Tue Jul 7, 2009 11:19AM EDT
See Comments (199)
By now we've had it beaten into our thick skulls: Protect your Social Security Number at all costs, because those nine magic digits are the gateway to your entire life. Financial history, medical records... just about everything hinges on your SSN remaining private.
As such, large-scale thefts of SSN and other private information continue to make headlines, but this piece of news takes the cake: Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University have now figured out a way to roughly reverse engineer the way in which Social Security Numbers are assigned. Armed with your date of birth and the state in which you were born, it's now possible to generate a quite small set of digits that are likely to contain your actual SSN.
How is this possible? Mainly because SSNs aren't just randomly generated. The first three digits are tied to your state of birth, and the next two digits (the "group number") are used sequentially as SSNs are handed out over time. The final four digits are supposedly random, but using a public database called the Death Master File, which lists SSNs that were held by the deceased, patterns emerged in those digits, as well.
The result is that, depending on the state and year of birth (the older you are and the larger your state of birth, the harder it is to guess your SSN), the researchers could guess a Social Security Number's first five digits with up to 90 percent accuracy, and the last four digits with up to 5 percent accuracy. Considering the odds of getting a SSN right by random guess really ought to be 1 in a billion, that's a phenomenal success rate.
And if those numbers seem small, consider that with the use of commonly-available botnets, computers could correctly guess dozens of SSNs every minute by simple brute force as they apply for bogus credit cards en masse. The Ars Technica story linked above also notes that many credit card verification services allow for a couple of digits in an SSN to be wrong, as a convenience for forgetful applicants, opening the door a little wider for hackers.
What happens now? It's hard to imagine an organization as venerable and bureaucratic as the Social Security Administration to change the way it works, but it's hard not to think that the nine-digit SSN may have at last outlived its utility, and its security. Still, just try to imagine the upheaval should the country attempt to move to longer numbers...
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
First thing I must say thank you for printing this... You have now inspired criminals around the globe how get S. S. numbers.... A job well done!!!
We should have give in a pin number on our SSI card too, and only we should know that number. thats how it is both fair and safe too.
I have only nine digits. How do you get ten digits?
why dont we just give in and get our chips embedded. the antichrist will come *or not* independent of chips, I promise.
The thing that is even more frightening about this is the fact that in many cases the last 4 of your social is used for verification and is printed on documents. If the first 5 can be generated with 90% accuracy then we need to resort to constant credit monitoring to protect ourselves from fraud.
Well I guess I am one of the lucky ones ... No one would want to be who I am !! ... But seriously if this is true there should be a a way of re-assigning all numbers randamly ... Almost like changing your password ... Maybe have a form to do this enclosed with this years tax return? Any ideas?
I had a car repoed from Triad Financial. On the repo order it had my full name, birth date and social security number. So I guess that banks care about your private info.
There may be some validity to this, but the first three digits are not the state of birth. My son and I have the same first three digits as we got out numbers in the same state, but we were not born in the same state.
I THINK THEY SHOULD GIVE YOU A PIN NUMBER, NO TO BE GIVEN TO ANYONE
Tracking everything we do by our Social Security Number (which is required in the USA and is issued at birth now) is just another "Big Brotherism" of our government. Our "FREEDOM" comes with a pretty high price! Re: post #191 ...shades of Orwells' 1984??? just a few decades late???
Ah, what happened to the phrase that was on my Social Security card when first issued? All of them used to say "not to be used for identification" down at the bottom.
So why do they insist on tying our life, job, and medical records to the darn thing?
And if it were the previous administration, it would already exist, be 2000 people in three countries, and there'd be a list of SSNs that flag another large, secret agency every time they get used. The idea of a user-held key in addition to an SSA held key should allow a software solution without as much change. The other 'easier' solution if we need more numbers is to go alphanumeric. Please, include some sort of checksum as well to help the typists.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
186 Posted by gemberlingb on Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:36PM EDT Report Abuse
Every commercial advertisement is "spam". Did you opt in to any of the commerical ads on television, radio, newspapers, magazines, billboards? NO. Why should email marketers get such grief when people on their lists actually HAVE opted in?