Mon Jul 6, 2009 5:08PM EDT
See Comments (219)
The exodus toward flat-screen TVs continues, and that's been driving prices down across the board.
But if you're looking for the real deals, plasma is where it's at for now, according to a story in the Wall Street Journal.
What's going on? Put simply, plasma is a technology on its way out. Pioneer and Vizio have already announced this year that they're exiting the market, as manufacturers continue to pour their resources into LCD technology. LCD, used widely across the consumer electronics industry in not just televisions but also computer monitors, laptops, and even cameras and cell phones, has boundless momentum. Plasma, with its higher power requirements, larger size and weight, and finicky reliability, has remained TV-centric since its invention, despite some key benefits that have given the technology something of a cult following.
Meanwhile, there are still plenty of plasmas on the market, and not just close-out models. And diligent shoppers can find exceptional deals on plasma sets: Roughly 20 percent cheaper vs. LCD sets of the same size.
The WSJ story linked above note that a 50-inch LCD will run you $1,500 on average, while a 50-inch plasma runs about $1,200. Although prices vary widely from brand to brand and depend a lot on the features you select, in general the trend follows across the industry. Drop into any big-box electronics store and you're sure to see big discounts on all the plasma sets for sale.
Naturally there's a catch: As plasma vanishes from the market, you'll have an increasing amount of trouble finding someone who can service the set if it breaks. You'll also be stuck buying a very large set if you want a plasma: The technology starts at 42 inches diagonally, and you'll probably need a friend to help you move the thing, too.
Not everyone's giving up on plasma, though: Panasonic, which has long been the extreme market share leader in the plasma category, continues to invest in the technology and just constructed a new $3 billion plant to build the screens. What, didn't they get the memo?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
yeah . . . i've got 5 plasmas going in my house . . . two are 5-6 years old and still look fabulous!! . . . plasmas are still the best for viewing sports (outside of certain rear projection tv's) . . .
Our Pioneer plasma is a beautiful thing. LCDs I have seen do not look as good.
what we need is quality programing,,i still use a folded dipole,ant. i would never pay to see reruns ,and the same program on mulitple slots,, i believe the untimate gol ofthe t networks is to end free broadcasting,,,i can still pick up 64 ovr he air stuff but many channells have several slots,and run the same program on all or,pull the switch on all but one,, i dd tv service work in the begining,,thats why I would never pay,,to watch,,i can view much tvstuff via vista computer
The plasma picture quality is superior to LCD for viewing movies and other high quality TV programming. The LCD picture is similar to watching movies on your computer, because it's the same technology.
KURO
I love my plasma, crisp and a large viewing angle. I hope the LED TV takes off then. I would hate to have LCD as my only option.
All of the Plasma TV's I have seen turn pink in bright scenes.I went with LCD for overall best picture. Coyotekid
Love my Panasonic plasma. To rogueist my plasma is rated for 10 years of never being turned off before the picture brightness is cut in half, lol.
plasma is the best picture, no motion blurr, better blacks and great viewing angles. all the LCD high end features are there to catch plasmas basics which was available at lower price already. i am so surprised WSJ was so unaware of plasma power consumption, where are thy getting their memos.
plasma is better in your standing right in front of it but from a distance lets say your couch, it all looks the same.
Crap. Another superior technology gets betamaxed out of existence. Oh and to the author of the article - maybe YOU should have gotten the memo. Cult following? Finicky reliability? Next time try doing some more fact-checking than spending five minutes with google.. oops, sorry... Yahoo's search engine.
i have had a toshiba 42" plasma for 4 years with no problems. nice.......
Plasma rules...just compare!!!
You know what I think? I think cheeseburgers are really good. But only the ones on onion rolls. And they should have REAL cheese. None of that fake stuff. Yeah. And mustard. Brown mustard. Yeah. That's what I think. Well, what do you think, vodojax! Because THAT has about as much to do with the conversation as the crap you posted!!!!
LAME! I got your memo RIGHT HERE!! Plasma has a much better quality of picture...but there is something even better on the Horizon...LED TV. I saw the new Samsung, and I'm saving my money to replace my Samsung 26" CRT HDTV. It's a lot more retailing at $1,599 for a 32", but the picture is fantastic which rich, deep blacks and crisp color and refresh rates. I'm sold, and I won't pay retail...Fry's Electronics already has them 10% off, so if they want to move product and compete, wait until Christmas. YEA!
Plasmas are not that great. If you have a good eye sight then get a LCD, cause plasmas have phosphor trails. Burn in and uneven plasma aging and having to brake it in for 200hrs not what a TV should be.
Plasmas are not that great. If you have a good eye sight then get a LCD, cause plasmas have phosphor trails. Burn in and uneven plasma aging and having to brake it in for 200hrs not what a TV should be.
Plasma has a MUCH bettter picture 40" and above. I love the marketing on how the plasmas " burn out". I know people who bought one almost 10 years ago ( when they were almost $ 10000.00) and it's still going strong
The other catch that no one talks about is that Plasma TVs use tremendously more energy than LCDs or Rear Projection DLPs...in some cases as much as 4 to five times that amount! So the user ends up paying more in electric bills in the long run. For a comparison of energy used among different types and brands of TVs go to www.MoreEnergySavings.com
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by stetsonmaddy on Mon Jul 6, 2009 8:45PM EDT Report Abuse
Plasma is the best TV for the money. If so, go for Panasonic. I have three and they have lasted for five years. The screen is clearer and the color is sharper. LCD's have duller and flatter pictures. Make sure you mount it.