Fri Feb 2, 2007 3:51AM EST
See Comments (12)
Many of us pretend to be able to understand and analyze the terms that Microsoft (and let's be fair, every other software company) inserts into its EULAs, or end user license agreements. But some of that language is so thick that laypeople can barely make heads or tails of it. What does the Vista EULA really say? Well, real lawyers put it into human terms for you in this BBC article.
Want to know what you might need to worry about? A lot, starting with what the BBC terms "unprecedented loss of consumer control overĀ [your] own PCs."
How about some details?
Here are some of the provisions in Vista:
The big one can be found at the bottom of the story: Windows Vista intentionally degrades picture quality of high-definition DVDs when played on virtually all monitors. The story points out that you actually pay more for Vista because of this, as Vista eats up computing resources by checking 30 times every secondĀ that the "premium content" is not being "attacked." That requires higher-end hardware and costs money for programming services.
Microsoft says this is required by movie studios if you want those movies to play at all. Huh. Well, I guess it's all there in the fine print.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
One more reason not to buy this garbage
Heck, unlike before 95-2k windows. I was about to buy Vista but it turned out Alavista Baby. I recommend we should wait and wait!
"For greater certainty, the terms and conditions remove any doubt about who is in control by providing that "this agreement only gives you some rights to use the software. Microsoft reserves all other rights"." So far I haven't seen any "must have" features in Vista. BitLocker would be nice to protect my personal data, but the price is too high when freeware such as TrueCrypt are around. I think I'll just continue with XP and eventually move to Linux on future builds.
Gotta love Microsoft, only they would have the balls big enough to even attempt to pull this off. I can't think of a less consumer friendly bunch than the unholy trio of the RIAA, MPAA and Microsoft. To be fair, Apple's iPod and iTunes is not much better with their proprietary format and restrictive rules. But I don't recall them ever sabotaging their media players to enforce DRM. How many more reasons will consumers and businesses need to switch to a better alternative like Linux or Mac (for the less adventurous)?
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by jayaveladvocate on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:29PM EDT Report Abuse
I suspect that that windows update target google gadget and yahoo messenger for corrupting them. I think my suspicion gets thicker and thicker s jayavel