Wed Jun 3, 2009 10:48PM EDT
See Comments (11)
I'll readily admit I sometimes get it wrong. I've written well over 2,000 of these posts, and once in awhile I goof it up.
And so I took a long, hard look at comments calling me out over my complaints about Windows 7 Starter Edition, some claiming that the OS was not due to be released in the USA.
Said one writer: "Chris, are you constantly posting about Starter Edition and netbooks to annoy me intentionally? At this time there is no proof (netbooks shipping with Starter Edition in the US) to say that Starter Edition will come on netbooks. And the policy for Starter Edition has always been for developing countries -- and that we have proof of." And another: "Starter Edition has not been intended for US release to my knowledge. I'm very sure it was intended for developing countries."
Strong words.
And I hate to break it to you, but you're dead wrong.
I can see the reason for all the confusion. Microsoft has written a lot about Starter Edition but has never said directly where it will be released. Many have made the assumption that it's a global product, though, and you'll find hundreds of blog posts and news stories online with that very impression.
So I double-checked with Microsoft, and the company confirmed that yes, Windows 7 Starter Edition is a global product that will be released everywhere, including here.
Why are people sure that Starter isn't a US product? Because there's another version of Windows 7 -- Windows 7 Home Basic -- that will be sold only in emerging markets. (That's the plan, anyway.) Both versions of Windows are stripped-down (though Starter is more so), and obviously this is creating some confusion in the market already, months before the OS is even released.
All of this pretty well illustrates the point I was making back in February when the Windows 7 lineup was first unveiled. Appearing in six different versions, I knew having all of these versions available was going to confuse consumers whether they were boxed at retail or even sold in their home country at all. Come to think of it, I got a lot of mail and comments with arguments to the contrary back then, too...
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Yet another "steaming terd" from Microsloth ? I say, more than likely ! Oh yea, just in time for the "Holiday Season". Honestly, give me a break. XP works VERY well for me and countless others, if you want to impress us, simply sell supplements to the XP program. You'll have to do better than "Media Center" addition though. Anything for a buck huh Microsoft....
"Yet another "steaming terd" from Microsloth ? I say, more than likely ! Oh yea, just in time for the "Holiday Season". Honestly, give me a break. XP works VERY well for me and countless others, if you want to impress us, simply sell supplements to the XP program. You'll have to do better than "Media Center" addition though. Anything for a buck huh Microsoft...." Not saying that Windows 7, or Vista for that matter is going to better or anything... But isn't that what people said about Windows 95, 98, 2000, etc...?
Nice Chris, Checking with Microsoft is the best thing to do. And it would be nicer if kupriaa 1 would admit he or she was wrong.
Chris checking with Microsoft was the best way to go about it, I don't see kupriaa1 post saying that he or she was wrong.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by lucasranderson on Wed Jun 3, 2009 10:51PM EDT Report Abuse
WOW, another post about Starter Edition huh?