Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:36PM EDT
See Comments (90)
Got a digital voice recorder like one of these? Watch out how you use it or you could land yourself in scorching legal trouble. One man recently found that out the hard way, after he was arrested and discovered to be recording the goings-on with just such a device in his pocket. Not only is he now facing charges for disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, and trespassing, he's also charged with unlawful wiretapping and possessing a device for wiretapping.
The story goes that one Chi Quang Truong was embroiled in a dispute with a Massachusetts auto service center, which didn't repair his car as quickly as Truong wanted. Truong got into a verbal scuffle with the service shop and the police were called. Apparently Truong was recording all of this -- for reasons unknown -- using a device stowed in his pocket, and cops added the wiretapping charges to his rap sheet during his arrest.
But wait a second: Don't you need a wire to get charged with wiretapping? I thought so too, and the theory here is that since Truong didn't have explicit permission to record the conversation (memories of Linda Tripp), he was slapped with the additional charges. In 12 states (California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington) you're required to get the permission of all parties on the line before making any kind of recording. In the rest of the country, any single member that's part of the conversation can legally record it without consent from the other parties. And as Network World notes, wiretapping laws largely extend to in-person communications now, so no wire is required.
Still, does the punishment really fit the crime? Wiretapping is a class D felony, and that can mean (based on my admittedly limited understanding of criminal statutes) up to 12 years in prison. While Truong is unlikely to face anything that severe (and, in all probability, will have the wiretapping charges dropped as his prosecution progresses), he probably shouldn't be facing charges for any of this. And "possession of a wiretapping device"? Yikes. Even my iPhone has a voice recorder feature built in. I'm in possession of such a device any time I step out in public.
Check your own pockets, briefcase, purse, or backpack: You might be a criminal!
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Cops use a video camera and microphone to record everything when they pull people over. They do it to "protect" themselves in court. I see NOTHING wrong with recording a run-in with a cop or repair shop to show my evidence in case the other side happens to LIE about their conduct, like the cops often do. What does someone have to do when they get pulled over by a cop? Inform them that they are recording the conversation first? BULL! Then the Cop would promptly "confiscate" your recorder.
does our goverment have a promition of all the citizens to record our conversations? if that guy i brought up on charges so should be the whole us gov.
Illinois is not a two party state. Though there are exceptions to the Illinois statute, it only applies to law enforcement and third parties per the Supreme Court of Illinois.
phdave ur jokes are horrible and stereotypical because his name is asian. Gones are chinese btw
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by parkerjo23 on Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:19PM EDT Report Abuse
Often times wiretapping rules only apply if there is a "reasonable expectation of privacy." So if they were in a persons office, I could see how it applies. If they were in the lobby/front area I don't think it would stick.