Sun May 31, 2009 8:29PM EDT
See Comments (17)
The rumors I wrote about last week involving the lifting of Windows 7 Starter Edition's three-application limit have turned out to be true: Microsoft confirms that it is lifting the three-app limit "based on the feedback we’ve received from partners and customers asking us to enable a richer small notebook PC experience."
However, Windows 7 Starter will retain a number of its restrictions -- a few I hadn't even known about -- which will make it unappealing to many users. Microsoft outlines them all in the blog post above, but the highlights include:
> No personalization options (changing background images/wallpapers or sounds)
> No Aero
> No DVD playback
> No Media Center features at all
> No domain support
> No XP virtualization mode
> No multi-monitor support
Those are hefty restrictions, but Microsoft has a solution for you if you want more.
The answer? Upgrade: Windows 7 Home Premium should run on many, if not most, netbooks out there, letting you put your cat's picture instead of the wavy blue default (or whatever image Microsoft ultimately makes the standard on Windows 7).
That of course begs the question what Windows 7 pricing will be like in its various flavors, and so far Microsoft has been playing that issue close to the vest. Windows 7 Starter users will surely qualify for an upgrade discount vs. buying a full retail copy, but how much?
If history is any guide, users should expect to pay an extra $70 to $170 for the right to jump up a step or two in the Win 7 hierarchy.
That said, some troubling signs are bubbling up that Windows 7 may be pricier than you and I would like it to be: One recent story suggests that Dell is already concerned that price is going to be an issue with consumers, and that Windows 7's average selling price is going to be higher than it was with either Windows Vista or XP. Ugh.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I do believe that Microsoft is trying to make more money, by selling you the upgrades to its Operating system so you can do what you want with it. I think that it is criminal. If there was a different Operating System out there, I would seriously look into it. I have had enough of the MS experience and if it means I have to go to a Mac, then so be it, I already have one in the house and it looks as if I will have more than one soon. Especially if Microsoft keeps getting like it is now, have a new product, oh but it has so many small problems but we will get out fixes as soon as we can. darn the consumer is what they are saying, I say darn them, buy Mac.
It worth the extra price concidering how much better Window 7 runs.
caleagle, try Linux in its various flavors.
Sure, Microsoft is hurting in this economy just like everybody and so desires to make more money. But their solution is simply create their own economy at the expense of the rest of us. Woe unto us PC users that were too blind to switch to Mac years ago. Microsoft sucks!
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by caleagle11@att.net on Sun May 31, 2009 10:23PM EDT Report Abuse
I think it's time for me to switch to Mac. I HATE VISTA! I have been putting up with the crap called Vista for two years now, and 7 is supposed to be better but more expensive?