Spam level *declines*... to 97 percent of all email

Wed Apr 8, 2009 2:15PM EDT

See Comments (135)

If you think you're getting a lot of spam these days, well, that's because you are. In Microsoft's latest biannual report on the state of computer security, the company says that in the second half of 2008, a full 97.3 percent of email traffic was unwanted spam (or malicious email like phishing attacks and outright viruses). Surprisingly though, that's down a bit from the first half of last year, when total spam volume reached a whopping 98.4 percent of all email sent.

The latest report (which covers security through the end of 2008, so Conficker isn't part of the package) is available for download here. (Be warned: The full report is 184 pages long. Consider checking out the smaller highlight report instead.)

The good news: Spam filters are getting better than ever. Microsoft's filter system for Exchange now scrubs out 39 out of every 40 emails sent. Spam also saw that slight decline thanks to the shut down last year of the ISP McColo, a major haven for spammers who suddenly had to go shopping elsewhere.

What are we being spammed about? Pharmacy and other product ads make up the lion's share of spam, accounting for 72.2 percent of all spam sent. Only 10 percent of the total spam share now involves sexually-oriented pharmaceuticals; that's a huge decline from previous studies, as apparently Viagra and Cialis are no longer that hard to come by.

Image-only spam, dating come-ons, financial spam, and fraudulent diplomas round out the remainder of the most common spam subjects.

Alternate statistics show the total spam level at lower -- one source pegs it at a mere 81 percent of mail traffic (a figure which seems awfully low) -- and also notes that even with the taking down of McColo and other spammer ISPs, spam traffic will inevitably rise again to "normal" levels.

In the related world of malware infections, the Microsoft report noted that worldwide, 8.6 machines were suffering from malware for every 1,000 which were clean. That sounds pretty good, but it still translates to about 9 million computers worldwide suffering from malware attacks.

What do you need to watch out for today, attack-wise? The most common attacks at the moment target Microsoft Office and PDF files, and those types of attacks are further on the rise.

Comments on Spam level *declines*... to 97 percent of all email

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 26 Posted by yehaaah_2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    Spam Assasin on the server side plus Thunderbird trainable spam filter works amazingly well. How do you train? Simply sect a variety of emails and mark them as "spam" or "not spam". Over time it gets better and better at identifying spam. Pretty much no false positives.

  • 27 Posted by petehoffman@ymail.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    @mblaha2003: You lie like a rug. Spam doesn't target op systems, it targets emails. You fanboys never cease to amaze.

  • 28 Posted by halftrack1950 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    Trying to go after the spammers is not effective. The way to stop spam is to go after the business's the spam is promoting. Follow the money changing hands and take down the sites that are paying the spammers to promote. Without products to promote spam can't survive.

  • 29 Posted by merc2dogs on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    spammers don't care what computer you use, so having a mac has nothing to do with it. I must be one of the fortunate few, I don't recieve much spam at all, on one account I get maybe 12 a week, the other email addresses, I get maybe 1 a month. Don't do anything special or use any filters. Ken.

  • 30 Posted by rosaliedawn1981 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    now if they can get rid of the phony lottery scams. The ones that want your name, age, address, and not to mention all your personal numbers.

  • 31 Posted by iwpetc on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    #17 and #18.....yes. I do this. It works great. I wish I could do that with regular snail mail. I get about 3 real pieces of mail a week and quite a few Penny Savers, random coupons, credit card applications....

  • 32 Posted by time4mullets on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    I heard that if the spammers get one response out of a million, they make money.

  • 33 Posted by belproducer on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    Twice a year, I think we need to cancel all of our efforts to fight terrorists, spend nothing on defense, spend nothing on police, FBI, anything and focus 100% of money on tracking down and EXECUTING spammers. Do this twice a year. Public executions would be even better. If an entire company is spamming, I'll settle for the CEO, CFO, and the IT guy. Just twice a year is all I ask. ENFORCE AND PROSECUTE SPAMMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 34 Posted by philip_jones2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    By 'spam' are we talking here of what Microsoft calls 'spam' or the stuff we cant be bothered to read and designate it as such? In any event, any reduction is welcome.

  • 35 Posted by philip_jones2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    By 'spam' are we talking here of what Microsoft calls 'spam' or the stuff we cant be bothered to read and designate it as such? In any event, any reduction is welcome.

  • 36 Posted by peterbraun123 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    The problem with spam filters is that they filter out emails that I request from legitimate companies (like alerts, newsletters, and others). I am pretty happy with yahoo email, but I still have to glance through the junk folder because there are always some legitimate emails. We need a paid email, postage paid by sender. 1c per email would be enough for spammers while legitimate marketers (those whose products people buy) could get through and consumers would not have to pay much.

  • 37 Posted by dennykellogg on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    Spam! spam! SPAM! tHIS IS SPAM! spammmmm---God bless spam?

  • 38 Posted by belproducer on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    Actually, #34 has the best solution. Go after the businesses the spammers are promoting. Hint to politicians and judges: ROOT OUT AND CONVICT SPAMMERS and we WILL ELECT YOU. We hate them as much as or more than Bin Laden because they directly terrorize us all.

  • 39 Posted by michellemichaels92 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    it will decline more if people start sending the spammers addresses to others. i circulate them to the others warning them and telling them i sent them a virus and voila no more spammerso

  • 40 Posted by greg_z on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    i guess that i'm doing pretty good then. only 30 to 40 spams a day now, compared to 100's before.

  • 41 Posted by dwstxs1969 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    "See thats why I have a Mac. No spam for me." THIS is 'verbal' spam, and we are all getting tired of hearing it. MAC people should just S T F U and go away. So what if you don't get spam? Does your not getting it mean that you should be allowed to BE 'verbal' spam? No, it doesn't. so, get off it. You know what PC owners CAN do, that MAC owners can't? S T F U....that's what. There!

  • 42 Posted by damnyoudemons on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    People who are getting 1500-2000 spam messages a day are clearly handing out their e-mail address to anything that asks for it. The obvious course of action is to never give out your e-mail address except to those who you actually wish to communicate. If you absolutely have to sign up for something by e-mail, use an alternate account. I have done this for almost 3 years now on my yahoo mail account, and the most spam I ever get is PETA's very obnoxious "save the animals!" messages.

  • 43 Posted by torussell on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    I use a gmail account and barely get any spam, plus when i get it, it goes to the spam folder. Yahoo is the same, although there is a little more spam with yahoo. As far as macs being better, that is the biggest crock I have heard. I have owned a mac and I couldnt wait to get rid of it. Besides it takes an extra 5 minutes maybe to go through spam and filter it out. Im sorry but nobody is that busy to delete an email that they do not want.

  • 44 Posted by rugbyfree on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    mblaha2003...you are rediculous...it's not your OS that get's spammed it's your email address. Ways to get rid of spam... 1. Don't open emails that have attachments. 2. Set up a "junk" email that you use to sign up for things online. 3. Do not reply to spam emails. 4. Do not "unsubscribe" to email lists (believe it or not you are just verifying your address for them) 5. Block the IP address the email came from, not just the sender. 6. Only open emails from trusted individuals...be careful, chainmails from your friends are a major carriers of malware! 7. Stop spamming others with chain mail. We all know you do it...just quit...it's stupid and a waste of everyone's time. Esp. mine.

  • 45 Posted by joeinchicago1970 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    you mean no viruses you ----- tard. Macs get e mail spam just as much as pc's

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.