Craigslist prankster guilty, fined $75,000

Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:41AM EDT

See Comments (22)

Remember the case of "Craigslist prankster" Jason Fortuny? Probably not, so I'll refresh your memory. In 2006 Fortuny thought it would be a hoot to pretend to be a hot woman looking for a bondage session via Craigslist, and after posting an ad to that effect, he collected the 178 depraved responses he got and summarily posted them online, including photos, email addresses and phone numbers.

That got Fortuny a lot of publicity back in the day, and it also got him a lawsuit in 2008, as one of the victims (who remains anonymous in court filings) sued for a variety of claims, including "copyright infringement, public disclosure of private facts, and intrusion upon seclusion."

Now that case has been concluded, with the verdict rendered for the plaintiff and $74,252.60 in damages levied against Fortuny.

We may never know if Fortuny's defense -- that he had fair use to publish the photographs in question and that once he was emailed by the plaintiff he had taken his own private information public -- would have held up. Fortuny filed a letter with the court in July outlining his defense, but he had chosen to represent himself as counsel. He then failed to show up for the most recent hearing and the court entered a default judgment against him.

Fortuny has previously asserted that the court in question -- in Illinois -- didn't have jurisdiction in the matter since Fortuny lives in Washington state, and that seems to be his defense strategy at this point. Any attempt to collect the damages would give Fortuny a chance to have his case heard in Washington courts, where this whole process would likely have to begin again from scratch... at least as long as Fortuny doesn't set foot in Illinois, that is.

Comments on Craigslist prankster guilty, fined $75,000

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by pgonz62@ymail.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    This would be one for the courts, I would like to know what happens in this case. There are a lot of weird people out in this world. I bet he never thought anything would happen to him. He should know the old saying. He/She that defends themselves has a fool for a lawyer.

  • 2 Posted by rayvr@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    Perverts nothing! Fortuny trespassed against the privacy of others. Craigs list should be suing him as well as each of the individuals whose private information was compromised. This sounds a little bit like those religious fundamentalists who posted themselves outside adult shops and posted pictures and license numbers of those entering. This is an invasion of privacy and people who do this sort of thing should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Those responding to the Craigs list ad, as well as those entering the porn shops broke no laws. We do not make our own laws in this country. If that happened to me, I would not let these people rest until they were prosecuted or I would do the same thing to them to embarrass them, taking pictures of THEIR cars at the porn shops etc., and let them explain their way out of it.

  • 3 Posted by albertfkennedy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    while what he did may not be legal for one it sounds funny wish i had seen it i would have lmao i'm sure, so for that kudos! And in his defence creeps online that want to hook up so bad they send pictures they dont want seen? and important info? sounds like they already working over time to embarrass their selves

  • 4 Posted by alexgannis on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    "This sounds a little bit like those religious fundamentalists?" rayvr you make no sense in your comet religion as nothing to do with it, Unless you have a problem with religion then it you problem.

  • 5 Posted by heyopstack on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    to alexgannis, Everything you just said and failed to spell right ,made absolutely No sense. he or she was only trying to say that those religious fundamentalists pretty much did the same thing when it came to privacy issues and the invasion of it.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.