Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:12PM EST
See Comments (323)
Now that the tech world has had a few days to digest Apple's industry-churning iPhone, it's a good time to step back a bit and dissect the thing. There's no question that, when the iPhone is released this summer, it will be the most advanced and capable phone on the planet...but is that a good thing? Here's a little more on what will probably be 2007's most talked-about gadget.
The OS - The iPhone runs a version of OS X, Apple's standard desktop computer operating system. At first that sounds like cool beyond words...but does it really take a PC OS to make some phone calls? How long will it take the phone to boot up? And how will having such an advanced OS on the phone impact its battery life? These answers are still unclear and won't be hammered out until reviewers have more face time with the device, but my hunch is that the phone's high-power abilities will ultimately outweigh any complexity it has.
Gesture-Based Computing - Remember it's not just a question of the OS, it's how you use it. The iPhone has no buttons, no keyboard, no real external controls: Everything is performed by making taps and zipping your finger along the touchscreen. Called multi-touch, this process will be a revolution in how you interact with the device, which opens up many possibilities...but closes some, too. The big problem? You won't be able to do much with the phone with only one hand, which could be a real pain when you just want to make a quick call.
Wireless - 802.11g Wi-Fi is a good thing, but the lack of 3G service is a terrible oversight. The EDGE data network is simply too slow for regular email usage, not to mention the iPhone's next-generation Internet services like real-time mapping. My spidey sense tells me that iPhone 2 will have 3G front and center in its feature set. It's also worth noting that the iPhone is a GSM phone and only available on the Cingular network. Sprint and Verizon users hoping for a CDMA version shouldn't hold their breath. I highly doubt this will ever happen.
Music - Are people really ready to replace two devices (phone and MP3 player) with one? Signs definitely point to yes on that front, but anyone with an iPod with more than 8GB of storage in it today has got to be disappointed that Apple decided not to create an iPhone with a hard drive in it. On the other hand, the decision to run with flash instead of a hard drive makes perfect sense: Phones get tossed around a lot more than MP3 players, and a hard drive may very well be too fragile for such active use. It would also make the iPhone much heavier. While I doubt 100GB hard drive-based iPhones will appear in the near future, the door's open for 16GB and 32GB models, as flash memory in that density already exists (though at extreme prices). I'd expect these upgrades by the end of the year or mid-2008.
The Cash - Gulp. Then there's the not-so-small issue of price. At $599 for the 8GB phone, the iPhone is out of reach for the vast majority of users who pay $150 or less for their handset. Don't expect prices to fall soon after release, either. That simply isn't Apple's ballgame, and the iPhone will always be a premium product. (Don't expect discounts from Cingular, either. I anticipate that, much like the Nintendo Wii, it will be difficult to find an iPhone on release even at full price.) On the other hand, I've seen $600 (or more) cell phones in the past, and they were hardly anything to write home about.
Bottom line: The iPhone may have flaws, but it is still undeniably cool and will change the cell phone market the same way the iPod changed digital music. There's a reason it was the most talked-about gadget at CES, a show where it wasn't even introduced. I already want one. What about you?
Disclosure: The iPhone is slated to use Yahoo! Mail and oneSearch, which are owned and operated by Yahoo! Inc., which also owns and operates Yahoo! Tech.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
My wife and I will each be getting one in June. People complaining about the price...go out and buy the latest Palm/Treo Smart Phone and an 8 gig iPod and see how much it costs you. The iPhone will cost less AND not having to cary around two devices is just the icing on the cake. : )
I would love to have the iphone. It's so nice and so different than the other one. Only problem is that i am currently using Verizon and don't really want to switch to Cingular. I have had bad experience with them. I just hope that Apple will consider using Verizon along with Cingular and other wireless companies. I am sure they will grab alot more customers by expanding instead of limited to just one company.
Well, its a phone...with an iPod Nano built in. More too-bads than too-goods: - The already mentioned EDGE (low speed) network. - Being stuck with Cingular, or whatever they are going to call themselves today or tomorrow. - No Skype or other Internet\VOIP client: I always expect Apple to do something that will be beyond what I knew I needed or wanted -- like being the first Hybrid phone, sold unlocked and creating new ways to communicate. - No real-time video from the camera...so you could broadcast your vacation to friends or hold face\face meetings via iChat for the road warriors of the world. So, I say it is just another "me-too" product with a pretty interface and no meat behind the makeup. Dare I call it "Newton 2.0" ?
With all the PROBLEMS I have had with my Nano, which was a gift, engraved from my husband, I don't know that I will every buy anything i again. Good luck, and get ready for a whole new bunch of Problems people!
......did you not see the keynote? jobs turned the phone on and off and it booted in less than a second. research helps.
With a $600 price tag Apple is BEGGING to fail. Who knows this iPhone failure may cause a chain of events that may cause the iPod to lose its nigh-monopoly hold on the mp3 market. Probably not, one can drem though :)
i think the biggest oversight is the digitally signed application, this route was tried and tested in the UK when MS and orange released the first windows smartphone OS (long long long long time ago), and what a mess they made of it, i hacked my SPV soon after getting it so i can get some useful apps running, i think a smartphone where you can't run what ever apps you like on it defeats the idea of a smartphone. I guess you can always just buy extortionately expensive software from apple/cingular it be like the DRM they have for the iTunes stuff, just instead of music and movies now it encompasses software too, be nice if they sold the really useful apps at a dollar a go, but chances of that happening is pretty slim thats 5 hour talk time at fullcharge, how much talk time do you have left after listening to music for 2 hours? the balance between MP3 player and phone is going be critical, a device that excels in one and not the other is acceptable, but the market wont tolerate a device that performs mediocre on both counts, and there will be sacrifices that have to be made (battery life is just one example)
i think the biggest oversight is the digitally signed application, this route was tried and tested in the UK when MS and orange released the first windows smartphone OS (long long long long time ago), and what a mess they made of it, i hacked my SPV soon after getting it so i can get some useful apps running, i think a smartphone where you can't run what ever apps you like on it defeats the idea of a smartphone. I guess you can always just buy extortionately expensive software from apple/cingular it be like the DRM they have for the iTunes stuff, just instead of music and movies now it encompasses software too, be nice if they sold the really useful apps at a dollar a go, but chances of that happening is pretty slim thats 5 hour talk time at fullcharge, how much talk time do you have left after listening to music for 2 hours? the balance between MP3 player and phone is going be critical, a device that excels in one and not the other is acceptable, but the market wont tolerate a device that performs mediocre on both counts, and there will be sacrifices that have to be made (battery life is just one example)
Most people already have an IPOD/Nano and a cell phone. Why spend $600 to combine them?
i think the biggest oversight is the digitally signed application, this route was tried and tested in the UK when MS and orange released the first windows smartphone OS (long long long long time ago), and what a mess they made of it, i hacked my SPV soon after getting it so i can get some useful apps running, i think a smartphone where you can't run what ever apps you like on it defeats the idea of a smartphone. I guess you can always just buy extortionately expensive software from apple/cingular it be like the DRM they have for the iTunes stuff, just instead of music and movies now it encompasses software too, be nice if they sold the really useful apps at a dollar a go, but chances of that happening is pretty slim thats 5 hour talk time at fullcharge, how much talk time do you have left after listening to music for 2 hours? the balance between MP3 player and phone is going be critical, a device that excels in one and not the other is acceptable, but the market wont tolerate a device that performs mediocre on both counts, and there will be sacrifices that have to be made (battery life is just one example)
Guys I am not a high tech skilled like you...lol! by the way, will the iphone have a digital camera like the other smartphone devices? It will be cool for $600. in that case, I would like to have one.I am just a liltte curious about this Iphone thing.I plan plan to sell my Trio
I WANT THAT PHONE NOW!! lol kiddin!! it looose so cool
i think the biggest oversight is the digitally signed application, this route was tried and tested in the UK when MS and orange released the first windows smartphone OS (long long long long time ago), and what a mess they made of it, i hacked my SPV soon after getting it so i can get some useful apps running, i think a smartphone where you can't run what ever apps you like on it defeats the idea of a smartphone. I guess you can always just buy extortionately expensive software from apple/cingular it be like the DRM they have for the iTunes stuff, just instead of music and movies now it encompasses software too, be nice if they sold the really useful apps at a dollar a go, but chances of that happening is pretty slim thats 5 hour talk time at fullcharge, how much talk time do you have left after listening to music for 2 hours? the balance between MP3 player and phone is going be critical, a device that excels in one and not the other is acceptable, but the market wont tolerate a device that performs mediocre on both counts, and there will be sacrifices that have to be made (battery life is just one example)
i love all the negativity about this phone and its a fricken phone and ipod with osx in one, there a certain eloquence about it, the joke is that this phone is made for the mac user, its a certain group, the"in" crowd. your comparing this phone to mass reproductions of plastic phones once again just like your plastic pc,s and windowz. this phone is a stepping stone to whats next. all the bashing against apple and osx will just make this phone succeed even more. go apple!!!
Most people already have an IPOD/Nano and a cell phone. Why spend $600 to combine them? Wifi capability alone doesnt justify the cost.
I'm not holding my breath. Cool concept, interesting features, but I'm really concerned with call quality and usability here. We'll see...
Not a good idea at all and I was just about to be an Apple convert! :-(
1. the iphone looks fabutacular. however, what happens if dropped on the pavement? it's a very expensive toy to lose (done that, too). How about including in the design a loop or something to make it possible to hang it off the neck? 2. I hate Cingular, so I'll wait until Jobs or someone else makes an ifone that will work and change with any carrier I choose. 3.I don't care for buttons or touchkeys, it's still a hassle: i hope Apple is working on a voice command version which btw will render clicking btwn the two full and smart spelling obsolete. if there is anything that needs a keyboard, avail spelling command. So much better if/when driving. 4. if Cisco insists on keeping the iphone name, let them have it. I think that replacing the -i- with the -apple logo- may just turn out to be the best advertising Apple can get. Say and hear it a few times and, if you're not a Mac person, you'll run not walk to the nearest Apple store to buy their stuff. and quite possible save mucho dinero on ad campaigns. 5. and do something with that price, Stevie... Most of us live in a world where we have to ask how much it costs, coz we just might not be able to afford it.
No interest on this user's behalf. I carry a cell phone for one reason, portable communication. I leave the other features to the pc at my desk and since I am on Verizon (BY CHOICE - they have Comsummer Guide's best rating) I have no intention of changing carriers! This product does not interest this Buyer even at half the price.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
66 Posted by wut_a_blonde on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:51PM EDT Report Abuse
Personally I think the making of the iPhone was just a waste of time. The fact that it hold music and what not is cool BUT it's not worth the price. AT ALL. I just got a Nano and paid $200 for it...I think AND I have a phone that makes calls, checks e-mail etc. And that is ALL I need. People who buy the iPhone must be completely insane. Money does NOT grow on trees here people. And I agree with you the fact that you don't have any buttons...what a pain in the butt. :D