intel's current roadmap will instead be "de-prioritized," or essentially canceled.)
Westmere-class chips will go into production, for both desktops and mobile computers, in the fourth quarter of this year (and hopefully arrive in actual computers at retail soon after). This is especially good news for laptop users, since Core i7 has not been adapted for mobiles.
Also of note, at least one of the Westmere-class processors (code-named Gulftown... yes, another code name) will support up to six cores per chip by 2010. And two of the 32nm chips will also support a separate graphics processor directly within the chip package itself, which means theoretically much better graphics performance from any computer that's not using a standalone graphics card. (The two chips with graphics processing inside the CPU package have their own code names, too: Clarkdale on desktops and Arrandale on laptops.)
Meanwhile, Intel says the production roadmap is on schedule for the foreseeable future: 22nm chips should be on tap for late 2011.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Hmm with people crying about window vista and window 7 would it be better to make a faster and better computer chip. Look like intel in the right direction except some still want to hold onto window xp and that ten years old computer.
you know i like windows vista it works well for me.Windows xp will not let me download and store some video streaming i do With vista my real player automatically asks if i want to download and save..So in my humble opinion vista is okay by me
finally beyond the 4ghz barrier....YAY!!! but i think multi-core is the way to go...see the 'telsa' add-on chip from NVIDIA. seems worth the money...... HOW MANY CORES do YOU have?? I have [900+] sitting on my desk.Joke of the century. No I just have two, but it is a good upgrade option.never have to worry if the computer is oudated or slow ever again. VISTAs issues go WAY beyond proc bottlenecks.Its slime infecting your computer slowly and turning both the PC and what you do against you. Check the EULA. M$ OWNS you.
On the flip side... IBM, HP and Google are investing heavily in the Cloud, which I think makes more sense than attempting to provide yet faster secular supercomputers. Cloud and collective distributive processing represents the future, a future that allows Quantum computing and coherent optical processing to wedge in at the net node level... secularism is outmoded in today's global profit model, and yet here is Intel trying to wring out the last dollars from embedded zealots?! In so doing, they are hedging their bet, and their future, on selfish, limited small minded users in a world where online services, have already decreed their final demise... a sad policy, for a greedy, sad user base. The day of the personal supercomputer... is over.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by aa4mw on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:43PM EDT Report Abuse
Windows vista's problems have nothing whatever to do with CPU speed! Lets wait and see on W7. With a trillion dollar loss to computer cime last year it is really heartwarming see that Microsoft is taking such good care of us. Or is that heartburn?