CDMA vs. GSM: Which One Is For You?

Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:07PM EDT

See Comments (10)

Reader Scott Weidenhamer writes: I have read so much information on CDMA vs. GSM, also W-CDMA vs. EV-DO, and the more I read the more I can't make up my mind. I want the best technology, with the coolest features, but with great service behind it. (I live in northwest Ohio.) Is that too much to ask? What are your experinces with these technologies?

First, a primer. There are two major cell phone standards in the U.S. (not including the leftovers of the Nextel network, which had its own standard): CDMA and GSM. Verizon and Sprint use CDMA. Cingular and T-Mobile use GSM. So far, so good.

All carriers except T-Mobile now offer high-speed data services, also known as 3G. The high-speed CDMA network (from Verizon and Sprint) is called EV-DO. The high-speed GSM network (from Cingular) is called HSDPA. You might have gotten a little confused when hearing about W-CDMA networks, because a few other countries have W-CDMA networks, but U.S. services don't use this standard.

So, to recap:

Verizon & Sprint = CDMA (slow) and EV-DO (fast)
Cingular = GSM (slow) and HSDPA (fast)

Now to get to your real question: Which of these is best? Well, I've used all of these services extensively, and the first answer is that it depends on where you live. Start by checking out the various coverage locators. Here's Verizon's, and here's Cingular's. These maps aren't great, but they're a start. You can see that with Verizon, service is weak near the Michigan and Indiana borders, but Toledo and Lima are fully covered. Cingular has full coverage of that corner, with no service if you move a bit to the east. Depending on exactly where you live and where you frequently travel, this could determine your decision for you. (Another way to do this is to simply borrow a friend's phone and give the service a try for yourself. If it sounds good, it is good.)

Of course, high-speed access doesn't do you much good when you're just on the phone. Those fast 3G services I mentioned come into play when you're browsing the web, streaming music or video, or using the phone as a modem. These services are far more erratic than the slower voice services. I've had blazing speeds using an EV-DO modem in one hotel, while getting pokey throughput down the street. There's no way to really claim a "winner," though in my experience, HSDPA has much faster overall throughput, while EV-DO covers more of the country. If you travel a lot, you might want to go with EV-DO. If you only go to a few places and you know you can get an HSDPA signal there, I'd say stick with that technology.

I hope this has helped! With its zillions of acronyms, cellular technology is about as confusing as tech gets. Hang in there, and get a hands-on demo before you buy, if at all possible.

Comments on CDMA vs. GSM: Which One Is For You?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by njnuccio on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    ke4qgn- hmmmm lets put "difference between GSM and CDMA." into google (or yahoo since we're here) jsut for sqits and giggles shall we? wouldn't want this whole information at your finger tips thing to be too easy now... would we? well i will in case you couldn't... http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-gsm-and-cdma.htm

  • 7 Posted by mr_jlu on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    Seriously... all you just did was say which services had CDMA and GSM.. then you looked at a coverage map.. I would have expected a little more from someone working for Yahoo.. I could have done better than that.. You should have told the person that the EVDO area (at least for Verizon) is few and far between.. there are only a handfull of cities that have that service (which is pretty sweet with a data plan)... Isn't GSM a type of signal that a person could use overseas? That might be helpful to know as well. And to the person who said he should have talked about the handsets.. get real.. there is no way he could have done all that.. just wayyyy too much info..

  • 8 Posted by katiemiles83 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    The article is a little misleading when he says, "Of course, high-speed access doesn't do you much good when you're just on the phone." That may be true with Verizon, Sprint, and T, but certainly not with Cingular's new HSDPA network. It allows you to do simultaneous voice and data. What does this mean for you? Any business person who spends a lot of time on the phone can surely appreciate the value in incoming emails not being delayed because you were on a call. From what I've read on a couple different sites the PDAs capable of that are going to be launched here shortly. I think then people will see the Cingular 3G network was well worth the wait.

  • 9 Posted by gtoad.rm on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    I've just done 45 minutes of online reading (various sites) regarding CDMA vs GSM. I live in Las Vegas, and have 3+ years experience using GSM (AT&T), and 3+ using CDMA (Verizon). For me, I simply want my phone to be a phone (I save email, etc. for my computer). With that in mind, CDMA (Verizon) slightly trumps GSM (AT&T) in terms of a more consistent signal, and fewer (almost never) dropped calls.

  • 10 Posted by huskwimple on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think sprint cdma is the way to go, they have Evdo REV A on all of their towers, and EDGE is so slow!!! http://www.cell-stuff.net

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.