Mon Jul 6, 2009 5:08PM EDT
See Comments (219)
The exodus toward flat-screen TVs continues, and that's been driving prices down across the board.
But if you're looking for the real deals, plasma is where it's at for now, according to a story in the Wall Street Journal.
What's going on? Put simply, plasma is a technology on its way out. Pioneer and Vizio have already announced this year that they're exiting the market, as manufacturers continue to pour their resources into LCD technology. LCD, used widely across the consumer electronics industry in not just televisions but also computer monitors, laptops, and even cameras and cell phones, has boundless momentum. Plasma, with its higher power requirements, larger size and weight, and finicky reliability, has remained TV-centric since its invention, despite some key benefits that have given the technology something of a cult following.
Meanwhile, there are still plenty of plasmas on the market, and not just close-out models. And diligent shoppers can find exceptional deals on plasma sets: Roughly 20 percent cheaper vs. LCD sets of the same size.
The WSJ story linked above note that a 50-inch LCD will run you $1,500 on average, while a 50-inch plasma runs about $1,200. Although prices vary widely from brand to brand and depend a lot on the features you select, in general the trend follows across the industry. Drop into any big-box electronics store and you're sure to see big discounts on all the plasma sets for sale.
Naturally there's a catch: As plasma vanishes from the market, you'll have an increasing amount of trouble finding someone who can service the set if it breaks. You'll also be stuck buying a very large set if you want a plasma: The technology starts at 42 inches diagonally, and you'll probably need a friend to help you move the thing, too.
Not everyone's giving up on plasma, though: Panasonic, which has long been the extreme market share leader in the plasma category, continues to invest in the technology and just constructed a new $3 billion plant to build the screens. What, didn't they get the memo?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
plasma costs too much in electricity even off, at free they r still expensive
Where did they get these info from. plasma has been the #1 selling TV in America for years. plasma will live forever
plasma tv i a big rip off i use to have a rca 52 inch plasma and the lamp burn every 2000 hours so any way the big news is that the lamp cost over 300 dollars and you have to replace it every year or less and if you find a company that sell it because they are change the technologi well you will find a chisnese lamp with pour quality and if nyou are lucky a good advice do not buy a plasma tv because at the end you will pay alot more money
Many keep talking about motion blur and true blacks, well with a LED TV with 240HZ, motion blur and true blacks are right there for you. I agree in quality of picture Plasma is way better then LCD. But LED is here now! I plan on picking up a 55in Samsung 8 series LED 240HZ TV in the next couple weeks for my basement/entertainment area..
I agree with the majority of posters. Plasma is the superior technology and picture. I have had my Panasonic Plasma for about four years, not one problem, and still delivers an incredible image. Didn't they get the memo? Sounds like Mr. Null is the one that didn't get the memo. LCD is not the future anyway. LED is the future.
To cesardelacueva_99: Plasma TVs don't use a "lamp." You are talking about about DLP projection. If you didn't even know what kind of TV you had, you probably shouldn't be commenting, in bad English nonetheless, about technology.
I got mine 5 years go and is still as bright as ever. No phosphor trails, no burn-in and no uneven aging ..
Love my Panasonic 50". Got it at Costco for $999.00.
i'm in the market for a new tv and plasma was never in the running. i work at a hotel that hat about 500 plasmas running all the time well about 8-10 hrs a day and they have to be changed out every 2 months becaust of screen burn. the only reason we havent switched to lcd is because of a contract.
I am very picky when it comes to picture quality When I got into the HDTV game I brought home 7 different LCD quality tvs. I drove my wife crazy. I finally got smart and brought home a 2009 model panasonic 50in plasma. And never looked back. LCDS just are to finicky and do not have great all around picture. Yes my plasma uses 200 more watts than a LCD. The picture is so worth the extra 3 bucks a month on my electric bill....Enjoy
Outdated technology right, 600hz compared to 240hz, ultra thin now and non-energy consuming (new models.) Plus they have much better color than ANY LCD could produce, and virtually no chance of burn in with weight comparable to any LCD, sounds like a win to me, you can keep the outdated LCD technology, with the pixelated screen on fast motion and horrible colors and horrible non HD picture. Keep buying the LCD's and I will keep buying plasma's for 1500 dollars for 60inch screens...
Man you all really need a life.. The current broadcast is very limited. 99% of all tv plasma lcd dlp even new led. all have less resolution then what braod casters can provide. Get an old fuzzy tv and more over GO OUTSIDE HAVE SOME FUN.
Anyone who says plasmas burn out too fast has not done the research. 60-80,000 HOURS equates to 10 years of watching TV. The picture on a plasma is better, the colors are richer, the contrast is superb.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
206 Posted by sourceview on Sun Oct 4, 2009 2:44AM EDT Report Abuse
I have had a samsung plasma for 5 years now - no problems. Of course, I only use it as a tv, and a monitor for my linux systems, and then I stream stuff off the Internet, not that much.