Downloading music: The environmental angle

Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:06PM EDT

See Comments (8)

You're not just saving yourself a lot of hassle by downloading songs directly to your computer instead of buying them as CDs and ripping them later. You're doing the environment a favor, too.

That's the conclusion of a study (funded by Microsoft and Intel but performed by researchers at Carnegie-Mellon and Stanford University) which has attempted to accurately measure how much carbon dioxide production is associated with various methods of buying music. (Actual study [PDF format] is here.)

In the study, the researchers looked at six different usage scenarios: A standard drive-to-the-store retail CD purchase, an online retail purchase shipped by road, an online retail purchase shipped by air, a digital download, a digital download burned onto a bare CD, and a digital download burned onto CD and stored in a plastic case.

As you might guess, the digital download was -- by far -- the method of purchase with the smallest CO2 impact. Specifically, less than 500 grams of CO2 on average are generated by downloading an album online. Even adding in a CD burn and case keeps the numbers relatively low: About 1200 grams of CO2 are produced if you back up your music to CD and pop it in a jewel case, with the bulk of that production associated with the production of the case.

The worst way to get music? Driving to your local retailer and taking it home. Due to the general inefficiency of non-commercial vehicles, you're wasting well over half of your 3000-plus grams of CO2 produced just driving to and from the store. By comparison, e-tail delivery generally produces 2000 to 2500 grams of CO2 per album, depending on whether the primary shipment method is via truck or plane, respectively.

Naturally, the numbers are only an average and are subject to substantial debate. If you live next door to the mall and walk there to buy a CD, you're generating far less CO2 than someone who has to drive 10 miles to and from Wal-Mart. There's also the question of whether it is more efficient for a music studio to mass produce thousands of albums than it is for you to burn a CD at home.

Still, it's an interesting study and one that puts a number on something we probably know in our gut but never think about explicitly. Now, knowing that buying a CD at a store produces six times the carbon of downloading the same album online, does that weigh into your decision on how to make the purchase?

Comments on Downloading music: The environmental angle

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by rogueist on Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    Who burns CDs anymore? Digital download to hard drive - period. End of life story. If it gets moved, it gets moved to another hard drive, or temporarily to my iPod.

  • 2 Posted by monko12105 on Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    Limewire isn't bad. Its eco-friendly. (I hate hippys)

  • 3 Posted by macksumum1 on Wed Aug 19, 2009 6:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    what about people who drive cross country on vacations every year? i guess people need to think twice before deciding to destroy the planet and forget about going to the movies.

  • 4 Posted by o2cmefly on Wed Aug 19, 2009 9:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    I've said it a thousand times already, but I'll say it again. CO2 IS NOT DESTROYING THE PLANET! It's not really even a "greenhouse gas". It STILL is only about 0.4% of our atmosphere. That's only 400 PPM (parts per million). Plants breathe it in, and need CO2 for photosynthesis, then they breath out oxygen. The theory of anthropomorphic (human-caused) climate change is false. We (humanity) are NOT destroying the earth. Like any living thing, the earth has natural cycles. It gets warmer, it gets cooler. There's nothing we did to change that, there's nothing we can do to change it, EVER.

  • 5 Posted by ritchie79@ymail.com on Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think you are a bit wrong there o2cmefly, We are destroying the earth, i dont see animals destroying habitat to build structures. And no im no Hippie, I believe we are a virus, JaJaJa like the movie Matrix said. If we dont change, then we are all doomed to destroy earth. I might not practice Green to the extreme or at all so dont call me a hypocrite, im just stating that you might be wrong.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.