Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:24PM EST
See Comments (60)
With any hot, new product, a backlash is inevitable. With Apple's iPhone, which has months to go before arrival on store shelves, the name-calling and cattiness has only just begun. And while many are asking questions about the iPhone's mysteries, the latest speculation has been about its design: Did Apple come up with the touchscreen-and-no-keypad idea all by itself?
Hardly. The touchscreen phone dates back to at least 2003, when a little company called MyOrigo rolled out a surprisingly similar phone. Though it would be considered thick and bulky by today's standards, the MyOrigo mydevice (pictured) featured many of the iPhone's ideas. Naturally, the entire face was a touchscreen without buttons. Punch the appropriate part of the screen and you could make phone calls. Or turn the mydevice on its side and you'd have an instant widescreen display: Like the iPhone, the mydevice had an accelerometer embedded inside it that could recognize which end was "up." The user interface was completely new and customized for the device, which could browse the web, send email, take photos, and play MP3s. Battery life was about nine hours of talk time.
But the mydevice was ahead of its time, and it never found a carrier in the United States. The company went out of existence shortly after sending review units to members of the press... and I have no idea what ultimately became of its staff or its impressive technology.
Late last year, signs of life in the all-touchscreen phone began to flicker again, with BenQ showing off a concept phone that looks startlingly like the iPhone. Yesterday, Engadget noted that an upcoming phone from LG, the KE850, bearsĀ even moreĀ of the same design features as the iPhone, as well. Unlike the BenQ phone, the KE850 appears likely to be headed to market.
It's interesting to note that various message board comments note that the phones are cool to look at but are hard to use, especially for detail-oriented tasks like sending text messages. I wonder if Apple will avoid these criticisms as iPhone inches closer to reality or if its technology is clever enough to correct these mistakes.
But back to the point: Did Apple steal its design from one or all of these devices? I don't really buy it. For starters, touchscreens aren't new at all, dating back to the original Palm Pilot, which looks surprisingly like the iPhone, if you think about it. Getting rid of the keypad and keyboard is certainly a bold and risky move, but considering no company has had success on the market with a keypad-free phone to date, it would be rather silly for Apple to attempt to copy a design that hadn't proven successful. Apple has also been rumored to be working on various touchscreen products for years.
There's also a time issue: The LG was just announced a month ago, and Apple's probably been working on the iPhone for two years. And when you think about it, how many ways are there to design a cell phone that has no buttons? A large rectangle is about the only thing that comes to mind...which is probably why every single one of these phones looks pretty much the same. (Also, Apple's laptops have basically the same design as every other laptop...and no one's complaining about that.)
Ease up, naysayers. If you can whip up a design of a touchscreen phone that doesn't look like anything else ever conceived, let's talk.
Disclosure: The iPhone is slated to use Yahoo! Mail and oneSearch, which are owned and operated by Yahoo! Inc., which also owns and operates Yahoo! Tech.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Not impressed, LG's looks similar but superior. Besides they gave it to Cingular. If it was any good it would be shopped to all the biggies. Apple is famous for doling out new devices and testing them on their customers. =)
IPX IS Dead, its an Old Novell protocol Other than that cisco has a lot of push into the home market, ( skype and yahoo will back them on this). The Iphone is one of the HUGE moves cisco wants to make @ HOME. With the purchase of scientific atl, they are going for IP TV. No doubt Cisco has the money, the market with Linksys and their commercial line and time...lots of it.
nobody knows what happend in the mac's develop of iphone just at the end of day we will learn who will take off and it will come to the end who is the winner or @#$% let's ride in just one cutty handset with bunch of brand new features
I hope my carrier carries the iPhone or I will be forced to change... I want this phone!
All of you Mac/Apple zealots are wrong! Some of you would pay $50 for a turd if it was called an iTurd! If Macs were the best computers and Apple had the best marketing why does Apple/Mac control only around 5% of the market share? If either one of these premises were true there would be more market parity or even superiority over Windoze products. Look at facts not your feelings. Take for example what they did with the Newton. They discontinued it just when it might have started to take off and be successful! That's great marketing?? Great marketing led to the VHS tapes capturing the market even though Beta was a better tape. hmm....Maybe some of their marketing is good since the iPod sells so well in spite of the fact that it is way over priced as all Apple products are.
Yep, Handspring Visor Prism was the first: touch screen phone Web browser email applications color screen camera mp3 player gps optional full size keyboard attachment full pda function w/many applications available. It was limited by an 8mb memory, or I'd still be using it! People thought it was wierd to be talking into your pda in those days!
in my opinion, it's not so much about the obvious design similarities. it has more to do with the frailty of apple products. wait for the accidental bump that drops this phone on the floor. just like the ipod, that screen will crack like a thin shelled egg. $600 down the toilet. hope they honor your warranty!!!!
of course it is their design.
In response to post 57.. When you buy your iPhone from Cingular, be sure to include the insurance plan with the phone. This way, when it breaks or gets scratched badly (and it probably will), then you can easily get a replacement without having to shell out another $600. In response to post 47, Apple's desktop product design is excellent. But, I've not been nearly impressed by their portable devices (at least for durability). Yes, their industrial designers know how to create pleasing shapes and eye catching designs but they are not durable. Perhaps they need to go back to making products out of Magnesium (for durability) like the old NeXT boxes. The combination chrome, flat or shiny black or white plastic with large area screens (compared to the device) just beg to be scratched up in short order. Nokia's designs, while very functional and durable, aren't near the level of design sophistication of Apple. But, I'd rather have durability over pleasing shapes any day... at least when it comes to a phone.
Apple products are nice in design, but are over rated in technology and innovation. It's popular video iPod is a perfect example as it's features and video quality are not as rich as Creative's Zen VisionM, but outsells them because of the iPod's image. In fact, a recent court case found that Apple stole the menu system from Creative. The iPhone will be the same. Jobs touts it was ground breaking, but almost everything has been done before. I'm sure hardcore Apple fans will eat it up, but I think as just like the PC market, cheaper and more open designs will keep the iPhone in a niche market.
regarding the LG, lets not forget that Apple subs out manufacturing to Korea for almost all the high-end stuff. LG likely did all the development for the iPhone unless their LG is THAT good at copying. as for the timing of the LG announcement, thats most likely do to some agreement, rather than coincidence...
Good critical thinking in your article re: the I-Phone. The market place will determine ultimate levels of success for this new variant. Apple will do well to heed the prognosticators, like you, before design or marketing inefficiencies, if any, occur. --Chris Cox, Boynton Beach, Florida
Disclosure: The iPhone is slated to use Yahoo! Mail and oneSearch, which are owned and operated by Yahoo! Inc., which also owns and operates Yahoo! Tech. ????? Now I have to switch to my msn account? I can't get far enough away from Steve "The Thief" Jobs.
LG had already exposed its touch phone in Europe almost at the same time the Iphone was annouced in the USA ( basically a year ago- same period). Saying that LG was just known only two months ago is misleading. But one should agree that the Iphone presents a better design over all teh other devices- But the real revolution and innovation will come from "Surface" of microsoft.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
46 Posted by wesscripps on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:43PM EDT Report Abuse
Cisco is a 32 billion dollar company. Why waste time with a little company such as Apple. Steve Jobs is nothing compared to the Giants of the telecom industry.