Did Apple Borrow the iPhone Design from Someone Else?

Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:24PM EST

See Comments (60)

With any hot, new product, a backlash is inevitable. With Apple's iPhone, which has months to go before arrival on store shelves, the name-calling and cattiness has only just begun. And while many are asking questions about the iPhone's mysteries, the latest speculation has been about its design: Did Apple come up with the touchscreen-and-no-keypad idea all by itself?

Hardly. The touchscreen phone dates back to at least 2003, when a little company called MyOrigo rolled out a surprisingly similar phone. Though it would be considered thick and bulky by today's standards, the MyOrigo mydevice (pictured) featured many of the iPhone's ideas. Naturally, the entire face was a touchscreen without buttons. Punch the appropriate part of the screen and you could make phone calls. Or turn the mydevice on its side and you'd have an instant widescreen display: Like the iPhone, the mydevice had an accelerometer embedded inside it that could recognize which end was "up." The user interface was completely new and customized for the device, which could browse the web, send email, take photos, and play MP3s. Battery life was about nine hours of talk time.

But the mydevice was ahead of its time, and it never found a carrier in the United States. The company went out of existence shortly after sending review units to members of the press... and I have no idea what ultimately became of its staff or its impressive technology.

Late last year, signs of life in the all-touchscreen phone began to flicker again, with BenQ showing off a concept phone that looks startlingly like the iPhone. Yesterday, Engadget noted that an upcoming phone from LG, the KE850, bearsĀ even moreĀ of the same design features as the iPhone, as well. Unlike the BenQ phone, the KE850 appears likely to be headed to market.

It's interesting to note that various message board comments note that the phones are cool to look at but are hard to use, especially for detail-oriented tasks like sending text messages. I wonder if Apple will avoid these criticisms as iPhone inches closer to reality or if its technology is clever enough to correct these mistakes.

But back to the point: Did Apple steal its design from one or all of these devices? I don't really buy it. For starters, touchscreens aren't new at all, dating back to the original Palm Pilot, which looks surprisingly like the iPhone, if you think about it. Getting rid of the keypad and keyboard is certainly a bold and risky move, but considering no company has had success on the market with a keypad-free phone to date, it would be rather silly for Apple to attempt to copy a design that hadn't proven successful. Apple has also been rumored to be working on various touchscreen products for years.

There's also a time issue: The LG was just announced a month ago, and Apple's probably been working on the iPhone for two years. And when you think about it, how many ways are there to design a cell phone that has no buttons? A large rectangle is about the only thing that comes to mind...which is probably why every single one of these phones looks pretty much the same. (Also, Apple's laptops have basically the same design as every other laptop...and no one's complaining about that.)

Ease up, naysayers. If you can whip up a design of a touchscreen phone that doesn't look like anything else ever conceived, let's talk.

Disclosure: The iPhone is slated to use Yahoo! Mail and oneSearch, which are owned and operated by Yahoo! Inc., which also owns and operates Yahoo! Tech.

Comments on Did Apple Borrow the iPhone Design from Someone Else?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 26 Posted by georgeof420 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hey maybe somebody should reinvent the quotation make properly and call it &#39 or somethang!!

  • 27 Posted by vanlam08 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    thts wut they get.i hate it wen ppl copy others

  • 28 Posted by aliveinboulder on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    Everyone steals ideas from one another. That's called competition!

  • 29 Posted by keithbeiler on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    Apple isn't innovative? It seems to me the first personal computer was a mac. Before that, you knew ur backend. Then ol' Gates came along and "borrowed" their wysiwyg, no sueing there, mac should have patented there idea but that was a long time ago... Seems Vista borrowed more ideas yet from Apple. I never have probz w/ my mini or G5s.. runs 5 design programs at a shot and can record audio while doing so. Another reason to go mac - 75 viruses vs pc's 75000 viruses!!!! So just hop on the bandwagon, I guarantee u'll never go back. Ask NASA what they sent to space, ask any designer, ask any recording studio, and the answers clear what the most stable OS is. I'll wait for the price to go down on these phones, but its another awesome product from the best computer company around. Another year and its all over for PCs, So go buy ur stocks boyz and girls, Apples even got a Video game system in the works,, innovative = P

  • 30 Posted by daneendus on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    Oddly enough, I have sitting on my counter here,a product called infogear iPhone. It is a desk top phone, with a screen and keyboard that slides out of the bottom of it. You touch the screen to get to the different places..ie., internet, phone...and several other features. Got it in 2001. It is called iPhone, so what is up with Apple saying that this technology is NEW or even Their own. [Unless they are a part of the infogear Technology Corporation.] Go to www.bigplanet.com . ANYONE INTERESTED IN BUYING IT, BEST OFFER!! *grin*

  • 31 Posted by shamrockamerica2 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is hardly suprising i havnt seen a single stroke of idividuality in technology in a good long while. On second thought the creativity is not in the product being sold, it is actually how two companys sell the same thing with a different name and no body notices.Simply Amzing to say the least.

  • 32 Posted by ipgfool2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    Apple did the same thing with the Mac. Zerox was actually the first company to design the mouse and the event driven operating system.

  • 33 Posted by nightzoo on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    I like the ICell. Cisco will prevail. seriously. Apple should be more creative. ICell, that is good! ICall. whatever.

  • 34 Posted by freefall_192001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:03PM EDT Report Abuse

    Cisco could buy apple a few times over, and still have money left over. cisco buys companies bigger then apple and puts their name on them. if apple is smart they will play nice and behave before cisco sues that pants off them.

  • 35 Posted by roysunnyca on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    The big five phone guys will have something similiar without the heavy price and overhead on the market by Summer 2007 perhaps just a few weeks later. BTW -they'll also promote early to spoil Apple's introduction

  • 36 Posted by b84sharks28 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    Early laptops had their keyboard along the front edge, far from the screen. After Apple moved the keyboard against the hinges on their PowerBooks, all laptops adopted this ergonically correct layout. I am not an Apple fan, but you have to give them kudos for this innovation. Apple should ignore Cisco and call it the iFone to better match the iPod branding. iPhone is too conventional/conservative. Let Cisco keep it, along with the negative press image it conveys.

  • 37 Posted by wave02134 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    IT IS JUST LIKE A ' CHOCOLATE PHONE ' DUH PPL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 39 Posted by wtemple2004 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    hey, anybody can invent something. but it takes finesse to put the whole package together and get it to market. Apple is very adept at doing this, and when was the last time anybody bought a pda or phone from cisco?sorry guys! who dares wins, and the iphone will prob be a big winner! i know i want one!

  • 41 Posted by commorancy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    The first touch screen smart phone was the Handspring with the Visorphone. However, technically, the first all integrated touch screen phone smart phone was the Treo (that I recall). Then, later came the Sony Ericsson P800 in early 2003. The MyOrigo likely came after the P800. The P800 was a smart phone based on SymbianOS and had a fold down keyboard, a widescreen display and a stylus insert (like the Treo). The P800 was a cool phone, but didn't hang around long because they quickly released the P900 and then the P910. These phones were a little bigger than Nokia's smaller phones at the time. As far as I know, the P800 was a full fledged PDA along with media players (mp3 and video) and some kind of gaming engine. Putting that in perspective, the iPhone is a knockoff of all of those previous phones. Even the N-Gage, which has been out for over 2 years, has nearly all the same features that the iPhone sports (with the exception of MacOSX and the wide touchscreen display). So, the iPhone has really already been done. Because the iPhone is closed (no external apps can be loaded easily), SymbianOS phones are still a better bet because these phones are open and allow new apps to be written and installed.

  • 42 Posted by carerragt_2306 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    They could have called it the Apple iFone. Haha. Save the trouble of having to go to court with Cisco. I personally think the iPhone is a great device. I will definitely buy one if the price wasn't so high and if it could have came to the Asian market faster. I'm a Singaporean and I think it will take a million years for Apple to launch it here in Singapore. US$499 = SGD$760+. I think this is actually quite a reasonable price for such a high-tech gizmo. A phone and iPod combined together, it doesn't get any cheaper than this. It's just a pity it's not coming to the Asian markets any faster.

  • 43 Posted by stonepath98 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Apple has had some firsts, let's give them that. Yes, Apple did not invent the MP3 player, the GUI, the mouse and whatever else needs a place on the list. But apparently, to a lot of people, Apple made some product categories better. They think their designs thru very well so they look really good; and they make it easier to use and most of the time, not all the time mind you, they succeed. And yes, they market well. But on the whole, Apple's strength is in industrial design.

  • 44 Posted by deborahpaler on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am "the soul of everyone": writes, the let's face this fact: our given abilities of knowledge (regardless your religious beliefs) we owe to our maker...had our minds not conquered, science, technology, and many other multiplicities, at what stage would our world be???? we can move mountains and should not focus on so much greed... please, just, keep climbing to new heights...why should we not excell???? let us, USA, set the example of not warring over such things as stealing copyrights, ideas, etc...peace and mind and math and lover of design is the tech world, invention ...spread all the knowlwdge and secrets and inginuity and manpower and brain power, high i.q.'s give it all away to others, share it, for, tomorrow may soon be here .....our youths are us, byproducts will come of them, as did we...be happy first then rich, in mind body soul .......!deborahpaler@yahoo.com "the soul of everyonei"...I am...

  • 45 Posted by rovtyw on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    DO you guys even know what you are arguing about? Cisco is sueing Apple for the use of the name iPhone as Cisco is selling an IPX based VoIP phone system under the name IPhone. It is quite surprising to read a bunch of comments posted by people babbling techno jargon when they dont even know the reason for the lawsuit. Cisco isnt sueing Apple for patent infridgment, Cisco just dont want Apple to use the name iPhone as they already have a product under that name. What a bunch of donkeys.(another word for donkey is?)

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.