Mon Mar 2, 2009 11:28AM EST
See Comments (135)
Hope you didn't buy a Kindle 2 after seeing the text-to-speech feature as its killer app: This weekend Amazon announced that it would be updating the way it works, giving publishers the right to turn off the feature on specific titles as they see fit.
Authors Guild president Roy Blount Jr. initially cried foul over the feature, claiming it was a violation of audiobook copyrights and had to be treated separately (and with an additional payment, of course) under the law. More importantly, Blount noted that computerized speech was improving dramatically and that it would inevitably make human-read books obsolete.
Amazon, while maintaining the text-to-speech feature is legal, said that "many rights holders will be more comfortable with the text-to-speech feature if they are in the driver’s seat." Publishers will now be able to "decide on a title by title basis" whether to turn the text to speech feature on or off. There's no telling how many will take the company up on the offer, but I expect it will be substantial.
While Blount is probably sleeping better, consumer rights advocates are considerably dismayed. The always-astute Lawrence Lessig offers an important history lesson on the subject, noting that in 2001, the very same issue arose over Adobe and its new e-reader -- which got downright silly when a copy of the public-domain, non-copyrightable Alice's Adventures in Wonderland was marked by its publisher is "cannot be read aloud." Is it a matter of time before this happens again?
It's a little surprising that Amazon -- the company that's taking on the state of New York in court over sales tax issues -- backed down so readily over the issue of text-to-speech on the Kindle. Two things are at play, I think: One, Amazon is really trying to push the Kindle and e-books in general right now, and will do anything to avoid controversy here. And two, Amazon actually benefits from this separation of rights: If you have to pay twice for a printed copy of your e-book and a version that can be read aloud, well, that's double the sales commission that Amazon collects.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Why on earth does anybody think that TTS is going to replace audio books soon? It'll be years and years before we ever get human-quality voices out of these. Hawking has one of the best consumer level TTS devices around, and it sounds horrible.
So, Amazon caved... I am very interested in Kindle, but am still waiting for these books to be DRM free. It's just so much easier and "thought-free" when I don't have to worry about DRM and how I use something. The higher the resolution, the better it is too. We are nowhere near true 300-dpi but that's a technical limitation at this point. Speaking of DRM-free, Amazon does have an awesome MP3 store that is DRM-free with a large selection and often good prices. It would be nice if they had the same thing with books. We will probably see faster advancements in this area in the near future as competition heats up. On the note about Amazon, I recently came across an interesting table that details the discounts. Maybe someone will find it useful. It is at http://www.uberi.com
The text to speech feature was the only reason why I was interested in this thing. Thanks a lot you greedy artistic ----- s.
People just need to get out of the way of technology. The rules have changed, stop living in the stone ages people!
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by rommelirico on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse
Way to bow down and take it, Amazon. I was thinking of getting the Kindle2, but now I'm definitely going to wait for the next version or a competitor that doesn't suck. Thanks for the heads up Mr. Null.